Luigi Posted April 24 Posted April 24 Lame. And ineffective. If your intention is to wrangle us into clicking on your links, you're not doing your job very well.
Anastasia13 Posted May 2 Author Posted May 2 On 4/24/2026 at 1:16 PM, Luigi said: Lame. And ineffective. If your intention is to wrangle us into clicking on your links, you're not doing your job very well. It’s not my video. It is an interesting discussion point, imo. Thoughts on the interpretation or on the differences in focus of the story?
Luigi Posted May 2 Posted May 2 I know it's not your video. I was addressing SenatorArmstrong, who hides his hyperlinks in the quoted part of the post, and then writes - or generates? - something like relevant comments about the quotation. He's not as bad as a lot of the other recent scammers, but he is just another scammer, and I wish he'd leave us alone.
dUSt Posted May 11 Posted May 11 On 4/22/2026 at 12:33 PM, Anastasia13 said: Thoughts? Yeah, I'm not watching 8 minutes of AI reading a script. Can you summarize?
veritasluxmea Posted July 27 Posted July 27 On 5/11/2026 at 3:31 PM, dUSt said: Yeah, I'm not watching 8 minutes of AI reading a script. Can you summarize? ask AI to summarize
CountrySteve937 Posted July 27 Posted July 27 On 4/22/2026 at 1:33 PM, Anastasia13 said: Thoughts? The problem with Catholics (online) who toss around terms like "modernism" is that, in my experience, they can't even define what modernism is 😅 They use it as a "scary" word to condemn whatever liturgical practices or papal statements (post VII) they don't like. It's an amorphous term that can mean whatever they want it to mean. Similar to how some Democrats call everyone they don't like "fascists" Both groups of people use these terms ahistorically
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now