Era Might Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Ash Wednesday' date='07 February 2010 - 11:42 PM' timestamp='1265604146' post='2053115'] As you should still be. I'm from Seattle. I understand your pain. [/quote] LOL @ 1996 NBA Finals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Wednesday Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Era Might' date='07 February 2010 - 11:44 PM' timestamp='1265604244' post='2053119'] LOL @ 1996 NBA Finals. [/quote] like I really care about the NBA. I was talking about the superbowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Era Might Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Ash Wednesday' date='07 February 2010 - 11:50 PM' timestamp='1265604633' post='2053122'] like I really care about the NBA. I was talking about the superbowl. [/quote] LOL @ trading Jason Varitek and Derek Lowe to the Red Sox for Heathcliff Slocumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Wednesday Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Era Might' date='07 February 2010 - 11:52 PM' timestamp='1265604738' post='2053124'] LOL @ trading Jason Varitek and Derek Lowe to the Red Sox for Heathcliff Slocumb. [/quote] Don't actually follow baseball. Are you finished? Because you are seriously getting on my nerves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Era Might Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Ash Wednesday' date='07 February 2010 - 11:54 PM' timestamp='1265604878' post='2053125']Because you are seriously getting on my nerves. [/quote] Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Normile Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Era Might' date='07 February 2010 - 11:29 PM' timestamp='1265603383' post='2053107'] Fair enough. We could go back and forth, but I have no problem with people arguing that Montana is better than Brady. I don't even have a problem with people arguing that Manning is better than Brady, even though I disagree. But what I do not like is when people act like Brady is not in the same conversation as Manning. As far as I am concerned, they are both in the same conversation for greatest quarterback of all-time...along with Montana, Elway, Marino, Unitas, etc. [/quote] Wow, you totally left out Terry Bradshaw, the only four superbowl winning quaterback, the only one to ever win two back to back superbowls. This was all done with the same team, while he was battling severe debilitating depression. There are none that come close to his acomplishments, if not for having to battle depression, worsened by a divorce, he would have probably had six rings himself. His numbers were fantastic, despite being on a team which had two fantastic running backs in Franco Harris and Rocky Bleir, in an era where running was the focal point of a team. ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havok579257 Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Era Might' date='07 February 2010 - 11:29 PM' timestamp='1265603383' post='2053107'] Fair enough. We could go back and forth, but I have no problem with people arguing that Montana is better than Brady. I don't even have a problem with people arguing that Manning is better than Brady, even though I disagree. But what I do not like is when people act like Brady is not in the same conversation as Manning. As far as I am concerned, they are both in the same conversation for greatest quarterback of all-time...along with Montana, Elway, Marino, Unitas, etc. [/quote] brady and manning are ahead of elway and marino. marino never won a single sb and elway choked away 4 sb's before winning 2. right now the way i see it, brady is 3rd greatest qb of all time(3 sb wins with no name recievers), manning is 4th(his playoff record knocks him below brady), farve is 5th (he holds every qb record and has a sb win under his belt). montana right now is number 1. the only arguement "right now" you can make besides montana as greatest qb of all time is otto graham. the guy took his team to 10 championship games and won 8 of them. cause all otto did was win championships. although i will say peyton, farve and manning's career's are not done yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havok579257 Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Ed Normile' date='08 February 2010 - 12:25 AM' timestamp='1265606708' post='2053142'] Wow, you totally left out Terry Bradshaw, the only four superbowl winning quaterback, the only one to ever win two back to back superbowls. This was all done with the same team, while he was battling severe debilitating depression. There are none that come close to his acomplishments, if not for having to battle depression, worsened by a divorce, he would have probably had six rings himself. His numbers were fantastic, despite being on a team which had two fantastic running backs in Franco Harris and Rocky Bleir, in an era where running was the focal point of a team. ed [/quote] montana also won 4 sb's. montana also won back to back superbowls. montana had better stats than bradshaw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Normile Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 (edited) [quote name='havok579257' date='08 February 2010 - 12:35 AM' timestamp='1265607354' post='2053152'] montana also won 4 sb's. montana also won back to back superbowls. montana had better stats