dairygirl4u2c Posted April 12, 2008 Share Posted April 12, 2008 (edited) if mccain is more prolife than neutral.. then he's giving a run of the money to those who effectively vote prochoice: prolifeish, choice and prolifeish, prolifeish... v. choice, life and choice, choice. prolifeish, choice at worst bc of mccain.... and choice, life at best for obama.... assuming the optimal condition for those anti mccains (which isn't probable). so, they're pulling the odds... going out on a limb, doing what's the least probable prolife position,,, to get 95% prolife instead of 85-90%...... Edited April 12, 2008 by dairygirl4u2c Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Posted April 14, 2008 Share Posted April 14, 2008 I'm guessing the debate would continue if my point was not hitting so close to home. I'm guessing that neither Al nor Dismas want to refute my last suggestion that they were both voting their politics and not their faith since the thread seems to have died. I'm also guessing that if someone starts up a thread about how they are gonna vote for obama or hillary, those two will probably keep quiet on that as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XIX Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 What if one were to assert the following: Hilary > Obama because both are 100% pro-death, but Hilary isn't as committed to the abortion issue as Obama... then... still voting for McCain or at least voting third party while rooting for McCain in the general, on the basis that McCain >>>>> Hilary Not that I think that, but...you know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now