MichaelFilo Posted April 29, 2005 Posted April 29, 2005 [quote name='philothea' date='Apr 28 2005, 01:47 PM'] Olean (olestra), Splenda (sucralose), and Nutraasweet (aspartame) have made the possibility of nutritionless food real. It's only possible with high-tech manufacturing, of course. I think there weill be truly zero-calorie foods not too far in the future. Then would there be a moral issue, do you think? [/quote] There is one thing you should notice. Even if you remove the nutrition from something, it will still at least include basic things like fat (which is neccessary for the body). Unless a food can be devoid of all things (thus becoming nothing, which is impossible) it will have at least some positive effect on your body. Even eating radioactive uranium has nutrious value..... of course it'd be immoral since it's suicide, but the nutrition is still there. God bless, Mikey
Carnanc Posted April 29, 2005 Posted April 29, 2005 right, even if nutrition is lacking, you have to also look at the negative aspects of any food. What may have a good range of vitamins, may have a high ammount of transfats.
philothea Posted April 29, 2005 Posted April 29, 2005 [quote name='MichaelFilo' date='Apr 28 2005, 07:42 PM'] There is one thing you should notice. Even if you remove the nutrition from something, it will still at least include basic things like fat (which is neccessary for the body). Unless a food can be devoid of all things (thus becoming nothing, which is impossible) it will have at least some positive effect on your body. [/quote] (Shoot. Sorry about all the typos. No idea what happened.) Umm, no. Only certain organic substances have nutritious value. Your body has very specific requirements. Olestra is synthetic combination of a fat molecule and a sugar molecule. It looks like an oil. It's 100% free of [b]any[/b] nutritive value because it is too large to be absorbed by your intestinal wall. It passes right though, untouched. Olestra is used to fry "Wow" brand Frito-Lay snack foods. There are no calories from fat in those products. Obviously if people could eat any old thing and get nutrition from it, no one would starve to death! Just theoretically: if you could eat, say, big cheeseburgers that had absolutely no nutritive value, do you think that would be sinful? I tend to think so, personally.
Socrates Posted April 29, 2005 Posted April 29, 2005 [quote name='philothea' date='Apr 27 2005, 12:49 AM'] Me and my scruples have been all over this issue, many, many times! (Argh!) The ideal seems to be what saints all seem to exemplify: food is a tool to serve God, and what you eat should not matter to you at all. Feasting, fasting, good stuff, icky stuff, it doesn't matter -- like St. Bernard who drank a glass of oil instead of wine and didn't even notice it. However, not being a saint (grr) I get hungry and I want yummy stuff. I also have a lot of weird dietary concerns. And I obsess. It gets complicated. I want to eat only healthy things in moderate quantities, and ideally to eat "poorer" food when I have the choice rather than luxurious stuff. In practice I sometimes go overboard. I tried LOTS of fasting, but that seemed to just make me more food obsessed than ever. I have finally concluded that what I eat is not really that big a deal, so long as I don't commit any sins against charity, get attached to any particular food or preparation, or make myself ill. I'm sure this wasn't helpful at all, sorry. Just babbling. [/quote] In all seriousness, it sounds like you might have an eating disorder. Eating and food should not be a source of obsession or scruples (and is not for psychologically healthy people).
philothea Posted May 2, 2005 Posted May 2, 2005 [quote name='Socrates' date='Apr 29 2005, 01:25 PM'] In all seriousness, it sounds like you might have an eating disorder. Eating and food should not be a source of obsession or scruples (and is not for psychologically healthy people). [/quote] Mmmmmaybe. But, I am not any more messed up and scrupulous about food than I am about anything else. I think I have a universal disorder. Anyway, I am getting more sensible about the food thing. Could be there's hope for me yet. (I replied to this a few days ago and hit "Add Reply", and the Phorum vanished. I hope it doesn't happen again!)
dairygirl4u2c Posted August 14, 2006 Author Posted August 14, 2006 There's a difference btween gluttony and simpy eating a few nutrietionless snacks here and there. As you've noted, there's a parrlllell to contraception. One doesn't necessarily become a sex addict because he uses contraception once inawhile. You shouldn't expain why gluttony is wrong, but why eating nutrionless food once in awhile is wrong.
goldenchild17 Posted September 7, 2006 Posted September 7, 2006 [quote name='dairygirl4u2c' post='577959' date='Apr 25 2005, 03:33 PM'] *declared by the pope for catholics, that is* I assume it could be, as it could just be something that has been overlooked. Isn't eating food/candy that provides no calories and no nutrition separating the good taste aspect of food from the nutritional aspect and thus going against the natural law? Furthermore, abuse of said food/candy could lead to addiction.. This thread should have these focuses: one explaining whether or not it is immoral and two on discussing whether or not it's possible to have it and/or something overlooked in general be declared immoral. [/quote] Interesting question. As for declaring it immoral due solely to the taste factor being separate from other aspects of food, I don't think so. After all, the Church does not forbid things of purely entertainment value (that I know of). Now, getting addicted to it, that might be something to think about as addiction to anything is not good. And eating too much of it can affect your body in a negative way. And we are called to care for our physical bodies as well as our spiritual bodies and I think if eating these things too much can harm our bodies, then yes it's not too nuts to think that it might be considered immoral to do so.
Loyola Posted September 7, 2006 Posted September 7, 2006 I voted maybe. I think America at large (no pun intended) should tone down on the bad food we eat. It is hard with all of the easy and cheap options available to us. Plus add in the advertising or brainwashing campaigns that push us to eat the junk. [u]SuperSize Me[/u] was a great movie.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now