The Greatest Scientist Wrote The Bible

[Mr.Cat]

[quote name='KnightofChrist' timestamp='1288309449' post='2183313']There is no need for insulting someone whom has also studied the subject and arrived at a different conclusion that you have sir. This does not change the fact that marco-evolution has not truly been observed. It makes an assumition, that because mirco-evolution is true then marco-evolution must be true.[/quote]No you haven't, what your experiencing is called [i][b]DENIAL[/b][/i]. This argument is just a repeat of denial. Nothing insulting said before. But I notice that recently when you cant argue against something you just cry "personal attack" or "insulting". [quote name='KnightofChrist' timestamp='1288309449' post='2183313']Much of what is in the realm of marco-evolution theory is theory and conjecture. Electromagnetism can be observed, marco-evolution, if true, cannot be observed, as it takes millions of years to happen, again if true.[/quote]So wait, you admit it is a Scientific THEORY, but you are willing to call it speculative or conjecture? Then you deny the entire fossil record?

Wow...[quote name='KnightofChrist' timestamp='1288309449' post='2183313']Again no need to insult, the fact remains the above statement is not an observation of human evolution. No one observed human evolution, observation of the fossil record is not the same as observation of human evolution. Based on the fossil record science estimates, conceptualizes and theorizes how humans may have evolved. Human evolution is a scientific theory based on evidence but not on observation. [/quote]No insult again... But cool.

In science I hope you are aware that just because you cant mix something together in a test tube and see bubbles, it is still science. If Person A brutally murdered someone and they had the forensic science to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that Person A brutally murdered someone, you would argue that because these scientists weren't here, its all speculation! Unless it's not a qualification to actually be there...[quote name='KnightofChrist' timestamp='1288309449' post='2183313']Dogs and Wolfs still belong to the same species Canis Lupus. There are different sub-species of Canis Lupus but dogs are not another species.[/quote]When you look at scientific classifications like, "[b][i]Canis familiaris domesticus[/i][/b]", "[i]canis lupus dingo[/i]", and "[i]canis lupus arabs[/i]" do you just conclude THEIR ALL THE SAME! So you would take a dog, a dingo, and a wolf and call them all the same...? WOW, someone needs to go back to pre-school to learn to differentiate between different animals. Just because "sub-species" is the only thing changing on that scientific classification it doesn't make it "[i]close enough[/i]"...

[quote name='KnightofChrist' timestamp='1288309449' post='2183313']Then Dr. Breden, I and others are daft in your eyes. Endlers ([i]Poecilia wingei)[/i] can and do breed with Guppies ([i]Poecilia reticulata), [/i]and the offspring is fertile. In every case of inter species breeding I have heard of the offspring is infertile. It is in fact hotly contested by scientists based on genetics of the two fish that each belongs to different species. Genetic evidence shows they are the same species.[/quote]Yes, because there isn't heated debate, it IS accepted as another species and is treated as another species. IF you went to a store and pointed at the tank and said "[i]I want these guppies[/i]" a clerk would tell you, "[i]Oh! But these aren't our guppies, this way sir![/i]" Which, when I was in class, the genetics were tested which shows conclusively there was a change. Because when these two species of guppies are put into tanks, THEY DON'T breed. [i]Shocker[/i]? Unless you have evidence to support these nonsensical claims I am going to stick to what I was taught by people who are qualified to teach.

Because I am sure you are aware Doctor John Endler was repeatedly hailed and awarded for his findings in this particular matter. He was made a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and again late as 2008 by the European Research Council. That more importantly he was a great figure in the fields of ethology and evolutionary biology...

If by Dr. Brenden http://www.sfu.ca/biology/faculty/breden/lab/index.htm this website I found from Google, thank you for providing such sketchy information about him. There is no indication that hes ever even seen these guppies Endlar worked with nonetheless done research with them... So YES, if you don't see the very apparent changes I would have to conclude your acting daft unless you can present something more tangible to discussion.

[b]Note[/b]: "[i]There is observation and theory[/i]" you quoted me saying, I didn't say. My only guess is in your rush to distract the topic more, to deny more, and to insist I am insulting you more that you didn't finish writing this part of your reply... In the future, please be more tidy.