Christie_M Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 never tryed the zero one, but I like diet the best.
Aloysius Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 what does it matter? they both contain sugar substitutes that cause cancer.. so it's a choice of either getting fat or getting cancer... hmm... I'll choose the regular fattening coke haha, of course, everything causes cancer nowadays (even phatmass! I heard it on the news!, but most especially democrats, democrats cause the most cancer) so it's cool for diabetics and such, but to the average joe shmoe non-diabetic, just take the sugary kind and don't risk the artificial cancer-sugar-substitute
photosynthesis Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 eh, I know I'm going to get cancer anyway... some kind of cancer. besides, cancer is really hip and cool... look how much media attention it gets! my friend Peter, before he died, joked about how he wished he could have died from cancer because it's hipper and cooler than what he had (some stomach problem)
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 cancer is hip though i don't really know why.
doc Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 I am addicted to coke, and I think I already have cancer, just that I dont know wich one! lol..... :
God Conquers Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 [quote name='inDEED' date='Nov 23 2005, 08:39 PM']...hmmm... Anyone else wondering how this dude knows this? : [right][snapback]799317[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Sorry for the confusion... One time my brother and I were at the farm. We were eating some pudding out in the field, when my brother heard my mom calling. When he went to investigate, as a gag I placed some cow poo into his pudding. He came back and he ate it!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHA oh wait.... wait........ The funniest thing is..... I don't HAVE a brother! I ATE THE POO!!!!!
homeschoolmom Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 Coke should get out of the "diet cola" business and leave it to Pepsi.
Paphnutius Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 I try to refrain from coke products. Coca-Cola has a ph balance of 2.0, battery acid has a ph of 1.0............hmmm........water is around neutral so I will stick with that, or if nothing else Fresca...
Linda Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 All kind of diet coke is addictive so be carefull
zabbazooey Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 [quote name='homeschoolmom' date='Nov 25 2005, 07:57 AM']Coke should get out of the "diet cola" business and leave it to Pepsi. [right][snapback]800050[/snapback][/right] [/quote] My thoughts exactly.
ryanmeyersmusic Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 ok, someone has to acknowledge the hipness of a jesse spanno = caffiene addict reference
prose Posted November 27, 2005 Author Posted November 27, 2005 [quote]Diabetics can drink one and not the other.[/quote] My diabetic friend says he can drink both.... Is there something we don't know?
argent_paladin Posted November 27, 2005 Posted November 27, 2005 Coca-Cola Zero is a product of the Coca-Cola company, released in June 2005. It is a sugar-free variation of Coca-Cola Classic, sweetened with a blend of aspartame and acesulfame potassium. This product is different from Diet Coke because of the sweeteners it uses (Diet Coke only uses aspartame), and because, unlike Diet Coke, [b]this product is based on the original Coca-Cola formula. Diet Coke was an entirely new formula which would eventually become the basis for the controversial New Coke (later renamed Coke II).[/b] Coca-Cola Light Contrary to popular belief, Coca-Cola Zero is not a new product. The same blend of aspartame and acesulfame potassium along with the Coca-Cola Classic formula has been available for quite some time in many European countries which were never exposed to New Coke. Commonly called Coca-Cola Light or Coca Light in Europe, the Coca-Cola Zero formula is identical to that used in foreign countries. In addition to never having been introduced to New Coke, part of the basis for the decision to market this different product was determined by health regulations in the various countries. In 1970 both the United States and the United Kingdom placed a ban on cyclamates due to fears of possible carcinogenic effects. The ban on acesulfame potassium was lifted in the mid 1980's in all countries except Canada, which approved its use in 1994. The lifting of the ban and new studies refuting the carcinogenic nature of acesulfame potassium paved the way for a more broad use of the compound across the globe, and allowing for the long standard European version of Diet Coke to come to North America. Controversy Despite current studies indicating the safety of aspartame and acesulfame potassium there are still wide concerns amongst consumers about the safety of these compounds. More information about this controversy can be found in the main article on diet Coca-Cola products, or the articles on the compounds in question. This product is not to be confused with "Diet Coke sweetened with Splenda," which is based on the Diet Coke/New Coke/Coke II formula and is sweetened with sucralose (under the trademark Splenda). It is also not to be confused with Coke C2, a 45-calorie variant of Coca-Cola Classic.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now