Eastern Catholics Called "roman" Catholic
#1
Posted 01 November 2003 - 06:33 PM
I know some Orthodox people who insist on calling Eastern Catholics in communion with Rome "Roman" Catholic. I've read on the EWTN Eastern Catholic forums that Eastern Catholics do not like this term because 1.) Roman Catholic was a term made up by anti-Catholic Anglicans, 2.) in common usage, it refers to the Roman or Latin Rite or Church, and they've had to work hard to get their traditions known throughout the Western World, and 3.) it is not the official title of the Catholic Church to begin with - - Roman or Eastern.
I've pointed out that "Roman" Catholic is offensive to many Eastern Catholics, and that it's not even an accurate term. Is there anything else I should say, though?
I'm starting to get a bit annoyed at their ignorance in dissing the Eastern Catholics.
Thanks, and God bless,
Jennifer Benjamin
#5
Posted 01 November 2003 - 08:22 PM
I may have misunderstood your post cmotherofpirl!
#6
Posted 01 November 2003 - 08:36 PM
Anglo-catholic usually refers ( at least in England) to Anglicans who are "high church" who have a service somewhat like our Mass, "Low church usually refers to Anglcains who are more like evangelicals.
Some Anglicans have converted to Catholicism as a whole parish, ministers included. The minister becomes a priest (he is re-ordained by the Bishops), and their Mass has some Anglican elements retained.
THey are called Catholics of the Anglican Rite, just as I am a Catholic or the Roman (or Latin) Rite.
Here is a website:
http://www.users.voi...s/whoarewe.html
#8
Posted 01 November 2003 - 08:57 PM
#11
Posted 01 November 2003 - 09:33 PM
Greek Orthodox are not Catholic, though very close. The Catholic church recognizes the G.O.'s sacrament of Communion as valid and therefore you could receive It, if there was no way to receive It at a Catholic church. I'm not sure how the Greek Orthodox would feel about it though. The Eastern Rite Catholic church is Catholic, intimately no different then the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church.
#12
Posted 01 November 2003 - 10:45 PM
i wont call them that if that offends them, but technically they are Roman Catholic. i don't think it should be an offensive term. it's kinda like yankee doodle. the southerners did that to make fun of us if im not mistaken, but the song became our big patriotic song. just the same, i don't think we should be ashamed that our Church is centered in the place where Cephas, the rock, St. Peter... was crucified upside-down in an act of humility and where St. Paul was beheaded, and the area of which the bishop there has always been claimed to be the successor to the Apostle, The Rock (Peter)
#13
Posted 02 November 2003 - 12:21 AM
#14
Posted 02 November 2003 - 01:36 AM
Quote
Someone I knew in college did that, and he said that you had to show there was some spiritual benefit to it. In his case, he was half Ukranian and half Slovak, so because he was half Ukranian he was able to switch. He later was ordained a Ukranian Rite Catholic priest; he is not married, and I have heard that they don't approve a rite-switch just so you can become a married priest.
#15
Posted 02 November 2003 - 07:59 AM
IXpenguin21, on Nov 1 2003, 07:57 PM, said:
By definition, no, it is impossible to "convert" from the Roman Catholicism to Eatern Catholicism. To convert from one thing to another means to leave the original thing behind, but really, they are both the same thing.
Okay, so that's just being pedantic, but remember that the One, Holy, Catholic (read: universal) and Apostolic Church has many members, many faces, many facets. The Roman Catholic Church is one, and, for example, the Chaldean Church is another, yet they are both part of the same Universal (read: Catholic) Church.
#16
Posted 02 November 2003 - 09:46 AM
The term 'Roman Catholic' thus comes from an anti-Catholic bias. In one sense I am pleased to be called a 'Roman Catholic' because it emphasises that I (through my bishop) am in communion with the Universal Pastor, the successor of Peter, the servant of the servants of God, i.e. the Pope.
But in another sense, the term 'Roman Catholic' annoys me. My mum is a Syrian Catholic, completely in communion with Rome, but her church has a different rite and canon law and customs and history. This may surprise some of you but there are something like 22 or 23 Catholic churches, all of them FULLY in communion with our Holy Father the Pope. The vast majority of them are Eastern rite Catholics, but even in the Latin West you do get Catholics of the Mozarabic rite (in Toledo, Spain) and Ambrosian rite (in Milan, Italy). Their Mass in some ways looks really familiar, and in other ways completely different (but nice different). The majority of us Latin Catholics happen to belong to the Roman rite.
Any of us can receive communion in any of these Catholic churches of a different rite. They aren't something alien----they're family!!!!
By the way, the Catechism consistently talks about the 'Catholic Church', and we don't officially seem to call ourselves 'Roman Catholic Church', unless we mean that part of the Catholic Church of the Roman rite. (But I could be wrong...)
#18
Posted 02 November 2003 - 02:47 PM
http://credo.stormlo...om/ritesofc.htm
#20
Posted 02 November 2003 - 08:35 PM
Quote
Are all the rites slightly different forms of mass, or is it deeper than that? Presumably their understanding of communion is the same?
Quote
I'm sorry, I didn't know. Now that I do, I won't use the terms in the future. I hope I haven't inadvertently offended anyone at Phatmass! :unsure:

Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote






