Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

National Emergency Centers Act (hr 645)


Lounge Daddy

Recommended Posts

Ok, I see what you were talking about, C'Mom.

January 22, 2009. [url="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-645"]Congress is passing legislation "National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645" to "direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations."[/url]

What the H are they preparing for? Federal control of digital television. Over 20,000 uniformed military to be deployed into the US. A court ruling that declares warrantless wiretaps perfectly legal. Compulsory military for our children. And now this?

And all within the past 6 months... [i]if[/i] that. Again, jiminy christmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cmotherofpirl

[quote name='Lounge Daddy' post='1772709' date='Feb 5 2009, 01:54 AM']Ok, I see what you were talking about, C'Mom.

January 22, 2009. [url="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-645"]Congress is passing legislation "National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645" to "direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations."[/url]

What the H are they preparing for? Federal control of digital television. Over 20,000 uniformed military to be deployed into the US. A court ruling that declares warrantless wiretaps perfectly legal. Compulsory military for our children. And now this?

And all within the past 6 months... [i]if[/i] that. Again, jiminy christmas.[/quote]
Innocuous, unless put all together...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note that the act demands that "the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish [b]not fewer than 6[/b] national emergency centers on military installations." Not "no more than 6" ...but at the very least 6 centers. They want a lot of these emergency centers.

And if these are national emergency centers, then these would be FEMA camps, wouldn't they? Which means that with the declaration of a national emergency, the Federal Government can do whatever they want with these camps.

Edited by Lounge Daddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

eagle_eye222001
:yawn:

This is expected. Obama has yet to surprise me. Kinda funny I think. People start questioning him and it's like, hey, he's a far left person...it's expected.

I take comfort in that the Pope :pope: is filling the diocese vacancies pretty quickely and trying to unite the separated parts.

Obama will advance his agenda. And the Church will be ready to respond along with many other Christians.

----------------
Now playing: [url="http://www.foxytunes.com/artist/nickelback/track/if+everyone+cared"]Nickelback - If Everyone Cared[/url]
via [url="http://www.foxytunes.com/signatunes/"]FoxyTunes[/url]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you afraid of the government being able to put people in camps concentrating them in strategic locations?

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='eagle_eye222001' post='1772720' date='Feb 5 2009, 02:05 AM']This is expected. Obama has yet to surprise me.[/quote]
True.

But Bush was President when the order to begin making arrangements for 20,000 uniformed military to be deployed into our own cities between now and 2012. And Bush was also still President when the secret Federal court declared the secret Federal wiretap program to be legal, because the ruling actually came down last fall. So, if partisan jabs are to be made, I have to say that this is a "republicrat" thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Apotheoun' post='1772725' date='Feb 5 2009, 02:11 AM']Are you afraid of the government being able to put people in camps concentrating them in strategic locations?

:)[/quote]
Naaaaah. I trust the Federal Government completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Lounge Daddy' post='1772728' date='Feb 4 2009, 11:13 PM']Naaaaah. I trust the Federal Government completely.[/quote]
What could be wrong with concentration camps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eagle_eye222001

[quote name='Lounge Daddy' post='1772726' date='Feb 5 2009, 01:11 AM']True.

But Bush was President when the order to begin making arrangements for 20,000 uniformed military to be deployed into our own cities between now and 2012. And Bush was also still President when the secret Federal court declared the secret Federal wiretap program to be legal, because the ruling actually came down last fall. So, if partisan jabs are to be made, I have to say that this is a "republicrat" thing.[/quote]

Can't Obama undo it?
----------------
Now playing: [url="http://www.foxytunes.com/artist/red+hot+chili+peppers/track/cmon+girl"]Red Hot Chili Peppers - C'mon Girl[/url]
via [url="http://www.foxytunes.com/signatunes/"]FoxyTunes[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='eagle_eye222001' post='1772732' date='Feb 5 2009, 02:14 AM']Can't Obama undo it?
----------------
Now playing: [url="http://www.foxytunes.com/artist/red+hot+chili+peppers/track/cmon+girl"]Red Hot Chili Peppers - C'mon Girl[/url]
via [url="http://www.foxytunes.com/signatunes/"]FoxyTunes[/url][/quote]
Why would he? Like Apotheoun said, what could be wrong with concentration camps all strategically located all over the US? It's probably day care or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cmotherofpirl

[quote name='eagle_eye222001' post='1772732' date='Feb 5 2009, 02:14 AM']Can't Obama undo it?
----------------
Now playing: [url="http://www.foxytunes.com/artist/red+hot+chili+peppers/track/cmon+girl"]Red Hot Chili Peppers - C'mon Girl[/url]
via [url="http://www.foxytunes.com/signatunes/"]FoxyTunes[/url][/quote]

Ah these were bills he would have voted on, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O.K.,

With HR645 we would have a neat and safe place to hold people during national emergencies. These may also include the emergencies caused by political malcontents.

This coupled with the speach that the current occupant of the white house made on the 20th of July in 2008 where he said he wanted a civilian national security force as strong and well funded as the military, and the tone become a bit more sinister.

It was a very short series of steps that led to the formation of the S.S., and the other fun-filled elements in WWII.

Let the merriment and glee begin...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Raphael' post='1773045' date='Feb 5 2009, 01:47 PM'][img]http://tempus44.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/fasces.jpg[/img][/quote]

I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homeschoolmom

[quote name='Lounge Daddy' post='1772709' date='Feb 5 2009, 12:54 AM']Ok, I see what you were talking about, C'Mom.

January 22, 2009. [url="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-645"]Congress is passing legislation "National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645" to "direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations."[/url]

What the H are they preparing for? Federal control of digital television. Over 20,000 uniformed military to be deployed into the US. A court ruling that declares warrantless wiretaps perfectly legal. Compulsory military for our children. And now this?

And all within the past 6 months... [i]if[/i] that. Again, jiminy christmas.[/quote]
But they've managed to consider cutting one day of postal delivery...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...