Happy_Catholic Posted January 26, 2010 Posted January 26, 2010 I'm not going to pretend I know anything about football or the superbowl or anything along those lines. What I do understand is a few pro-abortion groups are getting their panties in a bunch over a pro-life ad that's set to screen. http://www.lifenews.com/nat5926.html It really just goes to show that the pro-abortion movement is about silencing the opposition. I mean, nothing's stopping them from making their own baby killing ad. They support the freedom to kill another human being, but it looks like freedom of speech and expression are just too much.
havok579257 Posted January 26, 2010 Posted January 26, 2010 [quote name='Happy_Catholic' date='26 January 2010 - 02:57 PM' timestamp='1264535837' post='2045109'] I'm not going to pretend I know anything about football or the superbowl or anything along those lines. What I do understand is a few pro-abortion groups are getting their panties in a bunch over a pro-life ad that's set to screen. http://www.lifenews.com/nat5926.html It really just goes to show that the pro-abortion movement is about silencing the opposition. I mean, nothing's stopping them from making their own baby killing ad. They support the freedom to kill another human being, but it looks like freedom of speech and expression are just too much. [/quote] its because they realize how wrong they are. they know if they put an ad on tv for abortions, people would realize how evil it is. they know they are wrong, so they want to disrupt the message of the good.
Thy Geekdom Come Posted January 26, 2010 Posted January 26, 2010 [quote name='havok579257' date='26 January 2010 - 04:32 PM' timestamp='1264541563' post='2045160'] its because they realize how wrong they are. they know if they put an ad on tv for abortions, people would realize how evil it is. they know they are wrong, so they want to disrupt the message of the good. [/quote] This is exactly correct. One of my students let me borrow a little plastic model of a baby at 12 weeks fetal development. Looks very similar to a fully grown baby at birth, plus the full umbilical cord. Not surprisingly, the women in the class who favored abortion kept telling me how disgusting it was and how gross it was for me to have such a thing in my classroom. They couldn't stop making comments about how disturbing they thought it was. It was very telling for me. Those who are in favor of abortion, especially those adamantly in favor of it, typically describe perfectly natural and beautiful images of babies (born or pre-born) as disgusting, sick, gross, ugly, etc. They also will tell you how much they can't stand kids, how big a responsibility kids are, how much kids will ruin your lives, etc. I'm convinced that they hold these views because they are trying to justify their opinions regarding abortion. If a fetus is a baby and a human person, then they are the ugly, disgusting ones, but if the babies are the disgusting ones that ruin lives, then abortion is somehow magically okay. People living in sin often hate people living in grace. It's a similar concept. It's a guilt thing.
Happy_Catholic Posted January 26, 2010 Author Posted January 26, 2010 [quote name='Raphael' date='26 January 2010 - 04:40 PM' timestamp='1264542028' post='2045165'] This is exactly correct. One of my students let me borrow a little plastic model of a baby at 12 weeks fetal development. Looks very similar to a fully grown baby at birth, plus the full umbilical cord. [/quote] I have a little ten week model I attached to my keyring. It has started many an interesting conversation!
add Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 CBS is reportedly selling Super Bowl ads for around $2.5million to $2.8 million. the anti-life people are trying to force CBS to drop the ad because it's controversial? if this ad really is controversial, What's next? banning ads promoting eating fruits and vegetables?
add Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 [quote name='apparently' date='27 January 2010 - 09:21 PM' timestamp='1264641679' post='2046130'] CBS is reportedly selling Super Bowl ads for around $2.5million to $2.8 million. [/quote] If the ad stops just one woman from aborting her baby, it will have been worth it.
