Who Can Faithful Catholics Actually Vote For?

[cmotherofpirl]

Well?
Give me choices and good reasons please.

[Jaime]

and why not McCain?

[adt6247]

I'd say there's no choices definite yet. Let's see who's running come November. I tend to vote Constitution Party, but they have not yet chosen a candidate.

[cmotherofpirl]

[quote name='hot stuff' post='1463407' date='Feb 15 2008, 02:31 PM']and why not McCain?[/quote]
[url="http://www.catholiccitizens.org/press/contentview.asp?c=44718"]http://www.catholiccitizens.org/press/cont...iew.asp?c=44718[/url]

[goldenchild17]

wow that bothers me more than anything else I've heard or read about him, and that's saying a lot.

[Jaime]

McCain does not support abortion.

If you want to waste your vote on somebody who cannot win, and help the culture of death, that is your sin, not mine.

[ardillacid]

[quote name='hot stuff' post='1463521' date='Feb 15 2008, 03:38 PM']McCain does not support abortion.

If you want to waste your vote on somebody who cannot win, and help the culture of death, that is your sin, not mine.[/quote]
wOw.


lol

[Jaime]

I was paraphrasing

[quote name='cmotherofpirl' post='294719' date='Aug 4 2004, 03:57 PM']Bush does not support abortion.

If you want to waste your vote on somebody who cannot win, and help the culture of death, that is your sin, not mine.[/quote]

[ardillacid]

I had concluded this already. But it was amusing.

[Jaime]

I can't get nothin by you

[Farsight one]

People can still do a write-in vote, just to remind you.

[adt6247]

[quote name='Farsight one' post='1463546' date='Feb 15 2008, 05:15 PM']People can still do a write-in vote, just to remind you.[/quote]
I may do that this year. I couldn't stomach voting for McCain any more than Hillary or Obama. My conscience is informed, and I find zero discernible difference in life issues, as well as secondary issues I also care about.

[KnightofChrist]

[quote name='hot stuff' post='1463530' date='Feb 15 2008, 04:54 PM']I was paraphrasing[/quote]

Wow... we have an [url="http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/archivist.htm"]Archivist[/url], part [url="http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/evilclown.htm"]Evil Clown[/url].

[Jaime]

[quote name='KnightofChrist' post='1463617' date='Feb 15 2008, 05:28 PM']Wow... we have an [url="http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/archivist.htm"]Archivist[/url], part [url="http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/evilclown.htm"]Evil Clown[/url].[/quote]

you have no sense of humor


I kid


I'm also trying to keep this topic in the realm of real. And I will call out people who are radically changing their position on third party voting. If people are going to take a 180 degree change on their beliefs, I don't think its out of line to call them out on it.

I don't have a problem with third party voting. I have a problem with people who defended Bush by using the Church as a defense then use the Church as a reason not to vote for McCain. I would think you would have a problem with that as well.

[Lounge Daddy]

[quote name='hot stuff' post='1463783' date='Feb 15 2008, 10:15 PM']I don't have a problem with third party voting. I have a problem with people who defended Bush by using the Church as a defense then use the Church as a reason not to vote for McCain. I would think you would have a problem with that as well.[/quote]

President Bush was likely to appoint conservative justices to the Supreme Court for one, hot stuff. And President Bush did just that.

John McCain would appoint judges that would agree with his own legislative philosophy. And McCain's legislative philosophy includes using the full power of the federal government for the purpose of banning pro-life organizations from advocating for pro-life candidates (among other free speech violations).

Edited February 16, 2008 by Lounge Daddy