IcePrincessKRS Posted August 8, 2004 Posted August 8, 2004 Isn't calling us all Imperialistic Americans somehow against phorum guidelines? I'm getting tired of all these ridiculous posts.... dude, you're not American, you can't vote here, give it a rest! Please! :haha:
Ash Wednesday Posted August 8, 2004 Posted August 8, 2004 [quote name='IcePrincessKRS' date='Aug 8 2004, 02:33 PM'] :haha: [/quote] :haha:
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 [quote name='IcePrincessKRS' date='Aug 9 2004, 06:03 AM'] Isn't calling us all Imperialistic Americans somehow against phorum guidelines? I'm getting tired of all these ridiculous posts.... dude, you're not American, you can't vote here, give it a rest! Please! :haha: [/quote] Did I Call [b]AMERICANS[/b] Imperialistics, or the [b]US ADMIN[/b]? Plz Read Closer.
Matty_boy Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 I did some research on "The World According to Bush" and William Korel, the director of the film. The movie was released in France by the Swiss director and was held in reserve for the Cannes Film Festival in case Fahrenheit 9/11 wasn't finished in time. Another movie made by Mr. Korel is "The Dark Side of the Moon" which is a "documentary" supporting the idea that landing on the moon was faked by NASA. I don't think Mr. Korels ideas can be cited as a credible source. [url="http://www.orwelltoday.com/moonhoaxdoc.shtml"]Dark Side of the Moon[/url] I agree that the prisoner abuse scandal should never have happened. Bush had nothing to do with it. As far as jobs are concerned, Meet the Press had Mary Matalin on March 4th. [url="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4456277/"]transcript[/url] She said that 75% of the jobs lost were lost in 2001 and that 40% of those jobs were lost within 90 days after 9/11 (not the movie). Do you remember how bad the economy was after the World Trade Center was destroyed? Even before that, the economy was already heading downhill while President Clinton was in office. If you read carefully, the definition I got from www.dictionary.com encompasses unlawful warfare. It doesn't say it word for word, but in many words with the same effect. I don't understand how being a zionist is anti-gentile. The Muslims are the ones who killed the Jews and Christians living in Jerusalem in the 7th century, and the Muslims are the ones killing Jews and Christians today. I've never heard of any Jews killing any Christians or hurting any Christians. The British mandate, also strongly supported by President Truman, was not a form of terrorism. The Jews in Israel are not suicide bombing crowded buses or restaurants, like the Islamic Palestinians do. You need to cite some sources on some of your comments. Also, you're not an expert on American politics, logic, or reason. Living in a particular country is way different than reading about it in National Geographic or watching Michael Moore movies. You also still haven't said how President Bush has acted immorally. How has America's foreign policy done more damage than terrorism? Give some support to your arguments. Finally, the United States was formed by a bunch of settlers from many different countries that came to the New World to start a new life away from the tyranny of monarchys. They weren't part of a conquering force from another country with the intent of exploiting the land to make things better back home. They didn't start pushing the indians west until after the U.S. government was formed. Many European countries have occupied parts of the world for years for all kinds of exploitation. America has occupied other countries solely for noble causes (Germany in WWII, Iraq now, etc).