JimR-OCDS Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 They use to stay away from showing political ads during the Super Bowl. However, the economy being such, CBS couldn't get enough ads to fill all the time slots, so they let this ad through. I understand its going to cost $1 million for 30 seconds. Jim
Veridicus Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 (edited) [quote name='apparently' date='27 January 2010 - 07:21 PM' timestamp='1264641679' post='2046130'] if this ad really is controversial, What's next? banning ads promoting eating fruits and vegetables? [/quote] As a carnivore who supplements his diet of pure meat with vitamin pills, I find these fruit and vegetable adds quite disgusting and culturally ignorant. Edited January 28, 2010 by Veridicus
eagle_eye222001 Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 [quote name='Happy_Catholic' date='26 January 2010 - 02:57 PM' timestamp='1264535837' post='2045109'] ...It really just goes to show that the pro-abortion movement is about silencing the opposition. I mean, nothing's stopping them from making their own baby killing ad. They support the freedom to kill another human being, but it looks like freedom of speech and expression are just too much. [/quote] I've seen a Planned Parenthood promo and it explicitly shows itself as a hypocritical group in terms of freedom of speech, debate, etc. [quote name='Happy_Catholic' date='26 January 2010 - 05:15 PM' timestamp='1264544100' post='2045192'] I have a little ten week model I attached to my keyring. It has started many an interesting conversation! [/quote] I bet it has!
HisChildForever Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 Pro-abortion advocates are "allowed" to get offended when someone from the "other side" speaks up, but Heaven forbid Pro-Life advocates get upset at the abortion movement.
add Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 [quote name='Veridicus' date='28 January 2010 - 05:05 PM' timestamp='1264712744' post='2046625'] As a carnivore who supplements his diet of pure meat with vitamin pills, I find these fruit and vegetable adds quite disgusting and culturally ignorant. [/quote] on that note, do you support "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals" (PETA) in there quest to replace Punxsutawney Phil, the groundhog with a robot?
Veridicus Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) [quote name='apparently' date='28 January 2010 - 03:44 PM' timestamp='1264715058' post='2046660'] on that note, do you support "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals" (PETA) in there quest to replace Punxsutawney Phil, the groundhog with a robot? [/quote] PETA's statement is quite possibly the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. This groundhog is likely the most luxuriously living groundhog on the planet. He probably has acres of dirt and grubs to eat. Probably bring in female groundhog companions. And once a year everyone stops what they're doing to pay heed to him as the prognosticator of prognosticators. All the celery a hog could want. That would be like replacing the Prince of Wales with a robot. Edited January 29, 2010 by Veridicus
ThePenciledOne Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Hey it doesn't really matter, if the pro lifers have the cash then the ad won't drop. In the end all the corporations want is money.
Veridicus Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 [quote name='ThePenciledOne' date='28 January 2010 - 06:39 PM' timestamp='1264725546' post='2046770'] In the end all the corporations want is money. [/quote] I wish it were that simple. In some cases these corporations have even sacrificed money in order not to undermine their progressive liberal agenda makers.
add Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 The monetary cost of a Superbowl commercial for soda/cola,for example is superficial compared to the sales generated by the airing of said. Likewise if this super-advertising convinces just [u]one[/u] mother to reconsider the termination of her non-viable tissue mass affliction, then the super-monetary advertising cost is justifiable, as is or was the soda/cola ad
ThePenciledOne Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 [quote name='Veridicus' date='28 January 2010 - 09:00 PM' timestamp='1264726814' post='2046792'] I wish it were that simple. In some cases these corporations have even sacrificed money in order not to undermine their progressive liberal agenda makers. [/quote] Maybe, but I still wouldn't necessarily go that far either.
Winchester Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 [quote name='Veridicus' date='28 January 2010 - 07:30 PM' timestamp='1264725052' post='2046759'] That would be like replacing the Prince of Wales with a robot. [/quote] The Prince of Wales [i]is [/i]a robot.
add Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 [quote name='Winchester' date='29 January 2010 - 10:58 AM' timestamp='1264777088' post='2047235'] The Prince of Wales [i]is [/i]a robot. [/quote] so is Tim Tebow
add Posted February 2, 2010 Posted February 2, 2010 CBS has come under fire in recent weeks from nasty little heartless evil hate groups for allowing a conservative Christian group to air an anti-abortion ad NBC eventually sold out all the spots for a record $206 million. Not everything has been smooth for CBS. U.S. women's groups urged the network not to air an ad by Focus on the Family,claiming it has a strident anti-abortion rights message. CBS has approved the ad.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now