Obama Vs. Mccain Vs. Palin...

[Akalyte]

Jkaands, Obama is a socialist and socialists are funding his campaigns. He would like to radically change our government in a way that is quite frightening. With Obama as president america will look like china in no time.

Babies wont be human unless the state says so. He already supports infanticide and promised planned parenthood he would sign their freedom of choice act. and i dont care if you try to compare abortion to war or the war in iraq because that is plain stupid. Our men and women in uniform choose to join the army in turn, they choose war. On the other hand liberal democrats wont even given human babies a choice or a chance, not even babies who survive abortions.

to hell with liberal democrats and their false messiah.

[Vincent Vega]

[quote name='jkaands' post='1657473' date='Sep 17 2008, 03:21 PM']I thought that what I posted was very clever and factually accurate.

One of the many things I object to about McCain is the circumstances leading up to the breakup of his first marriage. He had married Carol, adopted her two sons by a previous marriage, and they had a daughter between them. Then he was shot down, captured an was a POW when Carol, his first wife, was in a terrible car crash, breaking her legs and pelvis in multiple places and leading to 23 operations and a loss of 4-5" in height. She did not tell John about this in the letters permitted her, and she felt he was undergoing something just as bad. He returned as a very handsome and ambitious war hero. While in Hawaii, he met at a reception a beautiful young (18 years younger than he) blond young women who was very rich. According to [i]an eye-witness[/i], a friend of his, he was smitten on the spot. He pursued her for the next six months, taking advantage of weekend trysts set up by friends. Finally he divorced Carol, who was crushed, and married The Heiress 5 weeks later. Carol never re-married.

All of this is well-documented, not innuendo.

When I married, I promised to[i] cherish my husband for better or worse, in sickness and in health.[/i] That was 35 years ago. We are still married.[/quote]
I don't like that either.
Which, as our friend dUSt said in another topic, I won't vote McCain for Pope.

I'm not voting for any of them based upon what they've done in the past (well, I won't be voting at all, this time around ), but for what they're saying they'll do to lead this country.

Edited September 17, 2008 by USAirwaysIHS

[Lil Red]

[quote name='Akalyte' post='1657591' date='Sep 17 2008, 05:22 PM']Our men and women in uniform choose to join the army in turn, they choose war. On the other hand liberal democrats wont even given human babies a choice or a chance, not even babies who survive abortions.[/quote]
+J.M.J.+
well said.

[missionseeker]

[quote name='jkaands' post='1657473' date='Sep 17 2008, 04:21 PM']I thought that what I posted was very clever and factually accurate.

One of the many things I object to about McCain is the circumstances leading up to the breakup of his first marriage. He had married Carol, adopted her two sons by a previous marriage, and they had a daughter between them. Then he was shot down, captured an was a POW when Carol, his first wife, was in a terrible car crash, breaking her legs and pelvis in multiple places and leading to 23 operations and a loss of 4-5" in height. She did not tell John about this in the letters permitted her, and she felt he was undergoing something just as bad. He returned as a very handsome and ambitious war hero. While in Hawaii, he met at a reception a beautiful young (18 years younger than he) blond young women who was very rich. According to [i]an eye-witness[/i], a friend of his, he was smitten on the spot. He pursued her for the next six months, taking advantage of weekend trysts set up by friends. Finally he divorced Carol, who was crushed, and married The Heiress 5 weeks later. Carol never re-married.

All of this is well-documented, not innuendo.

When I married, I promised to[i] cherish my husband for better or worse, in sickness and in health.[/i] That was 35 years ago. We are still married.[/quote]


*not condoning*
I read something written by Carol herself. They both seemed pretty... free before they were married, I don't think she is blameless. I have to wonder how much they both were psychologically affected by their respective traumas. From what she wrote, SHE changed her own opinion of herself more than he did. It just seems a very sad thing to me. (no excuse, but, still... we can't judge the details and intents behind EACH of their souls.

[Kirisutodo333]

[quote name='jkaands' post='1657407' date='Sep 17 2008, 02:28 PM']BARACK OBAMA VS SARAH PALIN AND JOHN McCAIN

I'm a little confused. Let me see if I have this straight.....

* If you grow up in Hawaii, raised by your grandparents, you're "exotic,
different."

[b]Try Indonesia[/b]

* Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, a quintessential American story.
[b]
This is actually true. You forgot the whole "story of her life" part...
[/b]
* If your name is Barack, you're a radical, unpatriotic Muslim.

[b]You forgot the whole Indonesia Muslim connection with this father...yeah that one.[/b]


* Name your kids Willow, Trig and Track, or Bristol, you're a ' maverick'.

