Jump to content

  •  

Photo
* * * * - 1 votes

Crazy Clergy, Words Fail Me


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#1 cappie

cappie

  • Catholic Clergy
  • 8,467 posts

Posted 05 August 2012 - 06:38 PM

FATHER Greg Reynolds wants his church of dissident Catholics to welcome all - ''every man and his dog'', one might say, risking the non-inclusive language he deplores - but even he was taken aback when that was put to the test during Mass yesterday.

A first-time visitor arrived late at the Inclusive Catholics service in South Yarra with a large and well-trained German shepherd. When the consecrated bread and wine were passed around, the visitor took some bread and fed it to his dog. :pinch:

Apart from one stifled gasp, those present showed admirable presence of mind - but the dog was not offered the cup!

Father Reynolds, a Melbourne priest for 32 years, launched Inclusive Catholics earlier this year. He now ministers to up to 40 people at fortnightly services alternating between two inner-suburban Protestant churches. :crazy:

Read more: http://www.theage.co...l#ixzz22ipCOaT9

#2 Spem in alium

Spem in alium

    PM Super Alien

  • St. Hasa Perm
  • 1,107 posts
  • Catholic

Posted 05 August 2012 - 06:45 PM

:eek: :covereyes: :pinch:

#3 homeschoolmom

homeschoolmom

    Hey, sheep....

  • Church Militant
  • 37,295 posts
  • Catholic

Posted 05 August 2012 - 06:45 PM

:blink: I'm speechless.



(I wish Americans used "fortnight" more often...)

#4 CatherineM

CatherineM

    New Mom in Training

  • Church Scholar
  • 23,292 posts

Posted 05 August 2012 - 07:20 PM

I believe Protestant is the important word in that article.

#5 ToJesusMyHeart

ToJesusMyHeart

    PM Super Alien

  • St. Hasa Perm
  • 1,100 posts
  • Catholic

Posted 05 August 2012 - 07:29 PM

Wait, wait, wait.

Was the consecrated bread that the dog ate the truly transubstantiated Body of Christ?

If so....For the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world!

#6 FutureCarmeliteClaire

FutureCarmeliteClaire

    PM Pham

  • Church Militant
  • 3,150 posts
  • Catholic

Posted 05 August 2012 - 07:58 PM

:o Oh my gosh.

#7 BG45

BG45

    To strive, to seek, and not to yield.

  • Church Militant
  • 19,156 posts

Posted 05 August 2012 - 10:18 PM

I literally gasped too, when I read this.

#8 USAirwaysIHS

USAirwaysIHS

    No one is more dumber than those who do not want to understand.

  • Church Militant
  • 8,201 posts

Posted 05 August 2012 - 10:37 PM

I would be very surprised if the consecration was valid. Most loosey goosey crapfests like that use leavened bread of some kind. Unleavened bread is seen as too stuffy.

#9 Amppax

Amppax

    I have nothing to contribute to this discussion

  • Church Militant
  • 3,629 posts

Posted 05 August 2012 - 11:15 PM

This makes me sick to my stomach.

#10 Ice_nine

Ice_nine

    PM Super Alien

  • St. Hasa Perm
  • 1,358 posts
  • Catholic

Posted 06 August 2012 - 12:32 PM

passing around communion?

sounds Anglican to me

#11 BG45

BG45

    To strive, to seek, and not to yield.

  • Church Militant
  • 19,156 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 01:41 PM

passing around communion?

sounds Anglican to me


Or Disciples of Christ.

#12 cappie

cappie

  • Catholic Clergy
  • 8,467 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 05:36 PM

The Age newspaper was holding Catholicism up to ridicule in an article published in the paper yesterday, Archbishop Denis Hart, of the Archdiocese of Melbourne, said in a statement.
The article, headlined "Every flock needs a shepherd", reports that at a Mass conducted by a group called Inclusive Catholics, the Blessed Sacrament was given to a dog.
Archbishop Hart said: “anyone who would feed the Eucharist to a dog is an abomination.”
In a letter to the editor of The Age yesteerday, the Archbishop said “Your article is in bad faith. It is the most fundamental and defining belief of Catholics that what you call ‘the consecrated bread and wine’ is the body and blood of Jesus Christ.”


“That you should choose to report the matter in the way that you did can only be understood as an attempt to hold Catholicism up to ridicule.
“Your integrity in this matter can be judged by asking whether, if something sacred to Judaism or Islam had similarly been desecrated, you would have treated the matter with such flippancy.”

http://www.cathnews....aspx?aeid=32607

#13 USAirwaysIHS

USAirwaysIHS

    No one is more dumber than those who do not want to understand.

  • Church Militant
  • 8,201 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 06:30 PM

passing around communion?

sounds Anglican to me

Every Anglican/Episcopal church I've been too in recent memory has had - and used - altar rails.
Something about glass houses....

Edited by USAirwaysIHS, 06 August 2012 - 06:31 PM.


#14 ToJesusMyHeart

ToJesusMyHeart

    PM Super Alien

  • St. Hasa Perm
  • 1,100 posts
  • Catholic

Posted 06 August 2012 - 09:29 PM

Oh, how I long for altar rails again.
And disciplinary action against priests such as this guy.
:frown:

#15 hotpink

hotpink

    PM Newbie

  • Very Likeable Non-Catholic
  • 56 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 09:32 PM

Didn't a donkey once bow at communion or something for that Francis guy? Why didn't God make the dog do that?

#16 MissyP89

MissyP89

    Perfect love casts out fear. <3

  • Church Militant
  • 14,682 posts
  • Catholic

Posted 06 August 2012 - 09:36 PM

Oh, lovely.

#17 FutureCarmeliteClaire

FutureCarmeliteClaire

    PM Pham

  • Church Militant
  • 3,150 posts
  • Catholic

Posted 06 August 2012 - 09:41 PM

Horrible. :/

#18 Annie12

Annie12

    PM Super Alien

  • St. Hasa Perm
  • 1,076 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 09:44 PM

My jaw almost hit the floor when I read this! Literally when I read this I was like :shock: :wall: and I was thinking that this guy must be :drunk: or :crazy: ....Wow...

#19 GeorgiiMichael

GeorgiiMichael

    PM Alien

  • St. Hasa Perm
  • 593 posts
  • Catholic

Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:42 PM

I would be very surprised if the consecration was valid. Most loosey goosey crapfests like that use leavened bread of some kind. Unleavened bread is seen as too stuffy.

Leavened bread is valid matter, it's just not licit in the Latin rite.

Or do Eastern Catholics and our Orthodox brothers and sisters not truly receive the Body and Blood of Christ?

Not to say that you're wrong in your assessment that the consecration was probably invalid, just that your reasoning was off. As for whether or not the consecration WAS invalid would depend on this man's Holy Orders and whether they were valid or not.

#20 USAirwaysIHS

USAirwaysIHS

    No one is more dumber than those who do not want to understand.

  • Church Militant
  • 8,201 posts

Posted 07 August 2012 - 07:59 AM

Interesting. I've always been under a mistaken impression.
More info, for those interested:
http://www.ewtn.com/...gy/zlitur85.htm