Jump to content
Join our Facebook Group Ă—
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Diabolical Heretic Martin Luther & Bible


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Whoa...that was definitely a mouthful.

I'm still waiting for a protestant to explain their interpretation of John 20:23. If Jesus was not speaking of confessing sins aloud, what was he speaking of?? Bro Adam?? Mulls?? Anybody?

Edited by nippy316
Posted

Whoa...that was definitely a mouthful.

I'm still waiting for a protestant to explain their interpretation of John 20:23. If Jesus was not speaking of confessing sins aloud, what was he speaking of?? Bro Adam?? Mulls?? Anybody?

Got another to add to your list....

St James 5:14

Is anyone among you sick? He should summon the presbyters of the church, and they should pray over him and anoint (him) with oil in the name of the Lord,

15 and the prayer of faith will save the sick person, and the Lord will raise him up. If he has committed any sins, he will be forgiven.

16 Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The fervent prayer of a righteous person is very powerful.

GBLCM,

ironmonk

Posted

Got another to add to your list....

St James 5:14

Is anyone among you sick? He should summon the presbyters of the church, and they should pray over him and anoint (him) with oil in the name of the Lord,

15 and the prayer of faith will save the sick person, and the Lord will raise him up. If he has committed any sins, he will be forgiven.

16 Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The fervent prayer of a righteous person is very powerful.

GBLCM,

ironmonk

Thanks Ironmonk!! The list of misunderstood verses growing quickly...

Here it is so far:

- John 20:23

- John 6:51-56

- Matthew 16:18-19

- James 5:14

If ANY protestant out there would like to take a stab at explaining your interpretation of ANY of these verses to me, shoot away.

We should make a thread about this...maybe.

Posted (edited)

The Jews of 90 AD took out books of the OT. They did not like the fact that the Christians and the Jews used the same Canon.

"The Massorah" - Is the book luther used for the kjv because it was from the Jews, and it was something the Church didn't use... He built a lie saying that the Church added the books, when it was the other way around, it was the Jews that took the books out in 90 AD.

I think that is what the Priest meant without going into great detail.

Anytime a anti-Catholic wants to argue the books of the Bible... this quote always shuts them up...

"We are compelled to concede to the Papists that they have the Word of God, that we received it from them, and that without them we should have no knowledge of it at all."

~ Martin Luther, Commentary on St. John

At the time Jesus was born, there were two collections of Sacred Scriptures used in Jewish synagogues. One, in Hebrew, was in use in Palestine. The other, a Greek translation from the Hebrew, was in use in the lands of the Diaspora.

Many of the brightest and most successful Jews were deported from their homeland by the Babylonians during the Captivity c. 587 - 538 B.C. This was called the Diaspora, or scattering. These Jews were exiled to Greek speaking lands and, over time, learned Greek and forgot their native language. By the 2nd century B.C., it was necessary for their Sacred Scriptures to be translated into Greek, since they could no longer understand Hebrew. This translation was called the Septuagint.

The Palestinian Rabbis who met at Jamnia c. 100 A.D. set the canon of Scripture for Jews for the first time. There was never a canon of approved Scripture for Jews until then. One of the criteria the rabbis established for their canon was the requirement that the writings had to be in Hebrew. The motivation for this was that (1) Jesus and the Apostles used the Greek Septuagint, and the Catholic Church had inherited it, (2) the Church was using the Septuagint with its messianic prophecies to evangelize both pagans and Jews, (3) many Jews had become Christians (Catholics), and the rabbis were attempting to cut their losses. So -- the Greek Scriptures had to go.

Originally, the two collections were the same, but five of the Hebrew scrolls were eventually lost and survived only in Greek translation: Judith, Tobit, 1 Maccabees, Baruch, and Ecclesiasticus (aka Sirach). And two works used in the Diaspora were originally written in Greek -- Wisdom and 2 Maccabees. So at the time the Palestinian canon was set, there were fewer writings in Hebrew than in Greek.

So, seven books and parts of Esther and Daniel in the Alexandrian (Greek) Canon were excluded from the Palestinian (Hebrew) Canon.

Martin Luther lived from 1483 to 1546. The King James Version of the Bible was published in 1611. Luther had nothing to do with it.

But in 1534 when Luther translated his German Bible, he hit upon the idea of rejecting the same 7 books and parts of Esther and Daniel that the rabbis had rejected centuries before. His real target was 2 Maccabees because it supported the doctrine of Purgatory, which he hated. So he just declared that if an OT writing wasn't in Hebrew, it wasn't Scripture -- and he put those 7 books, with the pages unnumbered to show his disdain for them, at the back of his Bible separated from the writings he regarded as Scripture.

To tell the rest of the story, Luther also rejected Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation from the New Testament and put them, pages unnumbered, at the back of his Bible also, so all of his rejected writings were together. His followers were willing to tolerate Luther's desecration of the OT but drew the line at the NT, and later restored them to their rightful place in the Scriptures.

The original KJV included the 7 books and parts of Esther and Daniel, but put them at the back, separate from the rest of the books Luther (and all Protestants)regarded as Scripture, just as Luther did in his German Bible.

The KJV was "authorized" by the Church of England under King James, a notorious and scandalous public sinner.

JMJ Jay (Likos)

Edited by Katholikos
hyperdulia again
Posted

king james was a queen.

Posted

St. John, Chapter 3:

11 Amen, amen, I say to you, we speak of what we know and we testify to what we have seen, but you people do not accept our testimony.

12

If I tell you about earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you about heavenly things?

13

No one has gone up to heaven except the one who has come down from heaven, the Son of Man.

14

And just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert, so must the Son of Man be lifted up,

15

so that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life."

16

For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him might not perish but might have eternal life.

17

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him.

18

Whoever believes in him will not be condemned, but whoever does not believe has already been condemned, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.

19

And this is the verdict, that the light came into the world, but people preferred darkness to light, because their works were evil.

20

For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come toward the light, so that his works might not be exposed.

21

But whoever lives the truth comes to the light, so that his works may be clearly seen as done in God.

22

After this, Jesus and his disciples went into the region of Judea, where he spent some time with them baptizing.

In Scripture, the Catholic Church is likened to a city on a hill; the Catholic faith to a light or lamp, not to placed under a bushel basket, but set high to give light in darkness.

Can it be that some think they are serving Christ, but are truly following the doctrines of men?

Saint Matthew 7,21.24-27.

Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. Everyone who listens to these words of mine and acts on them will be like a wise man who built his house on rock. The rain fell, the floods came, and the winds blew and buffeted the house. But it did not collapse; it had been set solidly on rock. And everyone who listens to these words of mine but does not act on them will be like a fool who built his house on sand. The rain fell, the floods came, and the winds blew and buffeted the house. And it collapsed and was completely ruined."

Jesus seems pretty clear here that we can't just say that we believe; we must listen to his teachings, understand what they mean, and live by them.

His teachings are found most clearly, are defined, and with His authority imparted to the faithful, in the Catholic Church.

I take John 3:16 very seriously, but not superficially.

Posted

John 3:16: ...everyone who believes in Him....

John 6:56:...He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him

So, who is "everyone who believes in Him?"

My Faith and reasoning tells me that it is everyone who believes in Him, in His name, in His True Presence in the Blessed Sacrament, and in His Church, to which He promised, "I am with you always..." Everyone who believes in Him and believes in what He taught the Apostles:

Matthew 28:20...teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age.

Posted

king james was a queen.

Rex fuit Elizabeth: nunc est regina Jacobus—"Elizabeth was King: now James is Queen."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...