Romans debate

[N/A Gone]

Hi..

I go to a protestant school, and in a class of mine I have to do some heavy exegesis on a romans chapter/section to justify my interepretation on it. I was either going to do an in-depth look at how sin is an addiction, or how blueprint theology is refuted. But I was curious if any body can give me a section and some help if there is something that sparks some catholic support anywhere in romans?

thanks for anything. My teacher is a great patristic ecumenical theology(fluff, bow your head for the holy weedman) and would be catholic if not for an eccesiological diference

[phatcatholic]

start with these two articles:
--[url="http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?showtopic=37197"][b]Rescuing Romans from the Reformers[/b][/url] by Jacob Michael
--[url="http://catholic-legate.com/dialogues/rescuingromans.html"][b]Rescuing Romans from the Reformers [i]Again[/i][/b][/url] by John Pacheco

[phatcatholic]

also see the commentary and other resources on Romans that i have collected so far:

Romans
[url="http://www.phatmass.com/directory/index.php/cat_id/715"]http://www.phatmass.com/directory/index.php/cat_id/715[/url]

[N/A Gone]

I will look thru those, I basically need a small section I can exegest thru..thanks phatty

[phatcatholic]

those articles should give you plenty of examples since they focusing on defending the catholic understanding of the letter.

[N/A Gone]

thanks...