Jaime Posted February 20, 2005 Posted February 20, 2005 And while I disagree with her on some issues, she is trying to pull republicans into being pro-life!!
Cam42 Posted February 20, 2005 Posted February 20, 2005 [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v672/camilam42/ann_al.jpg[/img] [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v672/camilam42/annreagan.jpg[/img] Yep....it's official, she is NOT multicultural.....oh wait....that is Al Sharpton, that bulwart of anti-multiculturalism....and also with my hero....Ronnie. Cam42 P.S. See how hot she is???!!!! Yowza!!! :plunger:
Norseman82 Posted February 20, 2005 Posted February 20, 2005 How old is she? Is she still single?????
Socrates Posted February 20, 2005 Posted February 20, 2005 I beleive she's now 42, or something like that. I actually find her too skinny and "angular" looking for my tastes. I actually met her while interning at the Human Events newspaper in Washington D.C., but I really didn't know who she was at the time, though her named seemed vaguely familiar. I later realized this was my brush with celebrity (this was before she became mega-famous) Her words to me were, "Where are you from? You've got a real Southern accent." At the meetings, she would speak through a remote conferencing speaker, which someone dubbed an "Ann-Droid." Anyway, all this has nothing to do with the debate.
Crusader_4 Posted February 20, 2005 Posted February 20, 2005 [quote name='crusader1234' date='Feb 20 2005, 03:23 AM'] It frightens me that anybody on Phatmass would consider [b]thinking some cultures are superior to others, being anti-multicultural, anti-ethnic, and anti-Muslim[/b] [/quote] Richard i do disagree with you here. I do believe that some cultures are superior to others. It would be in my opinnon a major fault not too. For example the culture spread by the nazis during WWII is hardly equal to the culture of the British Commonwealth at the time. The same could be said for example with the Taliban and the United States. There are such things as superior cultures.
Cam42 Posted February 20, 2005 Posted February 20, 2005 Yeah....and the culture of life is far superior to either political party which promote the culture of death, here in the USA. Cam42
curtins Posted February 20, 2005 Posted February 20, 2005 I like ann Coulter- I think shes very good. I doubt she is racist- I think that is just libral rhetoric. And if by any chance she is (which I doubt) I dont agree with that. But otherwise I really like her. She's awsome on Hanity and Colmes (sp?) when she shuts allan up.
crusader1234 Posted February 21, 2005 Author Posted February 21, 2005 I'm not saying Ann Coulter is racist, I was taking issue with a post made by Argent Paladin. Definitively racist attributes? I'd say Michael Filo is technically right, it isn't 'exactly' racist, but 'anti-Muslim' generally mean 'Middle Eastern' given the context of Ann Coulter. And while again I'm not saying I believe Ann Coulter is any of these things, it really makes me sick when somebody thinks being 'anti-Muslim' or 'anti-ethnic' doesn't make a person at the very least ignorant.
frozencell Posted February 21, 2005 Posted February 21, 2005 I like both O'Reilly and Coulter. I don't really see a whole lot wrong with either one of them...
crusader1234 Posted February 21, 2005 Author Posted February 21, 2005 Aside from the fact that they both fabricate more facts off the top of their head than most liberals and represent only one side of the story and one of them has been sued for sexual harassment... I don't see a ton wrong with them either I guess.
save ferris 101 Posted February 21, 2005 Posted February 21, 2005 [quote name='crusader1234' date='Feb 20 2005, 11:18 PM'] Aside from the fact that they both fabricate more facts off the top of their head than most liberals and represent only one side of the story and one of them has been sued for sexual harassment... I don't see a ton wrong with them either I guess. [/quote] Yeah, exactly. O'Reilly never lets anyone on his radio show ever say anything, and then when they try and talk over him, he gets mad at them. Like once, there was this leader of a group, who called himself a pastor, that was trying to get rid of Christmas stuff, you know the deal. And while that is stupid, or not, it's your opinion, all O'Reilly did the whole time was say that he wasn't a pastor, and asked him if he went to a school. I think they actually talked about the issue not even half of the time. Coulter is a bit better, and most of the time she is right about stuff and is very blunt, but sometimes she is just a bit extreme.
