Televised Masses

[cmotherofpirl]

Televised Masses

There were several interesting addenda to our column regarding televised Masses (Jan. 18).

An extraordinary minister of holy Communion in Virginia who attends a homebound person asked if it were permissible for him to "to record a Sunday Mass to be used when I take Communion to a person unable to go to Church. I record the Mass from EWTN while I attend Mass at my parish church and obtain the sacred Host. I retrieve the tape and immediately go to the homebound person. Then I play the tape which includes everything from the entrance procession, prayers, readings, homily and petitions of the faithful. At that point I stop the recording and say the Our Father with the person and give her Communion. I only use it on the same day that the Mass was being said. The person understands that it is a recording of that Sundays Mass."

I think that some distinction needs to be made. As an extraordinary minister of holy Communion you should always fulfill the rites of the Church just as they are set out in the liturgical books.

Therefore while you do a good thing in bringing the tape, it may not substitute the rites of introduction and the reading foreseen in the rite of Communion to the sick, and the two things should be kept separate although you would probably be justified in using the briefer form of the rite.

Perhaps you would save time and complications if you were to make it possible for the person involved to watch the Mass on EWTN herself and time your arrival toward the end of the transmission.

Another two questions involved not so much the transmission of Mass on television but within the context of a celebration.

From the Australian state of Victoria a correspondent wrote: "Masses at one large local church are now 'telecast' to the congregation on several large video screens, including one on each pillar at either side of the altar. The view and angles are continually altered for best position, and prayers and hymn words are displayed at the necessary times. I find the intrusion enormous, and its spectacular nature distracting and disappointing. Are there any recommendations for the level of appropriate technological intervention?"

Meanwhile, a U.S. reader asked: "What about Masses that have the overflow crowd across the parking lot at a parish hall, watching the Mass on closed-circuit TV? Someone brings Communion over at the appropriate time, but does this count as participating in the sacrifice of the Mass?"

The two situations, while apparently similar, are actually very different.

The general principle is that one must physically assist at Mass as part of a cohesive assembly. The assembly may be very large but must in some way form a recognizable whole.

The first situation, that of enhancing visibility via the use of large screens, may be useful and even necessary on some very special occasions when many participants are at some distance from the altar or some special rite, such as a priestly or episcopal ordination, is carried out.

This is usually done during papal Masses in St. Peter's Square, although I don't remember ever having seen it done within the basilica itself despite its being the world's largest Church.

This may also be because the lateral naves are never occupied during Mass, so everyone can see the altar even though, frankly, one sees little from the back.

Because we are almost all children of the television age, it is necessary to rein in the cameramen so that they concentrate on the essential rites and avoid special effects, such as zooming in on children, which only cause distraction and dispersion.

My own experience is that one's attention is naturally drawn toward the projection even when the altar is clearly visible.

The danger is that one adopts the passive attitude typical of television gazing in such a way that the spiritual exercise of active participation in offering the holy sacrifice of the Mass with and through the priest is impeded.

In this way one may be mentally in the same situation as those who follow a Mass on television, even though from a formal point of view one is present at the celebration.

For this reason I do not think that it is pastorally prudent to habitually use these projections. Yet, since they are a relatively new technology, I do not know if any official declarations have been made.

From what we have said, it should be clear that the second situation, that of following the Mass from the parish hall, is incorrect and is not sufficient to fulfill the Sunday precept.

Some other solution should be found to cater for the overflow, either adding Masses or seeking an alternative venue.

It might even be permissible, as an extreme solution, to set up television screens outside the church, which would in some way preserve the unity of the assembly. But they may not be in another location.

For example, I remember that for the beatification of (now Saint) Pio of Pietrelcina, logistics made it necessary to divide the assembly between two Roman sites: St. Peter's Square and St. John Lateran.

On this occasion a cardinal celebrated Sunday Mass for the pilgrims at St. John's before the beatification ceremony began and then all present followed the ceremony at St. Peter's on television screens.

[phatcatholic]

very interesting............thanks