Jump to content
Join our Facebook Group ×
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Which of the following do you perfer and think is better?  

21 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone going to respond? Oh, and by the way, the choice "Protestant Inclusive Bible" was meant to be "Protestant Inclusive Language Bible".

Extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Posted

basically i (like any trad) would chose the Clementine Vulgate.

Posted

#1 Protestants don't make bibles in Latin

#2 Inclusive Language has never been a latin language problem, because latin has a precise neutral gender

:wacko:

Extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Posted

[quote name='Aloysius' date='Apr 3 2006, 08:18 PM']#1 Protestants don't make bibles in Latin

#2 Inclusive Language has never been a latin language problem, because latin has a precise neutral gender

:wacko:
[right][snapback]934667[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

:lol_pound:

Posted (edited)

The Greek is better than both of them.

;)

Edited by Era Might
Posted

[quote]The Greek is better than both of them.[/quote]

no, the Clementine Vulgate is better than the Greek, Hebrew and all other languages combined! :P:

Posted

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Apr 3 2006, 09:34 PM']no, the Clementine Vulgate is better than the Greek, Hebrew and all other languages combined! :P:
[right][snapback]934738[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
How ya figure? :huh:

Brother Adam
Posted

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Apr 3 2006, 09:34 PM']no, the Clementine Vulgate is better than the Greek, Hebrew and all other languages combined! :P:
[right][snapback]934738[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

St. Paul?

Yes?

I'm sorry, but the language that the Holy Spirit is guiding you to write the Sacred Writ in is not good enough.

Says who?

A phatmasser.

A who?


--

Moses?

Yes?

...

Posted

Actually, I would consider myself more of a Fisheater than a Phatmasser, but I hold dual citizenship

Brother Adam
Posted

[url="http://vulsearch.sourceforge.net/gettext.html"]http://vulsearch.sourceforge.net/gettext.html[/url]

Brother Adam
Posted (edited)

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Apr 3 2006, 09:45 PM']Actually, I would consider myself more of a Fisheater than a Phatmasser, but I hold dual citizenship
[right][snapback]934755[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

regardless, the Bible was not penned in Latin. Jesus did not speak Latin. The early Church did not say mass in Latin, nor did they pray in Latin. Latin was the vulgar language that the Bible was translated to later on.

Edited by Brother Adam
Posted

[quote]regardless, the Bible was not penned in Latin. Jesus did not speak Latin. The early Church did not say mass in Latin, nor did they pray in Latin. Latin was the vulgar language that the Bible was translated to later on.[/quote]

Jesus was/is omnipotent, so of course he knew Latin and may have spoken it to the Roman dudes at during his Passion (as he did in the movie with the same name). The Church had switched to Latin by AD 300. Latin was one of the lauguages by Christ as he died, which sanctified it and made it non-vulgar.

Brother Adam
Posted (edited)

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Apr 3 2006, 10:03 PM']Jesus was/is omnipotent, so of course he knew Latin and may have spoken it to the Roman dudes at during his Passion (as he did in the movie with the same name). The Church had switched to Latin by AD 300. Latin was one of the lauguages by Christ as he died, which sanctified it and made it non-vulgar.
[right][snapback]934789[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

Do you know what a KJVO is?

Btw, vulgar means common. You know. Vulgate. :)

And did you see the link I gave you?

Don't say I ain't ever give folks in schism nothing, for those that are.

Edited by Brother Adam
Posted

I'm not in schism! I am not an any way, shape or form affiliated with the SSPX. Thnx for the link tho.

Brother Adam
Posted

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Apr 3 2006, 10:21 PM']I'm not in schism! I am not an any way, shape or form affiliated with the SSPX. Thnx for the link tho.
[right][snapback]934815[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

I didn't say you were. But there are some here who are.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

Why does Stthomasmore have the "hello I dont rep the church" sign but Eutychus doesnt? Another proof that protestant are being treated better than traditionalists. perhaps? I think someone might want to fix that.

Posted

[quote name='Akalyte' post='1076453' date='Sep 27 2006, 07:47 AM']
Why does Stthomasmore have the "hello I dont rep the church" sign but Eutychus doesnt? Another proof that protestant are being treated better than traditionalists. perhaps? I think someone might want to fix that.
[/quote]

Or perhaps dUSt just hasn't gotten around to the latest round of phishys......but it could be me...... :idontknow:

Posted

Yeah but I thought other moderators could fix those things? Stthomasmore says he's not schismatic, yet he is still "seperated brehren".

ok well sorry for the thread hijack.

I'll go with the newly, newly revised and revisable, new american liberal edition. lol

  • 3 months later...
Posted

how was this threads last post listed as Sep.27th?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...