Tongue, Feet

[dairygirl4u2c]

ty

Edited August 7, 2010 by dairygirl4u2c

[Socrates]

Lame.



And gay.

[HisChildForever]

[quote name='Socrates' date='07 August 2010 - 04:18 PM' timestamp='1281212331' post='2153705']
Lame.



And gay.
[/quote]

As well as unhygienic. If one cleans dirty objects with their tongue, that is.

[MissScripture]

[quote name='HisChildForever' date='07 August 2010 - 04:27 PM' timestamp='1281212873' post='2153708']
As well as unhygienic. If one cleans dirty objects with their tongue, that is.
[/quote]
Can it really even be considered cleaning? I mean, you might wipe dirt off, but you're just smearing more bacteria on...

[Hilde]

1.Detergents.
2.Do I look like a monkey to you?
3.Weird is how i would caracterize them.

[HisChildForever]

[quote name='MissScripture' date='07 August 2010 - 04:34 PM' timestamp='1281213240' post='2153709']
Can it really even be considered cleaning? I mean, you might wipe dirt off, but you're just smearing more bacteria on...
[/quote]

You brush your tongue first, obviously. Get with the program!

[Socrates]

[quote name='HisChildForever' date='07 August 2010 - 04:27 PM' timestamp='1281212873' post='2153708']
As well as unhygienic. If one cleans dirty objects with their tongue, that is.
[/quote]
I was referring to the poll, but yeah, that too.

[Sojourner]

I'm guessing this is meant to address natural law arguments concerning homosexuality or contraception.

DG, I'd recommend you read a book by Germain Grisez called "Contraception and the Natural Law," published in 1964. It addresses just this sort of question. You can buy it from Amazon sellers for about $40, or you might be able to find it at a library. I'd recommend a theological library.

[MissScripture]

[quote name='HisChildForever' date='07 August 2010 - 04:38 PM' timestamp='1281213482' post='2153713']
You brush your tongue first, obviously. Get with the program!
[/quote]
Yeah, but that can't possibly get all the bacteria off. *shudders* Although, I suppose if you used something with alcohol in it, you could kill most organisms. Regardless, I am grossed out just thinking about touching a table someone licked off and didn't then wash with, at the very least, soap and water! *insert pukey smiley here*

[Jaime]

DG you have officially run out of polls.

[Moosey]

I hate when my mouth has been closed for a while (go ahead and make your jokes) and I open it up and I get a whiff of my breath

[KnightofChrist]

[quote name='Moosey' date='07 August 2010 - 07:42 PM' timestamp='1281224526' post='2153753']
I hate when my mouth has been [b]closed[/b] for a while (go ahead and make your jokes) and I open it up and I get a whiff of my breath
[/quote]



Love you! Mean it!

[KnightofChrist]

Is it a sin to clean a power outlet with ones tongue?

[Hilde]

[quote name='KnightofChrist' date='08 August 2010 - 03:33 AM' timestamp='1281227639' post='2153782']
Is it a sin to clean a power outlet with ones tongue?
[/quote]
Are you invincibly ignorant, and do not know this is suicide?

[KnightofChrist]

[quote name='Hilde' date='07 August 2010 - 10:04 PM' timestamp='1281233049' post='2153851']
Are you invincibly ignorant, and do not know this is suicide?
[/quote]

ZING!

[Hilde]

wut

[Sternhauser]

Yes, if this is intended to address the question of natural law and sodomy, I think it's important to nip it right in the bud:

1. As Miss Scripture points out, licking something, by its very nature, is incapable of cleaning anything. Unless residual filthy saliva from the act of licking dead flies off a doorhandle could be considered an improvement over the dead flies. I don't think it's rational to prefer filthy saliva over dead flies. Lysol wipes, [i]by their nature[/i], are ordered toward cleaning. The tongue is [i]not [/i]ordered toward cleaning.

2. Picking up something with one's feet is not intrinsically evil. Appendages exist to serve the true good of the whole body. An absence of hands, or refusing, for a disordered reason, to use one's hands for their proper purpose, would be a natural or a moral evil, respectively.

~Sternhauser

Edited August 8, 2010 by Sternhauser

[Hilde]

[quote name='Sternhauser' date='08 August 2010 - 08:19 AM' timestamp='1281244784' post='2153942']
Yes, if this is intended to address the question of natural law and sodomy, I think it's important to nip it right in the bud:

1. As Miss Scripture points out, licking something, by its very nature, is incapable of cleaning anything. Unless residual filthy saliva from the act of licking dead flies off a doorhandle could be considered an improvement over the dead flies. I don't think it's rational to prefer filthy saliva over dead flies. Lysol wipes, [i]by their nature[/i], are ordered toward cleaning. The tongue is [i]not [/i]ordered toward cleaning.

2. Picking up something with one's feet is not intrinsically evil. Appendages exist to serve the true good of the whole body. An absence of hands, or refusing, for a disordered reason, to use one's hands for their proper purpose, would be a natural or a moral evil, respectively.

~Sternhauser
[/quote]
What about walking on one's hands?

Edited August 8, 2010 by Hilde

[Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam]

[quote name='Hilde' date='08 August 2010 - 02:25 AM' timestamp='1281245105' post='2153943']
What about walking on one's hands?
[/quote]

I think we call that fun or what Sternhauser would in his own serious way refer to as the fact that "appendages exist to serve the true good of the whole body." Obviously, having fun is good for the body.

Edited August 8, 2010 by Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam

[Sternhauser]

[quote name='Hilde' date='08 August 2010 - 12:25 AM' timestamp='1281245105' post='2153943']
What about walking on one's hands?
[/quote]

Like he said. Walking on one's hands for fun is not necessarily disordered, and does serve the good of the body.

~Sternhauser

Edited August 8, 2010 by Sternhauser