dUSt Posted December 2, 2004 Author Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Dec 1 2004, 07:17 PM'] They were all four the same two people? [/quote] For all I know they were all four the same person. Doesn't really matter anymore anyway.
IcePrincessKRS Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Dec 1 2004, 08:17 PM'] They were all four the same two people? [/quote] There were at least 2 (maybe 3?). Dave met them once. But like dUSt said, it doesn't matter anymore.
dUSt Posted December 2, 2004 Author Posted December 2, 2004 [img]http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0767827724.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg[/img]
homeschoolmom Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 whoa... (note to dUSt: I don't share a computer with any of those people.... )
dUSt Posted December 2, 2004 Author Posted December 2, 2004 The Amarkich family computer: [img]http://www.tallfamily.co.uk/david/photos/greece/sharing-ideas-at-computer.jpg[/img]
rachael Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='dUSt' date='Dec 1 2004, 07:28 PM'] The Amarkich family computer: [img]http://www.tallfamily.co.uk/david/photos/greece/sharing-ideas-at-computer.jpg[/img] [/quote] :crackup:
ICTHUS Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 (edited) I'm extremely confused. I also fail to see why two people sharing a computer is wrong - they could be siblings or roommates, after all.. Edited December 2, 2004 by ICTHUS
dUSt Posted December 2, 2004 Author Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='ICTHUS' date='Dec 1 2004, 07:30 PM'] I'm extremely confused. I also fail to see why two people sharing a computer is wrong - they could be siblings or roommates, after all.. [/quote] Did you see that picture?
Brother Adam Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 All four people were using the same computer. Most likely they some of these screennames that have been banned are all the same person. Dust has to suspend all people using the same person when one person is banned or they can use the other persons account. They were banned for personal attacks.
rachael Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='dUSt' date='Dec 1 2004, 07:31 PM'] Did you see that picture? [/quote] you amuse me dust.
IcePrincessKRS Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='Brother Adam' date='Dec 1 2004, 08:32 PM'] They were banned for personal attacks. [/quote] Among other things....
Paladin D Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='dUSt' date='Dec 1 2004, 08:15 PM'] Okay, scratch that. This game is over. [b]Permanent[/b] suspension for all four and whoever else signs up in the future who even resembles them. I am mighty. [/quote] You remind me of Emperor Palpatine. [b]ALL HAIL THE EMPIRE!!![/b] I'm starting to love this.
dUSt Posted December 2, 2004 Author Posted December 2, 2004 Seriously, they were banned because they simply were too high maintenance. Did they post personal attacks? Yes. Were they uncharitable? Yes. A lot of posters on phatmass do these things. The difference is that the other posters have enough respect to limit this type of behavior to a minimum. They didn't. If I had more time I'd deal with it, but I don't, so I won't. I do like those new caramel apple empenadas from Taco Bell though.
qfnol31 Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 Okay, now I'm mad...... You like Taco Bell! :angry:
homeschoolmom Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='dUSt' date='Dec 1 2004, 07:39 PM'] I do like those new caramel apple empenadas from Taco Bell though. [/quote]
Paladin D Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 [img]http://members.lycos.co.uk/thematrixd/EmperorBanned1.gif[/img]
azaelia Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='Paladin D' date='Dec 1 2004, 08:51 PM'] [img]http://members.lycos.co.uk/thematrixd/EmperorBanned1.gif[/img] [/quote]
Recommended Posts