'new World Order' To Fight Global Warming

[Urib2007]

[b][color="#000000"][size=3]Brown wants 'new world order' to fight global warming
[/size][/color][/b]

Mon Mar 12, 4:20 AM ET

[b]LONDON (AFP)[/b] - Gordon Brown, likely to be the next prime minister, [size=2][b]will deliver a speech calling for a "new world order" to combat global warming on Monday.
[/b][/size]
According to excerpts released by the finance ministry, Chancellor of the Exchequer Brown will also say the United Nations should make the fight against global warming a core "pillar" of its international mission.

[img]http://www.cod-crusaders.org.uk/images/gordon_brown.jpg[/img]

Brown will praise the European Union's progress in combatting climate change after EU leaders on Friday agreed to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide by 20 percent by 2020, compared to 1990 levels.

He is set to announce domestic policy proposals that are targetted at helping Britons save energy, thereby cutting their individual carbon emissions, ahead of the government's publication of its Climate Change Bill on Tuesday.

"People want to make the right choices and they want help to take the right decisions," Brown will say.

"Government must provide practical help with, wherever possible, incentives in preference to penalties."

Brown is the favourite to be Britain's next prime minister, as Tony Blair has pledged to step down by September.

[Urib2007]

For those of you who don't know what a New World Order is, here's a quote that summarizes it well by Dr. John Coleman.

[b][color="#8B0000"]"A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited."[/color][/b]

[cmotherofpirl]

Who is Coleman and what are his credentials, and what makes this a definative definition over any other ones out there?
THe article you posted doesn't say one world government it says one world order which is not the same thing.

[Urib2007]

[quote name='cmotherofpirl' post='1212608' date='Mar 12 2007, 12:54 PM']Who is Coleman and what are his credentials, and what makes this a definative definition over any other ones out there?
THe article you posted doesn't say one world government it says one world order which is not the same thing.[/quote]

Why don't you google "New World Order" and see what it says. A NWO is a One World Government. Regarding credentials, did God's messengers have "credentials?" As far as I know they were fisherman and the Lord Jesus was a Carpenter. After all, God used a donkey to convey His message. It seems most of the people on this forum are obsessed with credentials much like the Pharisees were. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to do research on the New World Order. All you have to know how to do is read and have a brain.

Anyway, Dr. Coleman used to be a former British Intelligence Officer in MI6 and has published 12 major books and hundreds of Monographs. He's also a constitutional scholar, British Museum Researcher, Political Scientist, Historian, Middle East Specialist, Lecturer and Radio Talk Show Guest Speaker. By the sounds of it, he's got a pretty impressive resume if you ask me. Hopefully this satisfies all those who "must know about credentials" first.

[cmotherofpirl]

I have been reading about "new world order" since I read [b]1984[/b] in grade school.

Asking about credentials doesn't make one a pharisee, its about being cautious and prudent in one's judgement.
Look at Bishop Spong for example: one would assume by reading he is an Anglican Bishop that he was a christian.

[prose]

Just because someone uses the term "New World Order" doesn't mean that they are referring to your great conspiracy.

And Cmom, I like your avatar!

[Urib2007]

[font="Century Gothic"]If you ladies and gentlemen have some free time, you should check out this video on Google Video. It was aired on TV in the UK and is very insightful regarding how the whole global warming issue isn't our fault at all and there is nothing we can do to prevent it. [/font]

[img]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2007/02/02/nclim02.jpg[/img]

[url="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9005566792811497638"]The Global Warming Swindle[/url]

Edited March 12, 2007 by Urib2007

[FullTruth]

If anybody wants my two cents here, I think Global warming is a great threat that the elite is using.

They have created the problem by creating the industrial engine that is destroying our planet, and soon they will 'cull' human beings beecause we're too much of a cancer on the planet.

Fortunately, the tables will be turned on them soon, and it won't be humanity who is culled, but the Serpent and his seed. To all those pesky nephilim who might be reading this, yes, I am here to tell you your kingdom is coming to an end soon, nuff said!

[Fixxxer]

How could brown have anything to do with NWO anyway? the NWO was and always will be hulk hogan, kevin nash and scott hall! And yes, global warming is pretty much our fault. Who else other than the millions of people driving cars and other gases help warm up the earth? Oh right...its all a conspiracy from the goverment, almost forgot to turn on my brain washed mode.

