Communion In The Hand, And The Candidate's Girlfriend?
#1
Posted 01 March 2010 - 07:10 PM
I think the vidoe pretty much speaks for itself. Thank you Fr.Z...shall we think of up various punishments for the presidential candidate's girlfriend?
http://wdtprs.com/bl...on-in-the-hand/
#2
Posted 01 March 2010 - 07:14 PM
#3
Posted 01 March 2010 - 07:16 PM
#4
Posted 01 March 2010 - 07:25 PM
When will the horror of Communion in the hand stop?
Far be it from us to say something like this about what the Church allows. When will the horror of frowning upon the pope stop?
Now for the video: I would venture to say that that was intentional disrespect, not just ignorance. She looked very triumphant and was very conspicuous about the way she did that.
Edit: In my humble opinion, it's so, soooo misguided to think that this problem comes from the allowance of communion in the hand. Why on earth would you think that she would not have done that had she received on the tongue?
Edited by Totus Tuus, 01 March 2010 - 07:27 PM.
#5
Posted 01 March 2010 - 08:35 PM
Edit: In my humble opinion, it's so, soooo misguided to think that this problem comes from the allowance of communion in the hand. Why on earth would you think that she would not have done that had she received on the tongue?
If receiving on the tongue were the normative form of reception, the fact that the host ended up in her hand would have been more scandalous and noticed by those present I would think. While I agree with you that reception on the tongue does not in any way prevent someone from mistreating the host immediately afterward, I would imagine that communities where reception on the tongue is the norm are also areas where individuals are better catechized on the True Presence and thus there exists an overall greater reverence for the Eucharist.
#6
Posted 01 March 2010 - 08:44 PM
Simply disgusting.
#7
Posted 01 March 2010 - 08:56 PM
Far be it from us to say something like this about what the Church allows. When will the horror of frowning upon the pope stop?
Catholics don't have to accept blindly that every disciplinary decision, especially one that is merely permissive (like the indult for Communion in the hand) is prudent or beneficial to the faithful.
Edited by Resurrexi, 01 March 2010 - 09:17 PM.
#8
Posted 01 March 2010 - 09:15 PM
She put JESUS IN HER BOYFRIEND'S POCKET and then patted the pocket containing... JESUS.
Sorry. I'm a tad flabbergasted.
#9
Posted 01 March 2010 - 09:21 PM
Catholics don't have to accept blindly that every disciplinary decision, especially one that is merely permissive (like the indult for Communion in the hand) is prudent or beneficial to the faithful.
There's a difference between accepting blindly and equating allowances of Holy Mother Church -even if they are indults- with "horror."
That's my .02.
Edited by Totus Tuus, 01 March 2010 - 09:22 PM.
#10
Posted 01 March 2010 - 09:23 PM
There's a different between accepting blindly and equating allowances of Holy Mother Church -even if they are indults- with "horror."
That's my .02.
I quite agree with good Father Z.'s description of Communion in the hand.
#11
Posted 01 March 2010 - 09:29 PM
I quite agree with good Father Z.'s description of Communion in the hand.
JMJ
Everyone who like's Fr.Z, please raise your hand. ME!!! Now, who would like to think up various forms of public penance for this terribly dillusional woman?
#12
Posted 01 March 2010 - 09:31 PM
#13
Posted 01 March 2010 - 09:33 PM
I wonder what I'd look like receiving communion on video?
JMJ
I try to be careful with my tongue, becaue I don't want the priest vomiting on me. I barely stick my tongue out at all, actually. It's easier that way when an elderly priest gives Communion, and has shaky hands.
#14
Posted 01 March 2010 - 09:46 PM
#15
Posted 01 March 2010 - 09:51 PM
I quite agree with good Father Z.'s description of Communion in the hand.
And he quite agrees with calling communion in the hand a horror. So this is where we agree to disagree. Pax!
#16
Posted 01 March 2010 - 09:55 PM
And we will go no further, I don't want a major arguement. We are here to talk about the candidate's girlfriend :-) Or we casn talk about how stupid boy's choirs are.
#17
Posted 01 March 2010 - 10:55 PM
So you're saying that worldwide condemnation from faithful Catholics isn't enough of a public penance?JMJ
Everyone who like's Fr.Z, please raise your hand. ME!!! Now, who would like to think up various forms of public penance for this terribly dillusional woman?
I was wondering the same thing.I wonder what I'd look like receiving communion on video?
About myself, not you, but still.
Wait. You don't want the priest vomiting on you? Has this happened to you before?JMJ
I try to be careful with my tongue, becaue I don't want the priest vomiting on me. I barely stick my tongue out at all, actually. It's easier that way when an elderly priest gives Communion, and has shaky hands.
#18
Posted 01 March 2010 - 11:08 PM
I remember a time when I had a fight with one of my high school friends because she received in the hand and put the eucharist in her pocket. She ate the host later. From what I was told by her, she didn't partake because of some medical reason. So she saved it for later. I almost lost her friendship for talking about how offended I was.
#19
Posted 01 March 2010 - 11:19 PM
It is a logical fallacy to blame an individual's action on a Catican Council that took place before she was born (from the look of her). Individuals did irreverent things before the Vatican Council, and they continue to do them after it. The particular name of this particular logical fallacy is "antes hoc, ergo propter hoc." I'll leave it to the Latin scholars to explain.
#20
Posted 01 March 2010 - 11:34 PM
That is pretty strange.JMJ
I think the vidoe pretty much speaks for itself. Thank you Fr.Z...shall we think of up various punishments for the presidential candidate's girlfriend?
http://wdtprs.com/bl...on-in-the-hand/









