Michael Jackson Was Prolife; Link/lyrics To His Song (abortion Papers)

[4588686]

[quote name='FuturePriest387' timestamp='1348206550' post='2484970']
Every person, no matter what they did, had some good in them.
[/quote]

Obviously you've never been to Florida

[PhuturePriest]

[quote name='Hasan' timestamp='1348206880' post='2484973']
Obviously you've never been to Florida
[/quote]

Or your house.

[4588686]

Poo. You quoted it before I could change the state to South Carolina.

Edited September 21, 2012 by Hasan

[Selah]

Has anyone here ever had a veggie hoagie?

I like veggie hoagies.

[Vincent Vega]

[quote name='Hasan' timestamp='1348206880' post='2484973']
Obviously you've never been to Florida
[/quote]
You're a prostitute.

Edited September 21, 2012 by USAirwaysIHS

[Selah]

[quote name='USAirwaysIHS' timestamp='1348231940' post='2485006']
You're a prostitute.
[/quote]

But a [i]pro life[/i] prostitute.

[Winchester]

[img]http://garagehammer.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Sponsor-page-game-preserve-2.jpg[/img]

[Admin]

edit

Edited September 21, 2012 by Admin

[ElenaOO]

Those who call Michael Jackson a ped***le here should be ashamed for being so superficial in their judgments. I've been doing research of the allegations for three years now and can testify before God that there was not a single reason for calling him that way.

The second (Arvizos') case was a pure joke as they claimed that the boy was molested [i]after [/i]the whole world started looking at Neverland in horror (after Martin Bashir's documentary shown on TV). Following the logic of the prosecutors first he was suspected of a crime and then he decided to help the prosecution by actually committing it. Never heard of a bigger absurdity.

So it is only the first (the Chandlers') case which is more or less worth talking about. Very few people know that back in 1993 it was [i]Michael Jackson[/i] and his lawyer Bert Fields who insisted on criminal proceedings as Michael was eager to prove his innocence in court. However his accusers filed a civil suit (where no one goes to prison [i]in principle[/i], civil suits are all about money) and to Michael's misfortune the judge ruled that the civil case should [i]go first[/i], prior to the criminal case.

A civil case could last for years effectively depriving Michael Jackson of the chance to earn money. Considering that he was in the middle of the Dangerous tour (he had to pay $20mln. in damages to the tour promoter for its disruption) and that his expenses on lawyers were reported in the press to be $100,000 per week, this alone could ruin him altogether.

Hence the choice to settle (later the sum was covered by the insurance company) and go on with the criminal proceedings. The criminal case went further and lasted for another 8 months. However even after listening to 400 witnesses and [i]two[/i] Grand Juries looking into the case there was nothing found to indict Michael for.

No criminal charges were ever brought against him though he was investigated by [i]two[/i] District Attorneys (of the L.A. and Santa Barbara counties), [i]two [/i]Sheriff's departments, the Department of Family and Children Services and the FBI (who followed him for some 15 years). None of them found anything at all - Michael was clean.

The money settlement did not preclude the family from cooperating with the authorities. However they chose not to and even during the 2005 trial none of them took the opportunity to punish 'the predator". Ray Chandler, the uncle of the accuser who wrote a "tell-all" book about him was actually subpoenaed by Michael Jackson's [i]defense team[/i] to prove his case in court, but he fought it tooth and nail and hid under the Shield law protecting publishers.

Ray Chandler actually said it himself that if Michael had paid the family [i]at once[/i] he would have gone into history as the most famous performer instead of the most famous molester.

Indeed if Michael Jackson had wanted to "silence" them he would have done it at the very beginning of the case, and not half a year later when he was totally exhausted by the media nastiness and the financial burden of legal costs.

The crucial point of the whole thing is that the photos of Michael's genitalia made by the police did not match the arbitrary description made by his accuser.

The "real thing" was totally different from what he described and this is all we need to know - MJ was not circumcised (though the boy said he was) and the genitalia were not dark (though the boy thought they were as he spoke of some light splotches the "color of his face" there - by then MJ had already publicly disclosed the truth about his vitiligo). Well, even simple logic tells you that if the photos had matched, MJ would have been arrested then and there, but he wasn't.

In short the boy was telling lies about Michael Jackson.

It was a huge frame-up.

[Selah]

Oh boy, here we go.