This post has been edited by CatholicforChrist: 22 October 2004 - 03:20 AM
Vocation Question and Comments Traditional Latin Mass
#1
Posted 22 October 2004 - 03:19 AM
#2
Posted 22 October 2004 - 10:00 AM
#3
Posted 22 October 2004 - 11:34 AM
10/22
I want to be a priest, not because of the Liturgy that I would say, but because it pleases God that I be a priest. I've been to the Tridentine Mass (please refrain from calling it traditional, as it is far from so) and the Lord is not calling me to join an order just so that I can celebrate it precisely because I'm not called to an order. It's great and beautiful, but so is the Ruthenian Liturgy - and I'm not going to cross the Bosporous just so I can say it.
Besides, if you are looking into joining an order for their Liturgy, at least give the Ambrosians and the Mozarabs a chance as well as the FSSP.
#4
Posted 22 October 2004 - 02:23 PM
Pio Nono, on Oct 22 2004, 12:34 PM, said:
You have made this claim before and it has been refuted. Need I do it again? Of course you would need to back it up with something.
Quote
The terms "Ambrosian and Mozarab" indicate a Rite of the Catholic Church, not religious orders. Aside from that, they are allowed on a regular basis only in Milan and Toledo, Spain, respectively.
#5
Posted 24 October 2004 - 11:15 PM
God be with you as you continue you discernment. Take your time, don't make a quick decision, and always follow God's will not your own.
Pax Christi,
Tony
#7
Posted 25 October 2004 - 06:31 AM
PaxVobis, on Oct 25 2004, 12:15 AM, said:
That's no joke. Hopefully this will be alleviated to some extent by the construction being done at most of these places to make more room.
#9
Posted 27 October 2004 - 02:11 PM
10/27 - Thirtieth Wednesday
Quote
Please excuse me if it seems that, as of late, I have been giving you all the shaft. Studying in Rome has its ups (which should be obvious) and its downs - included in those is that I'm unable to access a computer as regularly as I would like.
Quote
pspx, If you could, please offer me your evidence again - I seem to have forgotten it. I'd like to prevent myself from making the same error in the future.
Quote
I suppose this was unclarity on my part - I was referring to the Liturgies themselves. It sounded as if CatholicforChrist was wanting to join up somewhere because of the Liturgy and I was encouraging him to take a look at as many of the Western Rites as he could.
BTW, as I understand, the Society of St. John Cantius is a good order as well. They celebrate both the Tridentine and Novus Ordo Liturgies, and I think they're trying to get faculties to offer Ruthenian Liturgies (which would be interesting in a Polish parish).
#10
Posted 28 October 2004 - 09:27 AM
Pio Nono, on Oct 27 2004, 03:11 PM, said:
I apologize for the comment about you never replying. It was out of line, and quite an unfair assesment. I was overly grouchy (more so than usual) when I posted.
Quote
The evidence I gave was in reference to the so called "Tridentine" Rite; namely, that it was not created at Trent and was merely the codification of the Roman Rite, which is commonly held to be, in its essence, one of the most ancient Rites of the Church. This was in response to your claim that the Roman Rite cannot be referred to as "traditional". I'm restating this only so we can be clear as to what we are talking about and so you are aware of what I was referring to. As far as an evidence is concerned, I shall try to find the old post.
Quote
I see. Even so, it would do no good to take a look at them when discerning a vocation (at least not as possible "vocations") since they may only be said in Cathedrals of Toledo and Milan.
Quote
They are certainly a good order and I think they will play a key role in restoring the liturgy. That would be very very interesting if they were granted permission to offer the Ruthenian Divine Liturgy. They are quite beautiful.
#11
Posted 28 October 2004 - 10:44 AM
10/28 - Sts. Simon and Jude
Quote
Not a problem - I didn't take it personally because I knew you'd understand. ;)
Quote
As this isn't a debate table, I won't start up a debate with you - however, your point is well taken. I'll try to keep from incorrectly referring to it in the future. Thanks. :)
#12
Posted 23 November 2004 - 11:53 PM

Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote




