T-fish Posted May 11, 2013 Author Posted May 11, 2013 It's not really fun catching fish in a barrel either. Jesus has a lot of throw backs these days.
jeffboom Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 (edited) It's not really fun catching fish in a barrel either. Jesus has a lot of throw backs these days. anti-props -(1/props) Edited May 11, 2013 by jeffboom
CatholicsAreKewl Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 anti-props -(1/props) At this rate, he's going to become the Anti-Christ of props.
T-fish Posted May 11, 2013 Author Posted May 11, 2013 Y'all are straw. Straw burns easy just like hypocrites
jeffboom Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 (edited) Y'all are straw. Straw burns easy just like hypocrites I've never tried to light a hypocrite on fire. Or a fish. Edited May 11, 2013 by jeffboom
T-fish Posted May 11, 2013 Author Posted May 11, 2013 Then you have not descended to the dead. Be glad that God is merciful and just to give you another day and your daily bread.
jeffboom Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 Then you have not descended to the dead. Be glad that God is merciful and just to give you another day and your daily bread. I can't say that I have. On the other hand I went shotgun fishing the other day. It was pretty phishy.
PhuturePriest Posted May 12, 2013 Posted May 12, 2013 Right . . . but that doesn't mean this study automatically renders previous studies invalid. Science is always in flux, and scientists rarely speak in terms of certainty ESPECIALLY concerning relatively new medical practices. To say there is "no scientific evidence" is clearly false. Exactly. Scientists still consider gravity as a theory and not a fact. They obviously take a while to be conclusive on things, so give them time to figure out the specifics of plan B and assume that it is abortifacient, because even if it's not, it's still birth-control, and it's still wrong.
Nihil Obstat Posted May 12, 2013 Posted May 12, 2013 Exactly. Scientists still consider gravity as a theory and not a fact. They obviously take a while to be conclusive on things, so give them time to figure out the specifics of plan B and assume that it is abortifacient, because even if it's not, it's still birth-control, and it's still wrong. That is not what theory means when scientists use the word.
Ice_nine Posted May 12, 2013 Posted May 12, 2013 Nor what I meant. And FP, contraception for sexual assault victims (which is one of the pill's uses) would not be wrong, jsyk.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now