Pio Nono Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 JMJ 12/11 - Gaudete Sunday Laying aside the question of "brain death", can vital organs be removed from the body after clinical death but before somatic cell death?
jmjtina Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Why is taking the face off of someone else rubbing me the wrong way? Transplants are one thing: heart, liver, etc, [i]but faces[/i]? And correct me if I'm wrong, but when did a "face" become a " vital organ"? To me, you can live without it, unlike a heart, liver or kidney. (or get some surgery done on your face.) There are alternatives. To me it's stripping the human dignity of the person when we allow someone to strip the face off of someone else.
prose Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Did you see the transplant? It wasn't a face, really. I dog had mauled her when she was unconscious after an overdose and she lost her nose, chin, and jaw. she had nothing left on her face. I am not sure she could survive or not, but she certainly doesn't look pretty, so it wasn't for cosmetics. It was more to give her use of her lower face. ****** So on another note, I still don't understand. Does the Church reject transplants? Are we supposed to oppose them?
jmjtina Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 (edited) the fact that is being debated is "brain death" and the ethical use of transplants. This is a new transplant. Transplants are okay if done ethically as stated, but this recent transplant has come under fire for being unethical. The Church sets the criteria, the problem is when the scientific and health feild don't agree on the set criteria. So they take off the face of someone to put pieces back together? I'm not trying to be unsensitive, but I've seen pictures of people without those, most notably when I was doing research on climbers from Mt. Everest who had gotten extreme frostbite. The problem is when they take a face (pieces, a whole face, does it matter?) from someone else, because they claim they are "dead". As stated, the criteria for "brain death" varies greatly from the U.S. and Europe. And that's scary. Edited December 12, 2005 by jmjtina
photosynthesis Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 i don't see what the big deal is with the immunosuppressants
Pio Nono Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 JMJ 12/12 - Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe Does "brain death" include clinical death?
Pio Nono Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 JMJ 12/12 - Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe Yes, I read it, and I got the feeling that it was about what constitutes brain death. Since the definition seemed so fluid, I didn't know whether it could include clinical death. So, my question is, is it ethical to remove vital organs from someone who has entered clinical death but not somatic cell death? Or are organs useless by this time?
Lounge Daddy Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 [quote name='Ash Wednesday' date='Dec 10 2005, 11:28 AM']I didn't initially have a problem with the woman having a face transplant -- until reading that it was from a live donor. Eww. [right][snapback]819665[/snapback][/right] [/quote] oh, me also i thought is was kinda cool... but now i love how it is decided ahead of time how a story will be presented by the msm, and facts and details that come up after the fact are ignored grrrrrr...
Lounge Daddy Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 related Onion News: [quote][b]Autopsy Reveals Subject Was Still Alive When Autopsy Began[/b] County coroner James Hextall announced Monday that a thorough autopsy of C. W. Milodragovitch, a local tavern owner pulled from an automobile accident last Saturday night, revealed that the man had been alive at the start of the autopsy. "Our findings reveal that Mr. Milodragovitch lost a great deal of blood from a very deep Y-shaped incision in his torso, which extended from his shoulders to the pubic bone," Hextall said. "There is also evidence of defensive wounds on the fingers, most likely produced from fighting off a scalpel, and the wrists show ligature abrasions where the subject resisted being restrained to an examination table and having his still-beating heart removed and weighed." The sheriff's office has ruled the death an accident pending an autopsy.[/quote] [url="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/43453"]article here[/url]
Lounge Daddy Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 but maybe there will be a day soon when that wont be funny - only because it is no big deal...
Cow of Shame Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 [quote name='jmjtina' date='Dec 11 2005, 08:40 PM'] To me it's stripping the human dignity of the person when we allow someone to strip the face off of someone else. [right][snapback]820972[/snapback][/right] [/quote] We aren't talking [url="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119094/"][i]Face Off[/i][/url] here. I think this is just a temporary measure...a step in the right direction...until we are able to generate bits of faces in petri dishes.
dUSt Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 The only way I would want a face transplant is if I could get it from a "brain dead" black dude. That would be sweet. Then I could say that I was bi-racial.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now