Edited March 13, 2007 by Fixxxer

[jeffpugh]

[quote name='FullTruth' post='1212817' date='Mar 12 2007, 09:54 PM']If anybody wants my two cents here, I think Global warming is a great threat that the elite is using.

They have created the problem by creating the industrial engine that is destroying our planet, and soon they will 'cull' human beings beecause we're too much of a cancer on the planet.

Fortunately, the tables will be turned on them soon, and it won't be humanity who is culled, but the Serpent and his seed. To all those pesky nephilim who might be reading this, yes, I am here to tell you your kingdom is coming to an end soon, nuff said![/quote]

Yeah it seems that people take the road of humanity being the cancer of the planet... "too many children... lets lower birth rates to save the trees!"... This sinister machine that is our economy is based upon greed and trying to fill the emptiness that only God fills. Trying to fill it with money is like trying to fill the Grand Canyon with marbles. Any idea how many marbles are required? That is my point. It is impossible for us to imagine/do. We can rise up by proclaiming Christ and leading in spiritual cleansing as well as earthly cleansing. Stop supporting corporation giants if you can and stand up for God in the society. I know many of you are doing the latter... there is a link between all of this.. and it's not the founding of the new world order... its the deception of the Devil and the fall of our human order into Chaos: of pride, lust and blindness.

That's my 0.02 Canadian cents. (and slightly fire and brimstone speech)

Edited March 13, 2007 by Sacred Music Man

[Urib2007]

[quote name='Urib2007' post='1212602' date='Mar 12 2007, 12:45 PM']For those of you who don't know what a New World Order is, here's a quote that summarizes it well by Dr. John Coleman.

[b][color="#8B0000"]"A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

[b] There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. [/b]All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited."[/color][/b][/quote]

[b][size=3]America has poor excuse for poverty
[/size][/b]
February 27, 2007
BY JESSE JACKSON
[i]Chicago Sun-Times[/i]

[color="#000000"]We glimpsed misery in America during Katrina, as the poor were stranded in the storm. But those shocking pictures were misleading. America has a growing poverty problem, but it doesn't look like New Orleans.
Most poor people are not black or brown. Most poor people are white. They are disproportionately young, female and single. Most of them are not on welfare. They work every day that they can -- but they still cannot lift their families out of poverty.

An analysis of 2005 census figures by Tony Pugh for McClatchy Newspapers revealed almost 16 million Americans living in "deep or severe poverty," with the percentage of the poor living in severe poverty reaching a 32-year high. Our rich are getting richer and our poor, poorer.

Severe poverty is defined as half the federal poverty line, or an annual income of less than about $10,000 for a family of four, and about $5,000 for an individual. With food stamps, tax credits and food and clothing banks, the extremely poor can survive -- but not much more than that.

Poverty is not a popular subject in American politics these days. Both Democrats and Republicans appeal to the plight of the middle class, where the great bulk of voters reside. Republicans offer them tax cuts; Democrats offer help on kitchen table concerns -- health care, retirement security, educating their children. Small middle-class tax cuts were used to cover the massive Bush giveaways to the wealthy in his tax plan. Mortgage deductions for middle-income and wealthy donors cost the government far more than subsidies or vouchers for housing the poor.

[b]America is said to be suffering from poverty fatigue.[/b] Reagan's "welfare queen" has been supplanted by the "illegal immigrant" supposedly living on the dole, avoiding taxes and consuming services. When John Edwards made poverty a centerpiece of his presidential campaign -- opening it in New Orleans -- most political pundits thought he was making a mistake. Americans, they believe, are too hard-pressed to have much patience with a politician saying that we must do more to lift up the poor, or to give every child a fair and healthy start.

The result is unconscionable. [b]America ranks at or near the bottom of 31[/b] industrial nations for poverty and childhood poverty, according to the Luxembourg Income Study cited by Pugh. The numbers will surprise even those who work in America's cities. Research by University of Wisconsin professor Mark Rank concludes that a majority of Americans -- 58 percent -- between the ages of 20 and 75 will spend at least one year in poverty. A full year in extreme poverty will afflict one in three Americans in his or her adult life. These estimates apply only to native-born Americans. The numbers would be worse if undocumented workers were factored in.

We spend a smaller percentage of our resources on federal anti-poverty programs than other industrial nations. Only Russia and Mexico do a worse job of reducing poverty through government intervention.

