Jump to content
Join our Facebook Group ×
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Recommended Posts

Posted

[quote name='vee8' timestamp='1352851297' post='2509503']
what good has Puerto Rico done for anyone anyway???
[/quote]


they provided Hawaii with a new highly vocal invasive species of frog.

Posted

[quote name='vee8' timestamp='1352856986' post='2509551']
oh. well thats more than canada has done for anyone so viva PR!!
[/quote]

Vidal Icewine is from Canada. :)

Posted

[quote name='Maximilianus' timestamp='1352850776' post='2509494']

hard to claim that when they are Citizens of the United States and part of the insular territory.
[/quote]
Legally, of course, it's not a country. But I've never met a Puerto Rican who would consider being Puerto Rican a subset of being American, like being a "New Yorker" or a "Texan."

Posted

[quote name='Era Might' timestamp='1352933761' post='2510070']
Legally, of course, it's not a country. But I've never met a Puerto Rican who would consider being Puerto Rican a subset of being American, like being a "New Yorker" or a "Texan."
[/quote]
Was that not the whole point of the United [i]States[/i]? :hehe:

Posted (edited)

[quote name='Nihil Obstat' timestamp='1352933823' post='2510071']
Was that not the whole point of the United [i]States[/i]? :hehe:
[/quote]
Much of the Lincoln-Douglas debates is devoted to whether America was ever meant for non-Whites. Even Lincoln, while arguing for the human dignity of non-Whites, was very clear that Whites were socially superior and must always remain so. As Douglas phrased it, "this government was made on the white basis."

The original expansion of America was for the expansion of the White man, not the incorporation of non-White peoples into States. Of course, that is not relevant to the Puerto Rican question today, but it relates to the question you're asking about what "United States" originally meant.

Edited by Era Might
Posted

[quote name='Era Might' timestamp='1352934243' post='2510072']
Much of the Lincoln-Douglas debates is devoted to whether America was ever meant for non-Whites. Even Lincoln, while arguing for the human dignity of non-Whites, was very clear that Whites were socially superior and must always remain so. As Douglas phrased it, "this government was made on the white basis."

The original expanasion of America was for the expansion of the White man, not the incorporation of non-White peoples into States. Of course, that is not relevant to the Puerto Rican question today, but it relates to the question you're asking about what "United States" originally meant.
[/quote]
You always have to make it about racism. :sad2:

Posted (edited)

[quote name='Nihil Obstat' timestamp='1352934314' post='2510073']
You always have to make it about racism. :sad2:
[/quote]
lol I only brought that up because you brought up the historical meaning of the "United States." There was always the overarching question of national identity. Back then it was racial. Today it is not racial, but there is a national identity that has been forged and America has evolved from a simplistic collection of separate countries, so it's a strange to "graft" Puerto Rico onto America IMO. You're Canadian anyway.

Edited by Era Might
Posted (edited)

[quote name='Era Might' timestamp='1352934518' post='2510075']
lol I only brought that up because you brought up the historical meaning of the "United States." There was always the overarching question of national identity. Back then it was racial. Today it is not racial, but there is a national identity that has been forged and American has evolved from a simplistic collection of separate countries. You're Canadian anyway.
[/quote]
I am Albertan first! :|

[img]http://www.viewcalgary.com/peter/stampede/bullRiding/images/DSC_4320.jpg[/img]

Not really though. Canada has never had the same kind of provincial identity that is analogous to the states. At least not since the very earliest Dominion times.

Edit: Except for Quebec.

Edited by Nihil Obstat
Posted

We've got Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln. You've got Dan Akroyd and Jim Carrey.

Posted

[quote name='Era Might' timestamp='1352935126' post='2510080']
We've got Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln. You've got Dan Akroyd and Jim Carrey.
[/quote]
Hey, we have [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_riel"]Louis Riel[/url]. You would love that guy.

[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Louis_Riel.jpg/240px-Louis_Riel.jpg[/img]

Posted

California needs to be split in 2 (North California, South California). Keep it all even. 52 states, still short of the 57 states Obama thinks he has visited...

dominicansoul
Posted

[quote name='Era Might' timestamp='1352935126' post='2510080']
We've got Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln. You've got Dan Akroyd and Jim Carrey.
[/quote]

Don't forget, they've got Justin Bieber, too...

Posted (edited)

[quote name='Maximilianus' timestamp='1352857914' post='2509557']
they provided Hawaii with a new highly vocal invasive species of frog.
[/quote]


Whaaaat? I didn't know that the Coqui was now in Hawaii. [s]Does it sing (make noise) there?[/s]

Edit: just read online about Hawaii and the coqui. Wow.

Edited by cmariadiaz
dominicansoul
Posted

I wanted to bring a Coqui home with me, but I couldn't risk going through customs and them finding one on me :lol:

Posted

[quote name='dominicansoul' timestamp='1353010997' post='2510719']
I wanted to bring a Coqui home with me, but I couldn't risk going through customs and them finding one on me :lol:
[/quote]
Given Australia's experience, perhaps that is for the best.

homeschoolmom
Posted

[quote name='Nihil Obstat' timestamp='1352935242' post='2510082']
Hey, we have [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_riel"]Louis Riel[/url]. You would love that guy.

[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Louis_Riel.jpg/240px-Louis_Riel.jpg[/img]
[/quote]

He looks like Edgar Allen Poe. :|

Posted

[quote name='homeschoolmom' timestamp='1353023708' post='2510871']


He looks like Edgar Allen Poe. :|
[/quote]
Great minds look alike?

brianthephysicist
Posted

So has anyone figured out where the proposed 6 members of the house would come from?

I'm going under the impression that we're no longer going to add any to the house, just reshuffle every ten years (when the census data is taken). Which states would lose representatives?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...