Lounge Daddy Posted April 14, 2009 Author Share Posted April 14, 2009 [quote name='rkwright' post='1835276' date='Apr 14 2009, 01:53 PM']Whats wrong with cruise ships going through there?[/quote] Gosh -- quite a bit. Especially if they know people are getting taken there. Again, if the Western Governments were interested in peace -- they wouldn't respond with violence. It's not difficult. They are capable of directing all ships to not go there, apologizing for the dumping that their companies have done while Governments looked the other way (thus making the Governments guilty as well), and paying for the cleanup. Instead they are allowing ships to continue to travel there. Why? Perhaps this gives Governments an excuse to use military force in Somalia, prop up another "friendly" dictator who will allow dumping there. If it sounds like I am accusing our Government, and other Governments, of putting citizens in harms way on purpose -- it's because I am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lounge Daddy Posted April 14, 2009 Author Share Posted April 14, 2009 [quote name='VoTeckam' post='1835278' date='Apr 14 2009, 01:56 PM']Holy Moly. If these pirates are spending this money on food I think the larger issue is the outrageous price of food in Somalia. Millions of dollars to feed a family! What and outrage! We should do something about this![/quote] Food and medical supplies? I would imagine so. Especially when their land and the waters have been used as a toxic dumping ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkwright Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 [quote name='Lounge Daddy' post='1835363' date='Apr 14 2009, 02:52 PM']Gosh -- quite a bit. Especially if they know people are getting taken there. Again, if the Western Governments were interested in peace -- they wouldn't respond with violence. It's not difficult. They are capable of directing all ships to not go there, apologizing for the dumping that their companies have done while Governments looked the other way (thus making the Governments guilty as well), and paying for the cleanup. Instead they are allowing ships to continue to travel there. Why? Perhaps this gives Governments an excuse to use military force in Somalia, prop up another "friendly" dictator who will allow dumping there. If it sounds like I am accusing our Government, and other Governments, of putting citizens in harms way on purpose -- it's because I am.[/quote] Its not their ocean. They're in international waters. Thank God our government is willing to stick up to a bunch of guys in zodiacs trying to scare people away from international waters. You're getting out there on these conspiracy theories... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lounge Daddy Posted April 14, 2009 Author Share Posted April 14, 2009 [quote name='rkwright' post='1834574' date='Apr 13 2009, 10:46 PM']I'm struggling to find any recent stories of dumping in the area...[/quote] Too bad many energy companies also own huge chunks of the msm, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkwright Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 [quote name='Lounge Daddy' post='1835462' date='Apr 14 2009, 04:41 PM']Too bad many energy companies also own huge chunks of the msm, eh?[/quote] Except its not US companies doing the dumping... They were primarily Italian. Last I checked, Italian power companies were not the owners of msm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lounge Daddy Posted April 14, 2009 Author Share Posted April 14, 2009 [quote name='rkwright' post='1835460' date='Apr 14 2009, 05:37 PM']Its not their ocean. They're in international waters. Thank God our government is willing to stick up to a bunch of guys in zodiacs trying to scare people away from international waters. You're getting out there on these conspiracy theories...[/quote] Gosh, Somali waters were dumped full of toxic waste. But our Governments aren't interested in paying for clean-up that our Governments are responsible for. Do you honestly hold the position that the Somalis should not defend themselves, should not demand that our Governments pay for cleanup of their land, and should stick to fishing in toxic waters that our Government created for them? As for "conspiracy theories," [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Lusitania#Last_voyage_and_sinking"]I was referring to the Lusitania. [/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lounge Daddy Posted April 14, 2009 Author Share Posted April 14, 2009 I'm kinda' done with this topic. I accept that many people think that only other people should be held accountable for their actions. Our Federal State has done a great job of influencing people to confuse liberty and license. Statism does that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkwright Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 [quote name='Lounge Daddy' post='1835475' date='Apr 14 2009, 04:51 PM']Gosh, Somali waters were dumped full of toxic waste. But our Governments aren't interested in paying for clean-up that our Governments are responsible for. Do you honestly hold the position that the Somalis should not defend themselves, should not demand that our Governments pay for cleanup of their land, and should stick to fishing in toxic waters that our Government created for them? As for "conspiracy theories," [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Lusitania#Last_voyage_and_sinking"]I was referring to the Lusitania. [/url][/quote] They can defend themselves at the UN. Do you honestly hold that taking hostages, of ships that are not carrying waste or fishing, is ok? Do you honestly hold that taking hostages no matter what the reason is ok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VoTeckam Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 [url="http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/africa/04/15/somalia.pirates/index.html"]http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/africa/04/15...ates/index.html[/url] The latest ship that was attacked was carrying food aid from the US for African Nations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' post='1812820' date='Mar 21 2009, 12:21 AM']From the sounds of it, they treat their prisoners quite decently (for the most part),[/quote] Taking people hostage always includes the threat of executing them. It's not decent and I have no problem condemning them for attacking non-combatants. They are an enemy. They are also crybabies, complaining that their armed brutes were shot down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now