[b]Oh, is that why she is a maverick? I thought it was because of her reform. Silly me...[/b]


* Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable.
[b]
Well...I'd take any community college over Harvard but you forget about the whole socialist/communist agenda mixed in with the shady Chicago associations...oh and the scary wife.[/b]


* Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you're well grounded.
[b]
Hey, at least she didn't give up. Good for her![/b]


* If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the first
black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive
that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law
professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over
750,000 people (that's more people than in [i]all of Alaska[/i]), become chairman of the state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people, while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs committees, you don't have
any real leadership experience.
[b]
"brilliant?" Yeah, this is not biased. I think the number is close to 143 days for the US Senate. You have to actually be present. Oh and serving on committees...please[/b]

* If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city council and
6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20 months as the
governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you're qualified to become
the country's second highest ranking executive.
[b]
I think the six years being as a mayor pretty much trumps all of Obama's experience. [/b]

* If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2
beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you're not a real
Christian.

[b]I think he goes to Church what twice a month like he said on O'Reilly. Oh and he likes to kill babies. Very Christian like.[/b]

* If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your
disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a Christian.

[b]Actually, he would then represent 50% of America. Not bad. Let see, kill babies or divorced wife, which one is greater. Oh he sinned, yes you're right...he's a Christian.[/b]

* If you teach children about sexual predators, you are irresponsible
and eroding the fiber of society.
[b]
Oh that's a great spin...this is so biased I need some Pepto.[/b]

* If, while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no other
option in sex education in your state's school system while your unwed teen
daughter ends up pregnant, you're very responsible.
[b]
Yes, this is actually correct. [/b]

* If your wife is a Harvard graduate lawyer who gave up a position in a
prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community,
then gave that up to raise a family, your family's values don't
represent America 's.

[b]Let's see, Communist vs. Capitalist. Yep, that's right.[/b]

* If your husband is nicknamed "First Dude", with at least one DWI conviction
and no college education, who didn't register to vote until age 25 and once was
a member of a group that hates America and advocated the secession of Alaska
from the USA, your family is extremely admirable.

[b]First dude...hehe, that's so cool...anyway what were you saying?[/b]

OK, much clearer now.
[b]
Yeah, me too.....whew![/b][/quote]

[kenrockthefirst]

[quote name='Norseman82' post='1657515' date='Sep 17 2008, 04:24 PM']The 13th district that is being quoted here is the 13th CONGRESSIONAL district in the western suburbs. Obama did not represent that district and he was never a member of the US House; he was a state senator who represented a district on the South Side of Chicago.[/quote]


[quote name='homeschoolmom' post='1657520' date='Sep 17 2008, 04:28 PM']Next![/quote]
Not true. "The [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Senate"]Illinois Senate[/url] is the upper chamber of the Illinois General Assembly, the legislative branch of the government of the state of Illinois in the United States. The body was created by the first state constitution adopted in 1818. The Illinois Senate is made up of 59 senators elected from individual legislative districts determined by population." "[url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama#State_legislator.2C_1997.E2.80.932004"]Obama was elected to the Illinois Senate in 1996[/url], succeeding State Senator Alice Palmer as Senator from the Illinois' [url="http://www.illinoisatlas.com/illinois/political/pdf/il_legdist_chicago.pdf"]13th District[/url] and [url="http://www.kwameraoul.com/images/stories/district_map.pdf"]this[/url], which then spanned Chicago South Side neighborhoods from Hyde Park-Kenwood south to South Shore and west to Chicago Lawn."

Next!

[FSM Sister]

Anyone who buys into the theory that raising taxes for the rich but cutting taxes for 95% is 1. possible, or 2. going to put more money in their pocket, is living in la la land. Here's what happens when you "cut" taxes.

Rich people are going to stay rich. If you tax them more, they will recover their temporary losses by doing - gues what - RAISING PRICES.

Who do you think owns businesses? Poor people? Stop fooling yourselves. Say you're the guy in the $200,000 annual income bracket, subject to Obama's higher taxes. What do you do for a living? You either own real estate, operate a business, work in a corporation, or work on Wall Street. If your taxes go up, you raise the cost of the service you provide to cover your losses. Who ends up paying? The consumer... you know, the one that pays $1100 less in taxes per year, but needs to spend $1500 per year more on gas, groceries, medical care, insurance, clothes, utilities, and housing.

Unless he is going in to the counterfiet money business, Obama can't make money appear out of nowhere. The money has to come from somewhere. It will come from us.

All these people that have been shelling out contribution money to Obama are going to come looking for a reward for thier investment. What did he promise to do for them in return? (MAKE MORE MONEY FOR THEM!)

Pray that God will have mercy on us, and that McCain/Palin win the election. If we do not vote for them, how dare we pray that God will help us win the fight against terrorism in Afghanistan when we commit terrorism in the womb.

[jckinsman]

Very Interesting and entertaining.