styx chyx Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 [quote]kinda like when UK sent all their prisoners to Australia except we will kill them so they cannot reproduce, sever the bloodline; it's the only way to be sure.[/quote] What you trying to say dude? That we're all crims??? :
toledo_jesus Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 [quote name='Sojourner' post='972854' date='May 5 2006, 09:13 PM'] So yeah, what do you think? Should public flogging be reinstituted? [/quote] yes. A man can keep his dignity through a flogging. [quote name='Era Might' post='975734' date='May 8 2006, 09:23 PM'] Flogging is barbaric. [/quote] also, effective at deterring criminal behavior. Added to that, it would save money and jail space for really hardened criminals. This extra space and money might encourage a relaxation of the death penalty. Flogging rules. [quote name='Tarcisius' post='975673' date='May 8 2006, 08:32 PM'] hey it doesnt even hurt that bad. [/quote] Yes, it totally hurts like crazy. A proper flogging doesn't involve a man and a stick just standing in one place. Over in Singapore, they take a bamboo rod and run AT the floggee, applying maximum force in a highly concentrated thin stripe. Major ouchies.
Era Might Posted May 13, 2006 Posted May 13, 2006 [quote name='toledo_jesus' post='980349' date='May 13 2006, 02:44 PM'] also, effective at deterring criminal behavior. Added to that, it would save money and jail space for really hardened criminals. This extra space and money might encourage a relaxation of the death penalty. [/quote] People usually don't think about consequences when they're committing a crime. Just a fact of human nature. Besides, just because something "works" doesn't mean it is just. But we've gone over that before. :
God the Father Posted May 14, 2006 Posted May 14, 2006 If the prospect of spending 5 years in a cell with a big man named Avocado doesn't deter crime, I fail to see how the prospect of a public flogging would.
toledo_jesus Posted May 15, 2006 Posted May 15, 2006 [quote name='Era Might' post='980375' date='May 13 2006, 04:18 PM'] People usually don't think about consequences when they're committing a crime. Just a fact of human nature. Besides, just because something "works" doesn't mean it is just. But we've gone over that before. : [/quote] well now let's see. we can't kill them, we can't deprive them of cable television, we can't put them in holes... just [i]what[/i] form of punishment would be just? I think flogging is visceral and violent, but non-fatal and sufficiently embarassing so as to make criminals think twice before they do something stupid. when a gangbanger is reduced to public whimpers for his crimes instead of doing a little time in the pokey so he can build up his rep, perhaps it'll make a difference in crime rates. Then, the fellas who don't respond well to flogging can take up residence at State Penal Apartments. [quote name='God the Father' post='980570' date='May 13 2006, 08:09 PM'] If the prospect of spending 5 years in a cell with a big man named Avocado doesn't deter crime, I fail to see how the prospect of a public flogging would. [/quote] nobody gets to see the tender moments you and Avocado would share...flogging would of necessity be made public.
Sojourner Posted November 8, 2006 Author Posted November 8, 2006 As a point of interest (probably to no one but me, but still) they're calling this guy the winner now.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now