musturde Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 My theo teacher has parents who are theo teachers ( i think both) so it's a good source... be happy I'm actually giving u proof that it's true, even though I personally don't think it is.
mulls Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 i guess it would be a pleasant surprise if you didn't believe in it, than all of a sudden were right in front of Jesus without having died, eh?
musturde Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 okay then I'll look it up a lil now then more later...
musturde Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 I wouldn't care if I didn't believe in it and it really happened. I'd be happier if it was a suprise :P
Circle_Master Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 exactly . and no, none that I know of teach if you don't believe it won't happen to you. It's taught that all saved christians are raptured at the same moment regardless of theology.
musturde Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 (edited) I read up on it something like that... maybe it's from some teachers and not all... Maybe the "Left Behind" creators? Edited January 18, 2004 by musturde
phatcatholic Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 musturde, maybe this article will help. if this doctrine is new to u, then feel free to read this article more than once (this can all seem a little confusing at first). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.catholic.com/library/Rapture.asp THE RAPTURE Are you Pre, Mid, or Post? If you don’t know how to answer that question, you’re probably a Catholic. Most Fundamentalists and Evangelicals know that these words are shorthand for the following Protestant terms: pre-tribulation, mid-tribulation, and post-tribulation. The terms all refer to when the rapture is supposed to occur. To understand what that means, you need a little background. The Millennium In Revelation 20:1–3, 7–8, we read, "Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding in his hand the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain. And he seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the Devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years, and threw him into the pit, and shut it and sealed it over him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years were ended. After that he must be loosed for a little while. . . . And when the thousand years are ended, Satan will be loosed from his prison and will come out to deceive the nations which are at the four corners of the earth." The period of a thousand years, the writer tells us, is the reign of Christ, and the thousand-year period is popularly called the millennium. The millennium is a harbinger of the end of the world, and Revelation 20 is interpreted in three ways by conservative Protestants. The three schools of thought are called postmillennialism, amillennialism, and premillennialism. Let’s take a look at them. Postmillennialism According to Loraine Boettner in his book The Millennium (he also wrote the seriously defective anti-Catholic book Roman Catholicism), postmillennialism is "that view of last things which holds that the kingdom of God is now being extended in the world through the preaching of the gospel and the saving work of the Holy Spirit, that the world eventually is to be Christianized, and that the return of Christ will occur at the close of a long period of righteousness and peace, commonly called the millennium." This view was popular with nineteenth-century Protestants, when progress was expected even in religion and before twentieth-century horrors were tasted. Today few hold to it, except such groups as Christian Reconstructionists, an outgrowth of the conservative Presbyterian movement. Commentators point out that postmillennialism is to be distinguished from the view of theological and secular liberals who envision social betterment and even the kingdom of God coming through purely natural, rather than supernatural, means. Postmillennialists, however, argue that man is incapable of building a paradise for himself; paradise will only come about by God’s grace. Postmillennialists also typically say that the millennium spoken of in Revelation 20 should be understood figuratively and that the phrase "a thousand years" refers not to a fixed period of ten centuries, but to an indefinitely long time. For example, Psalm 50:10 speaks of God’s sovereignty over all that is and tells us that God owns "the cattle on a thousand hills." This is not meant to be taken literally. At the millennium’s end will come the Second Coming, the general resurrection of the dead, and the last judgment. The problem with postmillennialism is that Scripture does not depict the world as experiencing a period of complete (or relatively complete) Christianization before the Second Coming. There are numerous passages that speak of the age between the First and Second Comings as a time of great sorrow and strife for Christians. One revealing passage is the parable of the wheat and the weeds (Matt. 13:24–30, 36–43). In this parable, Christ declares that the righteous and the wicked will both be planted and grow alongside each other in God’s field ("the field is the world," Matt. 13:38) until the end of the world, when they will be separated, judged, and either be thrown into the fire of hell or inherit God’s kingdom (Matt. 13:41–43). There is no biblical evidence that the world will eventually become totally (or even almost totally) Christian, but rather that there will always be a parallel development of the righteous and the wicked until the final judgment. Amillennialism The amillennial view interprets Revelation 20 symbolically and sees the millennium not as an earthly golden age in which the world will be totally Christianized, but as the present period of Christ’s rule in heaven and on the earth through his Church. This was the view of the Protestant Reformers and is still the most common view among traditional Protestants, though not among most of the newer Evangelical and Fundamentalist groups. Amillennialists also believe in the coexistence of good and evil on earth until the end. The tension that exists on earth between the righteous and the wicked will be resolved only by Christ’s return at the end of time. The golden age of the millennium is instead the heavenly reign of Christ with the saints, in which the Church on earth