Jake Huether Posted December 11, 2003 Author Posted December 11, 2003 Uhhh, as I understand it, God came to inhabit matter (a man). Christ still had the "substance" of a man. After all, He was "true God and True Man" This is an oxymoron. God didn't "inhabit matter". God became matter. To inhabit is NOT to be. I inhabit my home. But I don't become my home. If God merely inhabited a man, then the man wasn't "True God" (which blows your last statement way).
God Conquers Posted December 11, 2003 Posted December 11, 2003 am I missing something here? Like a post?
Jake Huether Posted December 11, 2003 Author Posted December 11, 2003 am I missing something here? Like a post? I know. I felt the same way???
vianney Posted December 11, 2003 Posted December 11, 2003 uggg ha ha i dont understand ha ha....okkk ha ha how bout them yankees?
Seatbelt Blue Posted December 11, 2003 Posted December 11, 2003 uggg ha ha i dont understand ha ha....okkk ha ha how bout them yankees? They lost to a bunch of fish. <_<
foundsheep Posted December 11, 2003 Posted December 11, 2003 Does anyone have blind faith anymore. Do we really need documentation to believe?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now