1337 k4th0l1x0r Posted August 8, 2005 Posted August 8, 2005 You've gotta love it! The best part is the gay community is outraged over this. [url="http://www.ottawasun.com/News/National/2005/08/07/1162543-sun.html"]http://www.ottawasun.com/News/National/200...162543-sun.html[/url]
CatholicCid Posted August 8, 2005 Posted August 8, 2005 "Generally speaking, marriage should be for love," he said. "People who don't marry for love will find themselves in trouble." o_o That'll be the day... Canada decides who loves who
goldenchild17 Posted August 8, 2005 Posted August 8, 2005 [quote name='Kaeldra' date='Aug 8 2005, 01:30 AM']hahahaha that's funny as hell. [right][snapback]676708[/snapback][/right] [/quote] umm, I don't think hell is all that funny...
Carrie Posted August 8, 2005 Posted August 8, 2005 [quote name='the_rev' date='Aug 8 2005, 10:50 AM']Crazy Canadians [right][snapback]676827[/snapback][/right] [/quote]
Theoketos Posted August 8, 2005 Posted August 8, 2005 The webfilter at work will not let me watch it.
IcePrincessKRS Posted August 8, 2005 Posted August 8, 2005 For those with filters, here is the article: qwerty aisle for straight guys WHAT'S LOVE got to do with it? Bill Dalrymple, 56, and best friend Bryan Pinn, 65, have decided to take the plunge and try out the new same-sex marriage legislation with a twist -- they're straight men. "I think it's a hoot," Pinn said. The proposal came last Monday at a Toronto bar amid shock and laughter from their friends. But the two -- both of whom were previously married and both of whom are looking for a good woman to love -- insist that after the humour subsided, a real issue lies at the heart of it all. "There are significant tax implications that we don't think the government has thought through," Pinn said. Dalrymple has been to see a lawyer already and there are no laws in marriage that define sexual preference. 'STAY OUT OF THE BEDROOMS' They want to shed light on the widespread financial implications of the new legislation and are willing to take it all the way. There are obvious tax benefits to marriage, they said, but insisted they don't want their nuptials to insult gays and lesbians. "I disagree with the government getting involved with what people should and shouldn't do," Dalrymple said. "Stay out of the bedrooms." Words of warning came from Toronto lawyer Bruce Walker, a gay and lesbian rights activist. "Generally speaking, marriage should be for love," he said. "People who don't marry for love will find themselves in trouble." Walker isn't personally insulted by the planned Pinn-Dalrymple union because he believes in personal freedoms and rights. "If someone wants to do something foolish, let them do it," he said. As for wedding plans, Pinn and Dalrymple haven't set a date.
Didacus Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 [url="http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/oct/05101110.html"]http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/oct/05101110.html[/url] And now our national representatives are even taking the plunge! Oh Canada... how far have you fallen?
Luthien Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 Oh its fine for them to say who should and shouldn't get married, but if the Church says anything we're intolerant. Whatever.
Didacus Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 Has anyone gotten an update on this story? Did anyone hear about Canada now looking to legalize polygamy? If ever it happens, does anyone want ot marry me? I guess a husband would be nice, seeing that I already have a wife and all. I'd have a spouse to clean to house, and a spouse to go to work; leaving my days filled with beer and care-free!
argent_paladin Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 [quote name='IcePrincessKRS' date='Aug 8 2005, 09:13 AM'] "Generally speaking, marriage should be for love," he said. [/quote] Wait, who is he that he thinks he can define marriage like that?! Who is he that he can dictate to everyone what marriage "should" be?! It is pretty funny, actually.
Church Punk Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 I think this illustrates how rediculous the liberal government actions were and to neglected the thought of such things. This is how stupid its gotten...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now