KnightofChrist Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='19 November 2009 - 07:28 PM' timestamp='1258676919' post='2005915'] Btw, to the Melvaran mud flea who gave me a minus one: I wasn't even making fun of HCF, read her sidebar info. [/quote] Melvaran mud fleas are a delicacy of questionable quality.
Laudate_Dominum Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='KnightofChrist' date='19 November 2009 - 07:31 PM' timestamp='1258677084' post='2005917'] Melvaran mud fleas are a delicacy of questionable quality. [/quote] +1
HisChildForever Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='19 November 2009 - 07:12 PM' timestamp='1258675977' post='2005907'] How dare someone give me a minus one. Either we're going down, or they are. [/quote] Yeah I thawght that was weird.
KnightofChrist Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Yeah... totally weird... musta been some goofball of a goober. in other words... whoops and sorry
Laudate_Dominum Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='KnightofChrist' date='19 November 2009 - 08:58 PM' timestamp='1258682334' post='2005946'] Yeah... totally weird... musta been some goofball of a goober. in other words... whoops and sorry [/quote] Thanks for having integrity sir.
Jesus_lol Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='19 November 2009 - 12:55 PM' timestamp='1258664107' post='2005754'] I think this is the most maliciously sarcastic post I've ever made. I'm standing by it. [/quote] It is a good start... you have taken the first step, excellent. [img]http://media.gamespy.com/columns/image/article/550/550110/the-top-10-unannounced-star-wars-games-and-guides--20040921033110332.jpg[/img] [quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='19 November 2009 - 02:48 PM' timestamp='1258670888' post='2005852'] My bad... Maybe some brownies with herbs?[s] j/k[/s] [/quote] fixed. [quote name='KnightofChrist' date='19 November 2009 - 03:18 PM' timestamp='1258672705' post='2005883'] Yet anger and emotions do not invalidate an argument. [/quote] objectively, but they tend to weaken its effectiveness unless you are debating the likeminded.
Fidei Defensor Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='Socrates' date='19 November 2009 - 06:19 PM' timestamp='1258676376' post='2005911'] Well perhaps the "rationalist" can explain to us superstitious dolts what a human fetus is, if not a human being. I believe we've pretty well established that it's human and alive (i.e. not a corpse). [/quote] Make me.
ardillacid Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='19 November 2009 - 05:48 PM' timestamp='1258670888' post='2005852'] My bad... Maybe some brownies with herbs? j/k [/quote] You're already on the DEA's list with your talk of growing plants in your house using advanced hydroponics, I don't know why you keep digging your hole...
Laudate_Dominum Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='notardillacid' date='20 November 2009 - 01:06 AM' timestamp='1258697202' post='2006125'] You're already on the DEA's list with your talk of growing plants in your house using advanced hydroponics, I don't know why you keep digging your hole... [/quote]
Winchester Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='fidei defensor' date='19 November 2009 - 06:16 PM' timestamp='1258672592' post='2005880'] You can get angry and emotional about whatever you want. But anger and emotions aren't an argument. [/quote] I don't see the problem with calling a horse a horse. The sensitivity issue isn't the problem of the person speaking plain truth, it's the problem of the weaklings who won't take the next step in their moral evolution. Being a scumbag, my biggest problem with the pro-abortion camp is their utter cowardice. They refuse logic and ignore science. The personhood argument I've always understood. It's asinine and those who will take it to the logical conclusion are few and far between and they tend to be shrill weaklings on the order of Peter "Extend animals rights because I'm afraid of will to power" Singer. I am a fan of undermining, which is what I think you're in favor of. Keep asking questions and let them paint themselves into a corner. I have been there and done that. They walk across the paint, they claim it's dry and they hurl epithets. I try periodically to be nice and kind, but the utter stupidity (as displayed on here regarding intrinsic evil and imputability of sins) saps the little tank of that fuel I carry. I understand their arguments. Their arguments are without merit.
JimR-OCDS Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='CatherineM' date='19 November 2009 - 05:04 PM' timestamp='1258664671' post='2005763'] My brother John was 24 weeks at delivery. That was also in a time before ultrasounds, 1949. He's not just lucky to be alive, but he is lucky to not be blind. They didn't know how to regulate oxygen good in incubators back then, and some premmies ended up blind from too much. This is why I don't like leaving these decisions in the hands of humans, be they doctor or bureaucrat. If we allow God to make those decisions from Conception to natural death then we don't have to worry about making a mistake about which child should live or die. I have nothing against doctors, my brother Ray is an internist. He didn't go into OBGYN because he said he didn't like getting woken up at night. [/quote] God is more likely to work through the skills of the doctor, than a government bureaucrat. Your brother and my son, would not be alive if not for the doctors who saved him. They are very pro-life. Jim
JimR-OCDS Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 (edited) [quote name='fidei defensor' date='19 November 2009 - 06:09 PM' timestamp='1258668591' post='2005821'] It means that I give up trying to debate it, I'm just saying it so that everyone can go "omgz abortion is MuRdErrrRR111!!one!" but I don't have to respond to it. [/quote] Probably the wisest position to take. Jim Edited November 20, 2009 by JimR-OCDS
Winchester Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='JimR-OCDS' date='20 November 2009 - 09:04 AM' timestamp='1258725863' post='2006166'] God is more likely to work through the skills of the doctor, than a government bureaucrat. [/quote] I missed that revelation. Is it in the Book of Percentages? I could never get into that part of the Bible.
Fidei Defensor Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 [quote name='Winchester' date='20 November 2009 - 08:08 AM' timestamp='1258726094' post='2006172'] I missed that revelation. Is it in the Book of Percentages? I could never get into that part of the Bible. [/quote] Yes. It's also more likely that God will wear one purple shoe and a flip flop on the day of the final judgment.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now