participates to some degree, though not in the glorious way it will at the Second Coming. Amillennialists point out that the thrones of the saints who reign with Christ during the millennium appear to be set in heaven (Rev. 20:4; cf. 4:4, 11:16) and that the text nowhere states that Christ is on earth during this reign with the saints. They explain that, although the world will never be fully Christianized until the Second Coming, the millennium does have effects on earth in that Satan is bound in such a way that he cannot deceive the nations by hindering the preaching of the gospel (Rev. 20:3). They point out that Jesus spoke of the necessity of "binding the strong man" (Satan) in order to plunder his house by rescuing people from his grip (Matt. 12:29). When the disciples returned from a tour of preaching the gospel, rejoicing at how demons were subject to them, Jesus declared, "I saw Satan fall like lightning" (Luke 10:18). Thus for the gospel to move forward at all in the world, it is necessary for Satan to be bound in one sense, even if he may still be active in attacking individuals (1 Pet. 5:8). The millennium is a golden age not when compared to the glories of the age to come, but in comparison to all prior ages of human history, in which the world was swallowed in pagan darkness. Today, a third of the human race is Christian and even more than that have repudiated pagan idols and embraced the worship of the God of Abraham. Premillennialism Third on the list is premillennialism, currently the most popular among Fundamentalists and Evangelicals (though a century ago amillennialism was). Most of the books written about the End Times, such as Hal Lindsey’s Late Great Planet Earth, are written from a premillennial perspective. Like postmillennialists, premillennialists believe that the thousand years is an earthly golden age during which the world will be thoroughly Christianized. Unlike postmillennialists, they believe that it will occur after the Second Coming rather than before, so that Christ reigns physically on earth during the millennium. They believe that the Final Judgment will occur only after the millennium is over (which many interpret to be an exactly one thousand year period). But Scripture does not support the idea of a thousand year span between the Second Coming and the Final Judgment. Christ declares, "For the Son of man is to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay every man for what he has done" (Matt. 16:27), and "[w]hen the Son of man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate them one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. . . . And they [the goats] will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life" (Matt. 25:31–32, 46). The Rapture Premillennialists often give much attention to the doctrine of the rapture. According to this doctrine, when Christ returns, all of the elect who have died will be raised and transformed into a glorious state, along with the living elect, and then be caught up to be with Christ. The key text referring to the rapture is 1 Thessalonians 4:16–17, which states, "For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the archangel’s call, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first; then we who are alive, who are left, shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and so we shall always be with the Lord." Premillennialists hold, as do virtually all Christians (except certain postmillennialists), that the Second Coming will be preceded by a time of great trouble and persecution of God’s people (2 Thess. 2:1–4). This period is often called the tribulation. Until the nineteenth century, all Christians agreed that the rapture—though it was not called that at the time—would occur immediately before the Second Coming, at the close of the period of persecution. This position is today called the "post-tribulational" view because it says the rapture will come after the tribulation. But in 1830, a Scottish visionary, who belonged to a sect known as the Irvingites, claimed while in a trance that the rapture would occur before the period of persecution. This position, now known as the "pre-tribulational" view, also was embraced by John Nelson Darby, an early leader of a Fundamentalist movement that became known as Dispensationalism. Darby’s pre-tribulational view of the rapture was then picked up by a man named C.I. Scofield, who taught the view in the footnotes of his Scofield Reference Bible, which was widely distributed in England and America. Many Protestants who read the Scofield Reference Bible uncritically accepted what its footnotes said and adopted the pre-tribulational view, even though no Christian had heard of it in the previous 1800 years of Church history. Eventually, a third position developed, known as the "mid-tribulational" view, which claims that the rapture will occur during the middle of the tribulation. Finally, a fourth view developed that claims that there will not be a single rapture where all believers are gathered to Christ, but that there will be a series of mini-raptures that occur at different times with respect to the tribulation. This confusion has caused the movement to split into bitterly opposed camps. The problem with all of the positions (except the historic, post-tribulational view, which was accepted by all Christians, including non-premillennialists) is that they split the Second Coming into different events. In the case of the pre-trib view, Christ is thought to have three comings—one when he was born in Bethlehem, one when he returns for the rapture at the tribulation’s beginning, and one at tribulation’s end, when he establishes the millennium. This three-comings view is foreign to Scripture. Problems with the pre-tribulational view are highlighted by Baptist (and premillennial) theologian Dale Moody, who wrote: "Belief in a pre-tribulational rapture . . . contradicts all three chapters in the New Testament that mention the tribulation and the rapture together (Mark 13:24–27; Matt. 24:26–31; 2 Thess. 2:1–12). . . . The theory is so biblically bankrupt that the usual defense is made using three passages that do not even mention a tribulation (John 14:3; 1 Thess. 