than bradshaw. [/quote] My friend, Montana won three super bowls, I guess you forget Steve Young who won their fourth! Also he only won 1 time back to back, both against the Bengals. Perhaps this , the NFL official site will help edify you on your stats for future reference [url="http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/history/recap/sbxxix"]NFL.Com Suoerbowl[/url] Excuse the misspelling on the link, its valid, not an wiki thing that is modified by nutty fans to prove a point, but the actual NFL Superbowl history site. You bring up montana stats, of course his passing stats was better as he mostly threw the ball, the Steelers were a running team, in an era where running was the norm, and despite this Terry Bradshaw is still the only QB to win four rings, and two back to back Superbowls, the years were IX 1975, X 1976, XII 1979, XIV 1980. Name any other who came close! And all this battling severe depression! ed Edited February 8, 2010 by Ed Normile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havok579257 Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Ed Normile' date='08 February 2010 - 12:54 AM' timestamp='1265608465' post='2053168'] My friend, Montana won three super bowls, I guess you forget Steve Young who won their fourth! Also he only won 1 time back to back, both against the Bengals. Perhaps this , the NFL official site will help edify you on your stats for future reference [url="http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/history/recap/sbxxix"]NFL.Com Suoerbowl[/url] Excuse the misspelling on the link, its valid, not an wiki thing that is modified by nutty fans to prove a point, but the actual NFL Superbowl history site. You bring up montana stats, of course his passing stats was better as he mostly threw the ball, the Steelers were a running team, in an era where running was the norm, and despite this Terry Bradshaw is still the only QB to win four rings, and two back to back Superbowls, the years were IX 1975, X 1976, XII 1979, XIV 1980. Name any other who came close! And all this battling severe depression! ed [/quote] i am sorry my friend, you are wrong. montana won 4 superbowls, 49ers won a total of 5. they also didn't win back to back against the bengals. they won the first won in 88 against the bengals and then in 89 against the broncos. 1981- beat the bengals 1984- beat the dolphins 1988- beat the bengals 1989- beat the broncos young won his superbowl against the chargers in 1995. joe montana also won 3 sb mvp's, bradshaw only won 2. montana also has the greatest superbowl game winning drive in history. also the steelers were in the suberbowls first and foremost because of their defenses. the defense of the steelers is one of the greatest defenses in history. the 49er's were in the superbowls because of joe cool. also remember joe did not even have rice in his first sb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Wednesday Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Era Might' date='08 February 2010 - 12:09 AM' timestamp='1265605788' post='2053133'] Sorry. [/quote] It's ok. That nerve gets sore at times and I just felt bad for mcts because I know how much she loves her team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcts Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='Ash Wednesday' date='08 February 2010 - 01:04 AM' timestamp='1265609071' post='2053174'] It's ok. That nerve gets sore at times and I just felt bad for mcts because I know how much she loves her team. [/quote] aww, thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominicansoul Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='mcts' date='07 February 2010 - 11:04 PM' timestamp='1265601844' post='2053091'] Being a fan isn't about being "right" or "wrong". It's about love of the team, through thick and thin. This season, even this game would still be considered "thick" for the Colts. This is only the second time they've played in a Super Bowl game since they moved to Indianapolis. [/quote] ...and they totally played hard tonite! It was an awesome game...the back and forth left me sitting on the edge of my seat! One of the best Superbowls to date, imho! In fact, there were many times during the game that the Colts showed their superiority to the Saints. I mean, the whole first half belonged to them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeenanParkerII Posted February 8, 2010 Author Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote]In fact, there were many times during the game that the Colts showed their superiority to the Saints. I mean, the whole first half belonged to them... [/quote] Totally true. I was rooting for the Saints, but the colts were definitely better. Cleaner passing plays and solid D especially. The Saints just really wanted it, and got that shmexi interception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scardella Posted February 8, 2010 Share Posted February 8, 2010 [quote name='dominicansoul' date='08 February 2010 - 06:48 AM' timestamp='1265626094' post='2053268'] In fact, there were many times during the game that the Colts showed their superiority to the Saints. I mean, the whole first half belonged to them... [/quote] First quarter, yes. Whole first half, no. The Saints were just getting warmed up. Plus... who won? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now