Autumn Dusk Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 I can agree with most of that. Go back and reread your first post on this thread and Beatitude's. How should I have read them? And at Apo, I'm not in a state of uncharitable feeling. I'd still buy everyone a beer and let them into my front door. I'm still lost Evangetholic. We were pointing out that St Paul was acting within the bounds of his time. We haven't said anything that could be construde as saying that he was some kind of evil machagonist, no attack his character. At this point, I'm out of the debate. I feel like I'm talking to my friend's 6yo when she's having a tantrum. Everything keeps getting taken out of context and put through a filter of how bad I must think St. Paul was to act the way he did.
Selah Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 :D I'll be your Voris if you need me to be. Just a little ball of anger and bad hair. I'm honestly looking for floops to give. I'm just not finding them. St Paul wasn't spouting any twenty-first century "isms." Add's been an unprovoked jerk to me. The Bible's inerrant. Catholicism is true. And Butthurt, even from the fairer sex, will not make scripture a collection of first century ramblings and St Paul some woman-hating cretin. D'awwwwww
Evangetholic Posted March 6, 2013 Author Posted March 6, 2013 "Aren't there also bible verses about women of worth and how a woman goes to the market, yadda, yadda. That said, God also built his church on St. Peter, not St. Paul, so Paul's commands to his church may literally have been just that." Before 1970 or so anyone speaking like this and refusing to relent would've been excommunicated--at best.
HisChildForever Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 Well--for me Christ's Vicar on this earth is the Pope. Unto him it is necessary unto salvation for every human creature (with the reason and faith to do so) to be subject. The Catholic Church in the East holds a different view - and it still entirely Catholic.
HisChildForever Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 "Aren't there also bible verses about women of worth and how a woman goes to the market, yadda, yadda. That said, God also built his church on St. Peter, not St. Paul, so Paul's commands to his church may literally have been just that." Before 1970 or so anyone speaking like this and refusing to relent would've been excommunicated--at best. And what would be the "at worst" - burned at the stake?
Socrates Posted March 6, 2013 Posted March 6, 2013 "Sexism" is a politically-correct modern "sin" invented in the late 20th century, used to dismiss or demonize any dissent from current pc feminist ideology (similar to "homophobia," "Islamophobia," and other such nonsense), and thus charges of "sexism" are largely meaningless, and best ignored.
4588686 Posted March 7, 2013 Posted March 7, 2013 "Sexism" is a politically-correct modern "sin" invented in the late 20th century, used to dismiss or demonize any dissent from current pc feminist ideology (similar to "homophobia," "Islamophobia," and other such nonsense), and thus charges of "sexism" are largely meaningless, and best ignored. You're a peach.
Evangetholic Posted March 7, 2013 Author Posted March 7, 2013 For what its worth I believe in all of those "phobias" and have consistently objected to them on this phorum and in life. I'm just prepared to accuse the Sacred Texts or an Apostle chosen by Jesus Christ of them.
Evangetholic Posted March 7, 2013 Author Posted March 7, 2013 For what its worth I believe in all of those "phobias" and have consistently objected to them on this phorum and in life. I'm just not prepared to accuse the Sacred Texts or an Apostle chosen by Jesus Christ of them.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now