StColette Posted July 19, 2007 Posted July 19, 2007 [quote name='gamesfanatic04' post='1332407' date='Jul 17 2007, 12:18 PM']Hey I can finally post! I find the best rule of thumb with mortal sins is if you have to ask then yes.[/quote] Umm no... Especially if one suffers from a scrupulous conscience and is constantly asking if everything is a sin. Mortal sin requires foreknowledge that what you are about to do or have done is sinful. Like... you know premarital sex is a sin and you do it any... that's a mortal sin!
93 Phillies Posted July 20, 2007 Posted July 20, 2007 So are you held fully responsible for things you do when drunk? I think you should be. Unless someone poisoned you or something obviously. But I mean, if you are drinking, you need to control yourself and accept responsibility completely. You are knowingly placing yourself in a spot of lowered inhibitions.
XIX Posted July 20, 2007 Posted July 20, 2007 Yes that's exactly it. If you get yourself drunk, you are putting yourself in a position to make bad choices.
XIX Posted July 20, 2007 Posted July 20, 2007 (edited) [quote name='gamesfanatic04' post='1332407' date='Jul 17 2007, 12:18 PM']Hey I can finally post! I find the best rule of thumb with mortal sins is if you have to ask then yes.[/quote] I could see how that can work for some people. I'd even go so far as to say that skipping communion at Mass may be a good idea if you have to ask, just to err on the side of caution. But normally, if you have to ask then you don't theoretically "know" that it's mortal. And knowing that a sin is grave matter is a requirement for a sin to be mortal. Anyways, here is the rundown: 1) [b]A sin has to be considered "grave matter" for it to be considered mortal.[/b] A lot of people ask "is such-and-such a mortal sin?" when I think they really mean to ask if it is a grave sin. In theory, any "mortal" sin could be a venial sin if requirements #2 and 3 are not met. 2) [b]You have to have full knowledge that what you are doing is wrong.[/b] Willful ignorance does not cover you here. Other than that, it a bit gray as far as what constitutes "willful ignorance." 3) [b]You have to have full consent of will. [/b] Again, it's kind of a gray area beyond the obvious (if someone is torturing you or threatening your life, you don't have full consent of will). Stuff like addiction could be considered an imposement on full consent of will, but that's kind of a gray area--at least in my mind. If someone wants to try to clarify that area, go for it With all of that said, I do think that many Catholics (myself included) focus so much on avoiding mortal sin that we forget about what is truly important to avoid mortal sin in the first place--that is, focusing on God and holiness. Trying to avoid mortal sin is fine and good, but when it becomes the main goal, it seems analogous to aiming for purgatory. "Dear Lord, please let me do just good enough to get out of Hell." I think the Lord wants more from us. Edited July 20, 2007 by XIX
T-Bone _ Posted July 20, 2007 Posted July 20, 2007 [quote name='XIX' post='1335662' date='Jul 20 2007, 09:12 AM']I could see how that can work for some people. I'd even go so far as to say that skipping communion at Mass may be a good idea if you have to ask, just to err on the side of caution. But normally, if you have to ask then you don't theoretically "know" that it's mortal. And knowing that a sin is grave matter is a requirement for a sin to be mortal. Anyways, here is the rundown: 1) [b]A sin has to be considered "grave matter" for it to be considered mortal.[/b] A lot of people ask "is such-and-such a mortal sin?" when I think they really mean to ask if it is a grave sin. In theory, any "mortal" sin could be a venial sin if requirements #2 and 3 are not met. 2) [b]You have to have full knowledge that what you are doing is wrong.[/b] Willful ignorance does not cover you here. Other than that, it a bit gray as far as what constitutes "willful ignorance." 3) You have to have full consent of will. Again, it's kind of a gray area beyond the obvious (if someone is torturing you or threatening your life, you don't have full consent of will). Stuff like addiction could be considered an imposement on full consent of will, but that's kind of a gray area--at least in my mind. If someone wants to try to clarify that area, go for it [/quote] That pretty much covers it.
Sojourner Posted July 20, 2007 Posted July 20, 2007 [quote name='93 Phillies' post='1335526' date='Jul 20 2007, 01:55 AM']So are you held fully responsible for things you do when drunk? I think you should be. Unless someone poisoned you or something obviously. But I mean, if you are drinking, you need to control yourself and accept responsibility completely. You are knowingly placing yourself in a spot of lowered inhibitions.[/quote] This is true legally as well, generally. Even though drinking reduces the "knowing" part of your culpability the choice to get drink was knowing and voluntary.
bonoducchi Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 It's mortal because you look ridiculous and make other people around you physically ill.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now