iraq and al queda connection

[kamiller42]

Bush did draw a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda, but [b]not[/b] to 9/11.

So what is the evidence?

[url="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/550kmbzd.asp"]Saddam's Terror Camps[/url]

[url="http://www.cnsnews.com//ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=\SpecialReports\archive\200410\SPE20041004a.html"]Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties[/url]

[url="http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200410070845.asp"]Can Bush say, “Boogie to Baghdad”?[/url]

[url="http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp"]The U.S. government's secret memo detailing cooperation between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. [/url]

[url="http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200310210934.asp"]Saddam's Terror Ties[/url]

[url="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/167gwjtp.asp"] Two new members of the Iraqi interim government insist that Saddam and al Qaeda were linked.[/url]

[url="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39025"]Overwhelming evidence of connection[/url]

Happy reading! If you need more sources, I can provide.

[Winchester]

The above was poste on the 10th. Since then, I've seen no responses from anyone in the anti-Bush camp. Why do I put it thus? Because I have never in my life seen a more irrational, arrogant group of nabobs united in hatred of one individual, willing to obfuscate, insult and pander to the opposition.

If the above are all false, then please in the name of truth post the rebuttals. I'd like actual facts instead of the usual "No WMDs were found" That's a statement, not evidence. I know how the media operates--I've seen first hand what they do to truth.


The very least dairy girl could do is acknowledge the response. Looking at her profile, she was active yesterday.

I issue this challenge. I believe I've issued it before: flooping respond! Even if you are not comfortable with the thing contradicting your viewpoint, have the cojones to say it, or the common damned courtesy to say "I'll look into it."

[dairygirl4u2c]

I withdrew my stance. Maybe you need to read closer. What more do you want?
If you want others to admit the evidence isn't in our favor, I would like to see that too.

Also on that note, my willingness to withdraw my stance does a whole lot more than anyone here has ever done that I have seen when it comes to being wrong or at least admitting the evidence doesn't look good in your favor. That goes for both "liberals" and "conservatives", "catholics" and "protestants". Anything I post that rubs against catholics and conservatives are usually ignored. I'm just noting this as these are the people that claim the prots/iiberals do the same thing, which they do, but the caths/cons don't ever admit things either. These people usually like to respond to obviously extermist irrational liberal/protestants instead of the people with rational arguments. My threads often go on responded to, or points in my favor go unacknowledged..
(look at the outside of the cc threads, the pot threads, etc)
And on that note, perhaps you should be willing to admit you did not read very close since I did indeed withdraw my stance.

Edited February 14, 2006 by dairygirl4u2c

[Winchester]

Of course I'm willing to admit it. Done it before and will likely do it again. I misinterpreted the first line of your post and was so taken by said misinterpretation that I launched into my tirade.

I do note that apart from you, I've seen little more from the opposition on this thread, which makes your integrity stand out that much more and make my breach that much much more inexcusable. You have my humblest apologies in this regard.

[dairygirl4u2c]

I realize that Bush and Co. never said that Iraq and 911 were connected, but I think ya gotta read and listen to what is said carefully to realize that. If ya don't, you could very easily fall victim to the 70% of the population who thought there was a tie between Iraw and 911 (though this is true, the public may have been simply making their own deduction, not because of what someone deceived... or reading above statements, someone might argue that government construed them to believe what is wrong, without technically lying)

Edited April 18, 2006 by dairygirl4u2c

[KnightofChrist]

[quote name='dairygirl4u2c' post='952345' date='Apr 18 2006, 11:56 AM']
I realize that Bush and Co. never said that Iraq and 911 were connected, but I think ya gotta read and listen to what is said carefully to realize that. If ya don't, you could very easily fall victim to the 70% of the population who thought there was a tie between Iraw and 911 (though this is true, the public may have been simply making their own deduction, not because of what someone deceived... or reading above statements, someone might argue that government construed them to believe what is wrong, without technically lying)
[/quote]

So in other words 70% of Americans are to stupid to understand what Bush really said.... please... the reason tthe ppl where lead to believe there was a connection was because the way the press reported what Bush said... the press are the ones that said there was a connection not Bush... if 70% of ppl actally believe this is because the lib press has brainwashed them... if the press would report the truth and not the "truth" as they see it things would be different...