argent_paladin Posted February 22, 2005 Posted February 22, 2005 Ann does what all good lawyers do. She documents her facts, forcefully presents a point of view and makes the other side look as bad as possible. Your right, she is one sided. But she does cite her sources well. You just have to be careful because she is not going to help you make your argument for you. On the other hand, I don't really like O'Reilly. Actually, he isn't that conservative on a lot of things. I find his manner a bit brusque and overall I find the show not very useful.
Melchisedec Posted February 22, 2005 Posted February 22, 2005 Ann Coultier is the howard stern of right wingers. She is all shock. Likes to say stuff like 'liberals should be killed' among many hate filled words. She does not present a good case 1/2 the time. She is too busy drudging people through mud and creating more hate between the left and the right. I personally think she is absoultely racist but that is ofcourse just speculation. I really dont take her anymore seriously than I do any shock jock or michael moore. In fact I think the two are one in the same.
Kilroy the Ninja Posted February 22, 2005 Posted February 22, 2005 [quote name='Melchisedec' date='Feb 22 2005, 03:21 PM'] I really dont take her anymore seriously than I do any shock jock or michael moore. In fact I think the two are one in the same. [/quote] That is actually really funny!
crusader1234 Posted February 23, 2005 Author Posted February 23, 2005 [quote name='argent_paladin' date='Feb 22 2005, 06:41 AM'] She documents her facts, forcefully presents a point of view and makes the other side look as bad as possible. Your right, she is one sided. But she does cite her sources well. [/quote] She is one of the WORST people in news media at this present time as far as fabricating statistics or events. She'd get disbarred if she was a lawyer no doubt about it.
Cam42 Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 [quote]She'd get disbarred if she was a lawyer no doubt about it.[/quote] Uh, she is a lawyer. She got her J.D. from Michigan Law school. [quote]She is one of the WORST people in news media at this present time as far as fabricating statistics or events.[/quote] Sure....and she's not a lawyer. [quote]Ann Coultier is the howard stern of right wingers. She is all shock.[/quote] Ann COULTER is not anything of the sort. She is proof that a woman can be both powerful and conservative. Oh yeah, she's pro-life too. [url="http://anncoulter.org/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=39"]Ann Coulter on Abortion[/url] What a powerful and straightforward person. How can we not support her when she stands for life like this? [quote]The only thing we need to do now is to start "changing laws." A culture of life cannot even begin -– much less be sustained — until we change the law and repeal Roe v. Wade. Only then can we tally up how many hearts have been changed. (Ann Coulter)[/quote] SHOCKING!!!! Cam42
crusader1234 Posted February 23, 2005 Author Posted February 23, 2005 [quote name='Cam42' date='Feb 22 2005, 09:16 PM'] Uh, she is a lawyer. She got her J.D. from Michigan Law school. [/quote] Lawyers get disbarred for what they say in court, not on TV. I was saying that from a 'factual standpoint' if a lawyer presented points like her in Court she would be disbarred. [quote]Sure....and she's not a lawyer.[/quote] We're talking about her in the context of her public appearances. What she does in her legal profession isn't being discussed. [quote]Ann COULTER is not anything of the sort. She is proof that a woman can be both powerful and conservative. Oh yeah, she's pro-life too.[/quote] Actually, she isn't that powerful - and she IS a shock jock. She doesn't bring anything new to the table, she doesn't pass any bills, she doesn't elect any Supreme Court Justices... she's just basically a lady that people find amusing due to her manner of speaking. People watch her because she says stuff like 'Shut up Canada or we'll roll over and squish you' and they think its funny. She doesn't have anything that original to say. She is basically a RW Michael Moore without as much creativity and harsher words.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now