Four-year-olds Will Get Gay Fairytales At School

[jmjtina]

dairygirl, you sound like the mean junior high girl pouting in the corner saying, "That's what you get." I think we've defended our position pretty well, and your position has always been built and re-built on sand. So the children are the victims and they will be the ones being directly harmed, and our stance is to protect them, first and foremost. Because you believe otherwise, is not the point.

Truth is objective, not subjective.

If you can't understand that, than I suggest you open another thread and start discussing it again.

[hoosieranna]

[quote name='cmotherofpirl' post='1212671' date='Mar 12 2007, 05:45 PM']I suppose relgious schools will have to either sue or go out of business in the UK now.[/quote]

No official separation of church and state in the UK, from what I remember. Resident Brits, please correct me if I'm wrong!

Edited March 18, 2007 by Nadezhda

[dairygirl4u2c]

i admit i change my positions. they evolve. just because i don't take firm simple definitive stances doesn't mean i'm not on the right track. anyone can take the status quo conservative or liberal stance and run with it. my approach reminds me of the democratic party, not that i'm necessarily democrat. people think the democrats are washed up because they have no firm stances, other than the official formal party line. i say good if they don't as a whole. that means they are thinking for themselves. when people start thinking like sheep, and enough can form a party out of it, ie the republican party members who follow the line, then things start getting bad. if you can tell what someone believes by looking at fox news or rush limbaugh or reading a republican pamplet, there's something wrong. there are democrats who are sheep too, of course, but i don't think there's as many. of course, what the liberal side lacks in sheep, it makes up for in directionless baseless members wihtout much substance.

[Socrates]

[quote name='dairygirl4u2c' post='1215452' date='Mar 18 2007, 11:07 AM']when people start thinking like sheep, and enough can form a party out of it, ie the republican party members who follow the line, then things start getting bad. if you can tell what someone believes by looking at fox news or rush limbaugh or reading a republican pamplet, there's something wrong. there are democrats who are sheep too, of course, but i don't think there's as many. of course, what the liberal side lacks in sheep, it makes up for in directionless baseless members wihtout much substance.[/quote]
I'd say if anything, liberal Democrats tend to be more sheep than do Republicans or conservatives, but we all have our biases. Liberalism seems to have largely devolved into simplistic Bush-hatred, combined with socialism and promotion of abortion, homosexuality, etc. (i.e. - the whole "sexual revolution").

I think we all tend to be more aware of conflicts and divisions on our own side of the political fence - for instance I am more aware of the often-fierce conflicts on the Right: neo-cons vs. paleo-cons, traditionalists vs libertarians, etc.
The idea of conservatives as a bunch of conformist zombies who all mindlessly take their marching orders from George Bush and FOX News is a false one spread by liberals. (Even the "mainstream" liberal media has reported on the deepening rifts involving conservatives and the Republican party.)

[reelguy227]

I'm sorry...but four year olds??? That's just wrong!