Anna Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 Do we have to keep putting up with Larry's trash? Honestly, all he does is bash the Church with worthless tripe. It's rather sickening, not worth debating. Even when proven wrong, he pays no attention. He's convinced we're all evil unbaptized, water dipped heathen who adore clay statues. He won't listen to reason, just keeps posting the same garbage. Why is he here? Not to honestly dialogue, not to honestly debate, just to pound his jack chick type Scripture twisted lies into as many threads as possible. Why doesn't someone ban this person??????????????????????????????????????????????? Pax Christi. <><
Aloysius Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 all i can say is, how can someone truly be so naive as to think that was going to convince us of anything. you didn't give any evidence, no proof, just the opinion of ONE MAN, the opinion of Larry. and we give you the opinion of the EARLY CHURCH, the opinion of the CATHOLIC CHURCH NOW, the opinion of the CHURCH THROUGH THE AGES, and we show you where in the Bible this is prefigured, in Daniel. we provide evidence, you provide opinions. and may i inquire, no offense intended, as to why you type english in such a way that it is very hard to understand? you teach your man-made interpretation as if it were truth, we teach an interpretation which appears manmade, but it is made by the men who compiled the Bible. isn't THAT interpretation just a tad more credible? :huh:
Dave Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 all i can say is, how can someone truly be so naive as to think that was going to convince us of anything. you didn't give any evidence, no proof, just the opinion of ONE MAN, the opinion of Larry. and we give you the opinion of the EARLY CHURCH, the opinion of the CATHOLIC CHURCH NOW, the opinion of the CHURCH THROUGH THE AGES, and we show you where in the Bible this is prefigured, in Daniel. we provide evidence, you provide opinions. and may i inquire, no offense intended, as to why you type english in such a way that it is very hard to understand? you teach your man-made interpretation as if it were truth, we teach an interpretation which appears manmade, but it is made by the men who compiled the Bible. isn't THAT interpretation just a tad more credible? *gives Al a high five*
jmjtina Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 The Church is not the Whore of babylon. So why is the Bride maligned as the Whore? Jesus himself answered the question: "If they have called the master of the house Beelzebul, how much more will they malign those of his household" (Matt. 10:25). "If the world hates you, know that it has hated me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world . . . the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will persecute you" (John 15:18–20).
Aloysius Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 nm So why is the Bride maligned as the Whore? Jesus himself answered the question: "If they have called the master of the house Beelzebul, how much more will they malign those of his household" (Matt. 10:25). "If the world hates you, know that it has hated me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world . . . the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will persecute you" (John 15:18–20). :gives tina a high five: :D :cool:
Laudate_Dominum Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 "Gives Larry a high five" I like Truth and don't think he should be banned. I actually think he is going to be a good Catholic someday.
Aloysius Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 :huh: ... oh i see! subliminal messages!!! :D :cyclops:
jmjtina Posted January 24, 2004 Posted January 24, 2004 Truth Geography lesson: The Vatican is located on a hill, but not one of the seven. This has been the seat of the Church for some time, Vatican city (not always called that). Very good point made.
M.SIGGA Posted January 26, 2004 Posted January 26, 2004 You don't have a clue. ha ive been out of town for the past few days so please refute me oh master of the truth. I proved the "truth" wrong on another thread about baptism that you refused to respond to and now this one. change your name PLEASE!!! .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now