QUOTE(Carmelitess @ Jun 18 2007, 12:03 PM) [snapback]1297697[/snapback]
Hi, all!
I've been wondering about something for a while. Why do some religious communities (cloistered and active) engage in the media? Some religious houses watch the nightly news or surf the internet, still others even watch the latest movies! Now, if there is a religious on this forum whose community does allow them to do the things I mentioned, please don't take offense at what I'm writing because I just don't understand and need clarification.
I'm particularly disturbed by cloistered nuns who go online, watch movies, and view television. I found a link on Phatmass to an NBC segment on the PCPAs in Arizona, and it said that they watch the latest movies and sports (which are inundated with suggestive commercials). I also know of another Poor Clare monastic community in Washington that watches Oprah occasionally and even looks at YouTube!! How can these sisters keep their minds clean and pure when they're sullying them with the media?
Would anyone be able to explain the reasons behind all of this? Thanks!
God bless,
Margaret
Hi Margaret,
I understand your concerns, and in my community our use of the media is directly linked with our Youth Apostolate. Don Bosco, our founder, was always on top of using the latest mediums of communication to spread the Gospel. As a result of this we are trying to build a strong web presence. We do go to movies with our kids (after carefully selecting something appropriate, but it is not often), we watch the news to stay on top of what is happening in the world (it has a huge impact on what is going on in the lives of the young people around us), we read newspapers when we have the time (there is no such thing as a good, agenda free, daily newspaper, dear... you kind of have to "pray-as-you-go" through it), and we have posted videos to youtube. Sometimes our kids want to show us something. It can make for a great teachable moment. We have to be discerning about what we consume from the media, but to cut ourselves off from it completely would be to deny a large part of our vocation as Salesian Sisters --- to meet young people and youth culture where they are at and bring the message of Christ to it.
QUOTE
Btw, here is a quote from Santa Teresa d'Avila:
"Let them beware, for the devil through very small things, drills holes through which very large things enter. May it not happen that those who are to come say: 'These things are not important; don't go to extremes.'" Foundations, ch. 29, 32
I realize that Santa Teresa was speaking to her Carmelites, but I think this applies to all orders, active and contemplative. Father Benedict Groeschel, CFR (who, of course, is not cloistered) doesn't go to movies (unless it's a religious film such as The Passion of the Christor The Nativity Story), watch the news, listen to the news on the radio, or use the Internet. He stays very well-informed due to his reading of periodicals such as The New York Times. I definitely think that contemplatives should be more careful than the active communities, and shoudn't even be reading the newspaper, which also has inappropriate material in it. A good priest, friar, or layman can inform them of what world news they should add to their prayers.
The New York times is not without biases... but I think that the point is that each religious community has a different spirituality and charism and discerns the movement of the Spirit for them. We should not be so quick to hold one community up as being the standard that all other communities should follow. We have to understand that for some communities the watching of the news or going to the movies can be a significant part of their vocation (Daughters of Saint Paul are an excellent example and they have a media apostolate). The CFRs have a very ascetical kind of life. The Carmelites are communal hermits. It is not fair to compare apples to carrots and then say that apples are better because they are more red. Please be careful when making judgments such as that because you will run into a lot of logical flaws that way.
QUOTE
The Internet is a very good way of attracting new vocations, and I think that every religious community should consider having a website. It should be updated (new photographs, etc.) and maintained by the laity without the nuns, sisters, friars, monks, or brothers ever going online. I'm sure that, in an entire diocese, there would be someone willing to grant this service to the local religious house. I really don't think it's good to go online if you're a religious or priest because there are too many temptations therein. Even if one goes to a benign website, there might be an enticing link that would cause a near occasion of sin.
If there are too many temptations for religious who live in a community and have a strong prayer life then I think it would be MORE dangerous for lay people to go on the internet. If a religious does not possess the discerning maturity to be able to go on the internet and maintain their own webpage and take care of the email, then I would really wonder what they are doing in Religious Life. What are they running from? What issue/sin have they not dealt with in their life and why are they not open with their community about it? Some communities may choose to designate one person to do this, some may feel that allowing all of their members to email is perfectly fine. Each community is different, but I do not think that just because there are bad things on the internet that one should completely throw it out. It can be a powerful medium for bringing Christ to others. What about shopping malls? Are we never to use them? There are some bad stores in malls. If you continue this line of logic you will eventually never leave your house for fear of coming across evil... hopefully eventually realizing that the seed of sin lies within our own hearts and that if we allow God to heal us and sanctify us He will protect our actions and guide us... and if we should come across something evil, He will give us the grade to turn from it.
QUOTE
Here is an example of an innocent-sounding webname being bad. I was looking for the old 1950s Disney Cinderella, and went to [mod]link edited[/mod]. Imagine my surprise and disgust to find that it was a porn site! Our celibate priests and religious have enough trouble staying chaste without having that type of exposure. Just because the Internet, movies, television, and radio are available doesn't mean that we should utilize them, especially if they have the potential to damage our souls. I realize that the Internet is very convenient for cloistered religious, but there are other ways of obtaining information and products than from the Internet. Part of religious life is sacrifice and austerity---poverty.
I hope this didn't offend anyone. Thanks to all who posted for giving their side of things!
My dear, I think that although you grasp well the evils on the internet you really should look at what is good out there. Ever seen the
adoration webpage? It is a beautiful webpage. PhatMass is another example of something good out there. If the internet is a source of sin for someone, of course they should limit it in their lives --- the same for movies and newspapers, and so on... but in general most people will be able to remain faithful to the Lord if they have a strong prayer life and are discerning about where they go and what they do. You probably do more damage to yourself by getting very upset when you come across a bad site (by accident), rather than simply changing the page and peacefully offering God a prayer for those people who made it.
Yes, the internet is convenient for cloistered religious, so they should use it if their community feels the need. Have you ever looked through some of the catalogs that convents end up on the mailings lists for? Some of those can have some pretty evil things concealed within! There is the taint of sin everywhere, but "where sin abounds grace abounds all the more" Romans 5:20.
So be at peace.

God bless,
Sr Colleen