Disturbing news about Catholic Answers

[Benedict]

I never even heard of people believing in geocentrism until Sungenis started pushing/defending it.

I find it implausible.

Anyone who loves physics might enjoy [url="http://catholicoutlook.com/geocentrism.php"]these debates[/url] featuring Gary Hoge, "the man" when it comes to helio-geocentrism debates.

As far as I have seen, Mr. Sungenis' arguments have come down to "you can't prove with certainty that geocentrism is wrong", leaving nothing but the seemingly endless flood of evidence that shows it to be highly unlikely compared to heliocentrism.

[argent_paladin]

You know, the debate on the merits of geocentrism doesn't show how Karl Keating's denial of a young earth can possibly be anti-geocentrist. They are two different things and not logically related to one another. They are only related because the both depend on a very literal reading of scripture and a firm denial of modern cosmological theory. But my question is, you said that Keating was anti-geocentric, but offered evidence only that he was anti-young earth. Did you mix up your terms? Or did you mix up the citations?