homeschoolmom Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 [quote name='Raphael' date='Aug 7 2004, 03:02 PM'] Now, now, Adam, there is no need for that. It's spelled "a**es." [/quote] :crackup:
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 [quote name='Matty_boy' date='Aug 9 2004, 02:31 PM'] stuff [/quote] Im fuzzy on the land mooning myself, there seems to be a few problems with it. But I dont really care for that since it doesnt endanger my countries security. [quote]If you read carefully, the definition I got from www.dictionary.com encompasses unlawful warfare. It doesn't say it word for word, but in many words with the same effect.[/quote] Its more of an outsiders term. Like the word cool, means something good, or great, not just about tempature. [quote]I don't understand how being a zionist is anti-gentile. The Muslims are the ones who killed the Jews and Christians living in Jerusalem in the 7th century, and the Muslims are the ones killing Jews and Christians today. I've never heard of any Jews killing any Christians or hurting any Christians. [/quote] Well it depends on which type of Zionist you are. Bush belongs to a Christian Fundamentalist One. They act like Jews, Israeli flags and all, but only for the sole purpose of getting the third temple rebuild, so Christ will return. Im sure youve heard of that. The two most racist and anti-gentile zionist groups as the Biblical Zionists, and the Political Zionists. The Political Zionists want Israeli politics and the country free from gentile intrusion [US/ Britain], and the Biblical Zionists want to go back to the Golden Age of Judaism. King David etc. Where gentiles are seen as sub-humans, I believe the Talmud sheds some light on this. Also there are 4 saints, babies that were cruxified by Jews in the middle ages. Ill try and find the article. [quote]The British mandate, also strongly supported by President Truman, was not a form of terrorism. The Jews in Israel are not suicide bombing crowded buses or restaurants, like the Islamic Palestinians do.[/quote] The British shot dead jews jumping off the ships to get to 'their' homeland. What i said was, the first form of modern terrorism was done by Jews. [quote]You need to cite some sources on some of your comments. Also, you're not an expert on American politics, logic, or reason. Living in a particular country is way different than reading about it in National Geographic or watching Michael Moore movies. You also still haven't said how President Bush has acted immorally. How has America's foreign policy done more damage than terrorism? Give some support to your arguments.[/quote] [quote]You also still haven't said how President Bush has acted immorally.[/quote] Iraq. Thats a big enough example. [quote] How has America's foreign policy done more damage than terrorism?[/quote] Ill get some stuff soon. [quote]Finally, the United States was formed by a bunch of settlers from many different countries that came to the New World to start a new life away from the tyranny of monarchys. They weren't part of a conquering force from another country with the intent of exploiting the land to make things better back home. They didn't start pushing the indians west until after the U.S. government was formed. Many European countries have occupied parts of the world for years for all kinds of exploitation. America has occupied other countries solely for noble causes (Germany in WWII, Iraq now, etc).[/quote] [quote]Finally, the United States was formed by a bunch of settlers from many different countries that came to the New World to start a new life away from the tyranny of monarchys. [/quote] And ending up terrorizing the Indians. Ironic huh? [quote]America has occupied other countries solely for noble causes (Germany in WWII, Iraq now, etc).[/quote] America takes over a country a different way, implanting their choice of leader who will help them, for instance Al Chalab, in iraq. The US Admin. Always does what it likes for itself.
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 And Please dont start saying Im anti-semitic because of that terrorism comment. Im so sick of hearing that.
franciscanheart Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 I dont know about the whole trial thing but if he's admitting to these things then why is he using that as his big campaign tool? am i the only one that thinks that is absolutely absurd???
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 I think hes got nothing to hide, but maybe others have taken it out of context, who knows, its not a smart plan, and thats what makes me dodgy bout it
IcePrincessKRS Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 [quote name='MorphRC' date='Aug 8 2004, 11:11 PM'] Did I Call [b]AMERICANS[/b] Imperialistics, or the [b]US ADMIN[/b]? Plz Read Closer. [/quote] I was being humorous.
IcePrincessKRS Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 [quote name='MorphRC' date='Aug 8 2004, 03:34 AM'] Typical American Imperialist attitude. And americans wonder why people hate them so much. They hate us because of our freedom and liberty.. ROFL! [/quote] Oh yeah, by the way, on page 1 you said Adam has a "typical American Imperialist attitude." That indicates that all Americans are like that. Re-read your own words.
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 No it dont...lol It implies he that [he seems] to align himself with people that are. Nice Try
IcePrincessKRS Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 Sorry buddy, that does not give we American's the idea that you mean only the US Admin. The term "typical" gives the impression of "imperialist" being the norm.
Brother Adam Posted August 10, 2004 Author Posted August 10, 2004 lol. Name calling gets no one anywhere. John Kerry keeps trying it and he keeps sinking in the polls. For the first time in history Democrates not only did not recieve a 5-7 point boost after the DNC, Bush gained points! You can call me anything you want, it doesn't change the fact that you are wrong
MorphRC Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 [quote name='IcePrincessKRS' date='Aug 10 2004, 04:58 AM'] Sorry buddy, that does not give we American's the idea that you mean only the US Admin. The term "typical" gives the impression of "imperialist" being the norm. [/quote] Not my fault ur society is ultra-conscience about such things.
MorphRC Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 [quote name='Brother Adam' date='Aug 10 2004, 10:49 AM'] lol. Name calling gets no one anywhere. John Kerry keeps trying it and he keeps sinking in the polls. For the first time in history Democrates not only did not recieve a 5-7 point boost after the DNC, Bush gained points! You can call me anything you want, it doesn't change the fact that you are wrong [/quote] It isnt a name like stupid or that, its a political stance. So plz drop the name calling line. Im not explaining myself again. Victimize urself all u like.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now