The New Jerome Biblical Commentary

[shortnun]

[quote name='nacnewman006' date='Oct 10 2005, 06:42 AM']Does this answer your question? I am not against hist.-crit., but I definitely think that it should not be the only way to interpret the Bible. It is a good method for what it needs to do, but I have read too many extreme positions to like it much anymore (yes, that is a bias I have toward it). Peace!
[right][snapback]752311[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

I realize that the historical-critical methods are merely human interpretations on the Word (meaning that they can be incomplete, even inaccurate). My questions were mainly about the NJBC, as I am using it for a class now. I didn't know if you had any examples from it where Brown inappropriately (inaccurately) refutes certain beliefs of the faith.

I consider my current scriptures professor to be quite knowledgable and would look forward to bringing some of your criticisms to him so that I may better understand Brown and the [u]New Jerome Biblical Commentary[/u].



Theoketos- do you really mean to say that the NJBC's statements about the Gospel writers are..... (complete my/your though)...... You say something about "premises for unbelief"- would you mind elaborating, please?

Thanks and peace!

[nacnewman006]

I will look for some stuff. Turns out that I have the same book for one of my classes... (jerome biblical commentary). Peace!

[phatcatholic]

[quote name='phatcatholic' date='Oct 4 2005, 08:40 PM']give me some time, i'm knee-deep in other stuff right now. until then, check out the articles found here:
[url="http://www.phatmass.com/directory/index.php/cat_id/698"]http://www.phatmass.com/directory/index.php/cat_id/698[/url]

if the article isn't specifically about Brown, then its about his methods. should be educational
[right][snapback]746295[/snapback][/right][/quote]
shortnun, did u read these articles?