Good Friday Posted September 23, 2004 Posted September 23, 2004 [quote name='Raphael']Only in the letter of the law. The spirit of the law is against negative criticism. dUSt simply wrote only about negative criticism of other religions because he did not anticipate political discussion. Negative criticism of any kind, I suspect, would be prohibited by dUSt himself.[/quote] "The spirit of the law"? And you [b]suspect[/b] it would be prohibited? Don't you think you should ask before censoring something? It's not like dUSt is totally inaccessible. You might ask him about something instead of taking it upon yourself to revise the rules. Will you take this approach to "negative criticism" when and if the new American administration becomes a Kerry Administration, or will you permit negative criticism then? Obviously, when they're talking about "the spirit of the law" and what dUSt [b]might[/b] do, the moderators are getting out of hand.
littleflower+JMJ Posted September 23, 2004 Posted September 23, 2004 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' date='Sep 23 2004, 05:00 AM'] There is nothing wrong with criticism [positive or negative] if done in a polite manner. Cite your sources and use good manners. Remember, however, this is not a political board, so fixating on government behavior unless it is related to the Church really shouldn't be here. [/quote] she said it best. it really matters not what you say but how you say it. think before posting. have a great day! :tiphat:
MorphRC Posted September 23, 2004 Author Posted September 23, 2004 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' date='Sep 23 2004, 08:30 PM'] There is nothing wrong with criticism [positive or negative] if done in a polite manner. Cite your sources and use good manners. Remember, however, this is not a political board, so fixating on government behavior unless it is related to the Church really shouldn't be here. [/quote] ty. Sorry, but there would be no where else, if I put it in Lame board, he would have closed it or deleted it. Cant put it in the open mic, since its a debate. Its the closest thing I could get.
MorphRC Posted September 23, 2004 Author Posted September 23, 2004 [quote name='Good Friday' date='Sep 23 2004, 10:16 PM'] [quote name='Raphael']Only in the letter of the law. The spirit of the law is against negative criticism. dUSt simply wrote only about negative criticism of other religions because he did not anticipate political discussion. Negative criticism of any kind, I suspect, would be prohibited by dUSt himself.[/quote] "The spirit of the law"? And you [b]suspect[/b] it would be prohibited? Don't you think you should ask before censoring something? It's not like dUSt is totally inaccessible. You might ask him about something instead of taking it upon yourself to revise the rules. [b]Will you take this approach to "negative criticism" when and if the new American administration becomes a Kerry Administration, or will you permit negative criticism then?[/b] Obviously, when they're talking about "the spirit of the law" and what dUSt [b]might[/b] do, the moderators are getting out of hand. [/quote] Bolded Part: Lol Got ya there. There is so much anti-kerry stuff on here I could fill a book. Yet there is no censoring, anti-bush stuff [color=red][EDIT EDIT EDIT][/color].
cmotherofpirl Posted September 23, 2004 Posted September 23, 2004 (edited) If Bush claimed to be catholic and still wanted to slice and dice children, he would get the same treatment :angry: Edited September 23, 2004 by cmotherofpirl
MorphRC Posted September 23, 2004 Author Posted September 23, 2004 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' date='Sep 24 2004, 01:43 AM'] If Bush claimed to be catholic and still wanted to slice and dice children, he would get the same treatment :angry: [/quote] Is that a double standard? See, this is what I have to, and others, have to deal with. You say be kind here to this person, but to hell with this guy.
qfnol31 Posted September 23, 2004 Posted September 23, 2004 I think she's saying that if Bush were pro-abortion and claimed to be Catholic, we would treat him the say way we do with Kerry.
MorphRC Posted September 23, 2004 Author Posted September 23, 2004 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Sep 24 2004, 02:06 AM'] I think she's saying that if Bush were pro-abortion and claimed to be Catholic, we would treat him the say way we do with Kerry. [/quote] uncharitable..yes. I wonder why none of those people have been warned. I might go get some quotes of uncharitable comments. But i doubt anything will be done.
MorphRC Posted September 23, 2004 Author Posted September 23, 2004 [b]Uncharitable Comments and Behaviour:[/b] [url="http://phorum.phatmass.com/index.php?act=Search&CODE=show&searchid=ad70d12b5c742a8026e032101363554f&search_in=titles&result_type=topics&highlite=kerry"]http://phorum.phatmass.com/index.php?act=S...&highlite=kerry[/url] More than a short list.
littleflower+JMJ Posted September 23, 2004 Posted September 23, 2004 okay we decided a [i]long[/i] time ago there wasn't going to be any bashing anymore (bush or kerry). until then respect the moderator's choices...there is no editing or warning unless there is a reason. this is really getting redundant and tiring......so yeah its closed. PM me if you have any questions, but i think everything has been pretty much clear. I apologize if there is a misunderstanding...but thats all folks! God bless, flowery +JMJ+
cmotherofpirl Posted September 23, 2004 Posted September 23, 2004 MorphRC if Bush claimed to be catholic and supported slice and dice, he would not be popular on this board. [i]Any candidate[/i] of [i]any party[/i] who believes in slice and dice will not be popular on this board, simply because we don't believe in murdering our future children.
Recommended Posts