Americans are a generous, not a mean, people. We support private charities, particularly in the wake of human catastrophes like Hurricane Katrina. But this conservative era has taught many to disdain government and to be suspicious of any program of support for the poor. Somehow the billion-dollar subsidies to big oil companies enjoying record profits do not generate the anger that is sparked by programs to lift poor mothers and children out of poverty.

Racial divides no doubt play a part. In Sweden or Finland, the poor are not distinguished by color or race. It is easier, perhaps, for citizens of those countries to think that there, but for the grace of God, go I. In the United States, most poor people are white, but most images and reporting on the poor centers on black and brown people in our inner cities. It is easier to think these people are undeserving, alien and unworthy of support.

So the numbers of the desperately poor grow, the level of support declines, and the gulf between rich and poor yawns ever wider. We are a better country than that. Or at least we'd like to think so.



[/color]

[Fixxxer]

that dosent exactly tie into global warming.

[cmotherofpirl]

[quote name='Urib2007' post='1213381' date='Mar 14 2007, 03:45 AM'][b][size=3]America has poor excuse for poverty
[/size][/b]
February 27, 2007
BY JESSE JACKSON
[i]Chicago Sun-Times[/i]

[color="#000000"]We glimpsed misery in America during Katrina, as the poor were stranded in the storm. But those shocking pictures were misleading. America has a growing poverty problem, but it doesn't look like New Orleans.
Most poor people are not black or brown. Most poor people are white. They are disproportionately young, female and single. Most of them are not on welfare. They work every day that they can -- but they still cannot lift their families out of poverty.

An analysis of 2005 census figures by Tony Pugh for McClatchy Newspapers revealed almost 16 million Americans living in "deep or severe poverty," with the percentage of the poor living in severe poverty reaching a 32-year high. Our rich are getting richer and our poor, poorer.

Severe poverty is defined as half the federal poverty line, or an annual income of less than about $10,000 for a family of four, and about $5,000 for an individual. With food stamps, tax credits and food and clothing banks, the extremely poor can survive -- but not much more than that.

Poverty is not a popular subject in American politics these days. Both Democrats and Republicans appeal to the plight of the middle class, where the great bulk of voters reside. Republicans offer them tax cuts; Democrats offer help on kitchen table concerns -- health care, retirement security, educating their children. Small middle-class tax cuts were used to cover the massive Bush giveaways to the wealthy in his tax plan. Mortgage deductions for middle-income and wealthy donors cost the government far more than subsidies or vouchers for housing the poor.

[b]America is said to be suffering from poverty fatigue.[/b] Reagan's "welfare queen" has been supplanted by the "illegal immigrant" supposedly living on the dole, avoiding taxes and consuming services. When John Edwards made poverty a centerpiece of his presidential campaign -- opening it in New Orleans -- most political pundits thought he was making a mistake. Americans, they believe, are too hard-pressed to have much patience with a politician saying that we must do more to lift up the poor, or to give every child a fair and healthy start.

The result is unconscionable. [b]America ranks at or near the bottom of 31[/b] industrial nations for poverty and childhood poverty, according to the Luxembourg Income Study cited by Pugh. The numbers will surprise even those who work in America's cities. Research by University of Wisconsin professor Mark Rank concludes that a majority of Americans -- 58 percent -- between the ages of 20 and 75 will spend at least one year in poverty. A full year in extreme poverty will afflict one in three Americans in his or her adult life. These estimates apply only to native-born Americans. The numbers would be worse if undocumented workers were factored in.

We spend a smaller percentage of our resources on federal anti-poverty programs than other industrial nations. Only Russia and Mexico do a worse job of reducing poverty through government intervention.

Americans are a generous, not a mean, people. We support private charities, particularly in the wake of human catastrophes like Hurricane Katrina. But this conservative era has taught many to disdain government and to be suspicious of any program of support for the poor. Somehow the billion-dollar subsidies to big oil companies enjoying record profits do not generate the anger that is sparked by programs to lift poor mothers and children out of poverty.

Racial divides no doubt play a part. In Sweden or Finland, the poor are not distinguished by color or race. It is easier, perhaps, for citizens of those countries to think that there, but for the grace of God, go I. In the United States, most poor people are white, but most images and reporting on the poor centers on black and brown people in our inner cities. It is easier to think these people are undeserving, alien and unworthy of support.

So the numbers of the desperately poor grow, the level of support declines, and the gulf between rich and poor yawns ever wider. We are a better country than that. Or at least we'd like to think so.
[/color][/quote]
Do not hijack this thread on global warming, start a new thread.