Peccator Posted March 16, 2006 Posted March 16, 2006 (edited) [quote name='Amator Veritatis' date='Mar 14 2006, 04:25 PM']I believe that is the safest route. If something has not been defined or restricted such that the faithful are formally forbidden from holding a position, then it is safest to adhere to the lasting tradition of the Church and teachings of the holy Fathers.[/quote]Indeed. I find it surprising that a great deal of catholics do not understand the doctrine of Papal Infallibility...as there seem to be a misunderstanding between Papal opinion and the Pope speak from the Chair of Peter as Universal Father of the Church (of which I only really know of it being done twice in history). [quote] I hope there was no criticism on my part directed toward you. I simply wished to articulate the traditional position as I understand it. [/quote]Not at all...I find this topic very interesting...and very controversial. Any subject in our post modern society which might appear to criticise the Jewish religion can be considered anti-Semitic... Go figure However if people look closely at the Traditional Catholic paradigm and at the doctrine of Dispensationalism its obvious which one is more racist I think we should address this topic in more depth...its obvious there is quite a deal of confusion regarding the topic. Are you game? Edited March 16, 2006 by Peccator
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now