Clementine Vulgate or New Vulgate?

[Resurrexi]

Vote!

[Resurrexi]

Anyone going to respond? Oh, and by the way, the choice "Protestant Inclusive Bible" was meant to be "Protestant Inclusive Language Bible".

[Extra ecclesiam nulla salus]

basically i (like any trad) would chose the Clementine Vulgate.

[Aloysius]

#1 Protestants don't make bibles in Latin

#2 Inclusive Language has never been a latin language problem, because latin has a precise neutral gender

[Extra ecclesiam nulla salus]

[quote name='Aloysius' date='Apr 3 2006, 08:18 PM']#1 Protestants don't make bibles in Latin

#2 Inclusive Language has never been a latin language problem, because latin has a precise neutral gender


[right][snapback]934667[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

[Era Might]

The Greek is better than both of them.

Edited April 4, 2006 by Era Might

[Resurrexi]

[quote]The Greek is better than both of them.[/quote]

no, the Clementine Vulgate is better than the Greek, Hebrew and all other languages combined! :

[Paladin]

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Apr 3 2006, 09:34 PM']no, the Clementine Vulgate is better than the Greek, Hebrew and all other languages combined! :
[right][snapback]934738[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
How ya figure?

[Brother Adam]

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Apr 3 2006, 09:34 PM']no, the Clementine Vulgate is better than the Greek, Hebrew and all other languages combined! :
[right][snapback]934738[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

St. Paul?

Yes?

I'm sorry, but the language that the Holy Spirit is guiding you to write the Sacred Writ in is not good enough.

Says who?

A phatmasser.

A who?


--

Moses?

Yes?

...

[Resurrexi]

Actually, I would consider myself more of a Fisheater than a Phatmasser, but I hold dual citizenship

[Brother Adam]

[url="http://vulsearch.sourceforge.net/gettext.html"]http://vulsearch.sourceforge.net/gettext.html[/url]

[Brother Adam]

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Apr 3 2006, 09:45 PM']Actually, I would consider myself more of a Fisheater than a Phatmasser, but I hold dual citizenship
[right][snapback]934755[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

regardless, the Bible was not penned in Latin. Jesus did not speak Latin. The early Church did not say mass in Latin, nor did they pray in Latin. Latin was the vulgar language that the Bible was translated to later on.

Edited April 4, 2006 by Brother Adam

[Resurrexi]

[quote]regardless, the Bible was not penned in Latin. Jesus did not speak Latin. The early Church did not say mass in Latin, nor did they pray in Latin. Latin was the vulgar language that the Bible was translated to later on.[/quote]

Jesus was/is omnipotent, so of course he knew Latin and may have spoken it to the Roman dudes at during his Passion (as he did in the movie with the same name). The Church had switched to Latin by AD 300. Latin was one of the lauguages by Christ as he died, which sanctified it and made it non-vulgar.

[Brother Adam]

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Apr 3 2006, 10:03 PM']Jesus was/is omnipotent, so of course he knew Latin and may have spoken it to the Roman dudes at during his Passion (as he did in the movie with the same name). The Church had switched to Latin by AD 300. Latin was one of the lauguages by Christ as he died, which sanctified it and made it non-vulgar.
[right][snapback]934789[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

Do you know what a KJVO is?

Btw, vulgar means common. You know. Vulgate.

And did you see the link I gave you?

Don't say I ain't ever give folks in schism nothing, for those that are.

Edited April 4, 2006 by Brother Adam

[Resurrexi]

I'm not in schism! I am not an any way, shape or form affiliated with the SSPX. Thnx for the link tho.