4:17; 1 Cor. 15:52). These are important passages, but they have not had one word to say about a pre-tribulational rapture. The score is 3 to 0, three passages for a post-tribulational rapture and three that say nothing on the subject. . . . Pre-tribulationism is biblically bankrupt and does not know it" (The Word of Truth, 556–7). What’s the Catholic Position? As far as the millennium goes, we tend to agree with Augustine and, derivatively, with the amillennialists. The Catholic position has thus historically been "amillennial" (as has been the majority Christian position in general, including that of the Protestant Reformers), though Catholics do not typically use this term. The Church has rejected the premillennial position, sometimes called "millenarianism" (see the Catechism of the Catholic Church 676). In the 1940s the Holy Office judged that premillennialism "cannot safely be taught," though the Church has not dogmatically defined this issue. With respect to the rapture, Catholics certainly believe that the event of our gathering together to be with Christ will take place, though they do not generally use the word "rapture" to refer to this event (somewhat ironically, since the term "rapture" is derived from the text of the Latin Vulgate of 1 Thess. 4:17—"we will be caught up," [Latin: rapiemur]). Spinning Wheels? Many spend much time looking for signs in the heavens and in the headlines. This is especially true of premillennialists, who anxiously await the tribulation because it will inaugurate the rapture and millennium. A more balanced perspective is given by Peter, who writes, "But do not ignore this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slow about his promise as some count slowness, but is forbearing toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance. . . . Since all these things are thus to be dissolved, what sort of persons ought you to be in lives of holiness and godliness, waiting for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be kindled and dissolved, and the elements will melt with fire! But according to his promise we wait for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. Therefore, beloved, since you wait for these, be zealous to be found by him without spot or blemish, and at peace" (2 Pet. 3:8–14). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ i hope this helps. if u would like more info, just let me know, and i can provide links to more articles for you. pax christi, phatcatholic
Circle_Master Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 this could be useful as well for an overview of positions http://home.att.net/%7Enathan.wilson/eschtlgy.htm
musturde Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 (edited) This doctrine is not new for me... I'm about neutral on it ... I don't care about it... If there really were visions of it then I'm neutral... if there wasn't then I'm against it. If the Cath Church is against it, then I'm against it... but is it official? Edited January 18, 2004 by musturde
CatholicAndFanatical Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 I dont believe thats what John had in mind when he wrote these things he saw. Just like in Revelations when it said "100,000" enter heaven. Only 100,000 huh..I think the Mormons or JW think this literally. when we see Jesus coming from Heaven in all His glory and might. It will be the end of the world. He will judge the living and the dead. If I had to comment on the 1000 year reign of Satan that revelations talk about..I would say were in it now. Look around. Satan is everywhere, TV, Radio, magazines, internet, schools, hospitals, government. satan is getting God taken out of these places and he is being put in God's spot. Were in the 1000 year reign now. No one can doubt that satan has control for now. Grab your rosary beads yo, were goin into battle. :shield:
Dave Posted January 18, 2004 Posted January 18, 2004 This doctrine is not new for me... I'm about neutral on it ... I don't care about it... If there really were visions of it then I'm neutral... if there wasn't then I'm against it. If the Cath Church is against it, then I'm against it... but is it official? Yes, it's official. The doctrine of the rapture is indeed condemned by the Catholic Church.
Anna Posted January 18, 2004 Author Posted January 18, 2004 Correct! It's one of the hugest Bible misinterpretations out there, I think! Jesus will only come a second time when He comes to judge the saved and the damned; the living and the dead. He's not coming back to rapture peeps up before the tribulation. Hey, if the Apostles, saints, and martyrs had to suffer, who are we to think we get a free ticket and are assumed bodily into heaven? Yet, these same peeps who think they're going to be "raptured," or taken up, would deny that God's Mother could've been assumed into heaven, right? ;)
phatcatholic Posted January 19, 2004 Posted January 19, 2004 Yet, these same peeps who think they're going to be "raptured," or taken up, would deny that God's Mother could've been assumed into heaven, right? hehe, good point! that never dawned on me before. also, more articles for musturde: --LaHaying the Rapture on Thick (confusing title, huh?) --Recycled Rapture --Now You See 'Em, Now You Don't: Dispensing With the Rapture --Millenialism (Rapture): Apocalypse Not Now hope this helps :D (as this becomes more popular, it becomes more necessary to have a specific view on the matter, instead of the neutral stance) pax christi, phatcatholic
Anna Posted January 19, 2004 Author Posted January 19, 2004 O my goodness, the titles alone have me ! Are the articles written as tongue in cheek as the catchy titles? (LaHaying it on thick, I think, is my fav.!) Pax Christi. <><
Birgitta Noel Posted January 20, 2004 Posted January 20, 2004 The other day the hubby and I were talking about those 100,000 people that some believe will be saved and he said that we might as well give up then since he was sure the quota was full. LOL, good thing I wasn't driving, I might have driven off the road! :surrender:
CatholicAndFanatical Posted January 20, 2004 Posted January 20, 2004 we might as well give up then since he was sure the quota was full lol I agree I think its the Joheva's Witness's that take this number literally I mean come on..if there was only room for 100,000 people in Heaven, do you really think it is wise to go door to door telling people about it? Heck no, Id be keeping that a secret. My momma didnt raise no fool.
Lil Red Posted January 20, 2004 Posted January 20, 2004 My momma didnt raise no fool. :rolling: :rolling: :rolling: :rolling: :rolling: :rolling:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now