reyb Posted March 11, 2010 Author Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='11 March 2010 - 06:16 PM' timestamp='1268349388' post='2071318'] Ah, I'm glad that there actually are other people willing to make the connection there. Sometimes I worry that it's just too obvious. [/quote] Joseph Smith believe in Triune God. While I am not. We are not the same. On the other hand, both of you are believer of this Trinity.
HisChildForever Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='reyb' date='11 March 2010 - 06:22 PM' timestamp='1268349773' post='2071331'] I know it is foolishness in your eyes because as I have said 'You do not know Him'. What you know is your historical Jesus. While I can see both of them. [/quote] Two Jesus'??
Nihil Obstat Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='reyb' date='11 March 2010 - 05:31 PM' timestamp='1268350292' post='2071344'] Joseph Smith believe in Triune God. While I am not. We are not the same. On the other hand, both of you are believer of this Trinity. [/quote] [img]http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2008/12/18/633651790235245434-grammarfail.jpg[/img]
Apotheoun Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='reyb' date='11 March 2010 - 04:31 PM' timestamp='1268350292' post='2071344'] Joseph Smith believe in Triune God. [/quote] Joseph Smith rejected the doctrine of the Trinity. Joseph Smith was a polytheist.
Winchester Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='reyb' date='11 March 2010 - 06:22 PM' timestamp='1268349773' post='2071331'] I know it is foolishness in your eyes because as I have said 'You do not know Him'. What you know is your historical Jesus. While I can see both of them. [/quote] Not foolish: [i]crazy[/i]. I reckon if God has anything to do with this drivel you post, it's connected to the redemptiveness of suffering.
reyb Posted March 11, 2010 Author Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='HisChildForever' date='11 March 2010 - 06:32 PM' timestamp='1268350328' post='2071345'] Two Jesus'?? [/quote] I thought you already heard it from me.
Saint Therese Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='Apotheoun' date='11 March 2010 - 06:32 PM' timestamp='1268350373' post='2071347'] Joseph Smith rejected the doctrine of the Trinity. Joseph Smith was a polytheist. [/quote] Indeed, as are all Mormons.
reyb Posted March 11, 2010 Author Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='11 March 2010 - 06:32 PM' timestamp='1268350354' post='2071346'] [img]http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2008/12/18/633651790235245434-grammarfail.jpg[/img] [/quote] Good be my teacher at least in English.
Nihil Obstat Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='reyb' date='11 March 2010 - 05:42 PM' timestamp='1268350937' post='2071359'] Good be my teacher at least in English. [/quote] Sure. First, that should be two sentences. "Teacher" should be followed with a comma.
HisChildForever Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='reyb' date='11 March 2010 - 06:40 PM' timestamp='1268350809' post='2071356'] I thought you already heard it from me. [/quote] Sometimes I see two people when I should only see one if I'm not wearing my contacts.
Apotheoun Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='11 March 2010 - 04:43 PM' timestamp='1268351011' post='2071362'] . . . "Teacher" should be followed with a comma. [/quote] Yes, Reyb needs to use a comma in that sentence, but sadly the proper use of a comma will not help him get out of his theological coma. Edited March 11, 2010 by Apotheoun
HisChildForever Posted March 11, 2010 Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='Apotheoun' date='11 March 2010 - 06:52 PM' timestamp='1268351526' post='2071366'] Yes, Reyb needs to use a comma in that sentence, but sadly the proper use of a comma will not help him get out of his theological coma. [/quote] Bwuahahahaha.
Marie-Therese Posted March 12, 2010 Posted March 12, 2010 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='11 March 2010 - 06:00 PM' timestamp='1268348445' post='2071289'] If you meant "et tu?", I answered already, silly lady. [/quote] I was being polite in asking, and using the formal instead of the informal so that you did not think I was being fresh. [quote name='Winchester' date='11 March 2010 - 06:11 PM' timestamp='1268349084' post='2071308'] [img]http://jaypgreene.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/crazy_harry.jpg[/img] Your private revelation means absolutely nothing to me. I just noticed, but that weapons grade confusion was [i]after[/i] editing. [/quote] Fan club president, reporting for duty, sir!
Nihil Obstat Posted March 12, 2010 Posted March 12, 2010 [quote name='Marie-Therese' date='11 March 2010 - 06:20 PM' timestamp='1268353210' post='2071375'] I was being polite in asking, and using the formal instead of the informal so that you did not think I was being fresh. [/quote] [img]http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff127/tetrabinary/Two/Replies/oh_u.jpg[/img]
reyb Posted March 12, 2010 Author Posted March 12, 2010 After you see my poor English (and it is good at least I have the opportunity to correct my English and you are all my teachers) now teach me about our subject verse. Okay I will post again. 1 Tim 2:11-15 11 A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. 12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner. 15 [b]But women will be saved through childbearing — if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety. [/b] (Sorry but I have to use NIV – I do not have bible version used by Catholic in an electronic format in my computer ). Question: Is 1 Tim 2:15 a definite statement? What do you think?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now