Should Catholics Attend Ecumenical Bible Study Groups?

[JustaServant]

[quote name='Majella' post='1677115' date='Oct 14 2008, 02:57 AM']NO;NO;NO;!

It is hard enough to keep thye faith without compromising with protestants; try to keep the faith ; don't COMPROMISE!!!!!!!
Don't mix with protestants!!! (an ex-protestant!)[/quote]
Hello.
I don't post here much (I'll try to change that). I am a former fundamentalist Baptist preacher who returned to the Catholic Church last year. Your words remind me of the same words I heard out of the mouth of a rabid anti-Catholic fundamentalist preacher:
[quote]“Ignoring their lost state, being tolerant of their false doctrine, and [b][u]pretending they are one of us [/u][/b]is not going to help them get saved.”[/quote]

True, Catholics need to be strong enough in the faith so as not to be led astray by false doctrine. In fact the ones that are led astray are usually people who know little of their own Catholic faith.
However your choice of words, "mix with Protestants" sounds angry and bitter. Not all Protestants are anti-Catholic. Your words sound very much like the fundamentalists I once walked among. They called it 'separation'. Let me just quote from my blog:
If one believes that he or she has experienced what no other has (being “born again”), and possesses what others other than them could not possibly have (the Holy Spirit), it creates an elitist world-view that allows only those to whom we agree with, to enter.
Over the years I have heard “that person is now a (insert opposition group here), so I had to ’break fellowship’ with them” This is the fundamentalist doctrine of “separation”. A superior, elitist attitude of belonging to a privileged group. Those who do not belong to the group are called “unrepentant brothers and false teachers”
The problem is, that encompasses quite a population if one takes that to its logical conclusion. This encompasses people far beyond hated Catholics and liberals. It also includes people within their own ‘circle’ with whom they disagree. To belong to this ever shrinking circle becomes the object they strive for.
In rationalizing that Christians who don’t agree with you are all “compromisers,” they assume that is the indicator of true spirituality.
They truly believe they are superior. This theological “rigidity” is more important than all other factors. And sadly, there is a trail of broken relationships in their past that is blamed on the actions of the people they “separated” from. Tragically, these broken relationships include family members and former friends.
This completely went against how I was raised by my parents. We did not abandon family and friends based on disagreements or world-view. Jesus taught us to love one another, not to pick and choose whom we love.
I believe one of the reasons fundamental Baptists think this way has to do with living in a fantasy world of their own making. They look to a reality that never existed, and hope for a Utopia that never will exist. When struck by the fact that it does not, it destroys their illusions and they lapse into cynicism and depression. They deal with this by altering reality through 'separation' from whatever or whoever is not like themselves and an end-times fairy tale which allows them to press on in world that does not accept them.
“Fellowshipping” with a group who truly believe they are better than others can be a surreal experience. It leads logically to exclusion based on reasons that hardly fit into their “Biblical world-view”. Many times it is based on race, class, education, and sex.
The sad part is, the longer one “fellowships” with fundamentalists, “separation” from them becomes a relief.

Catholics are not like this at all.

[cmotherofpirl]

Most bible studying groups explicitly state that they consider the Bible their SOLE rule of faith, purposely excludung the role of the Church, and are therefore not appropriate for Catholics.

[rhetoricfemme]

[quote name='JustaServant' post='1679854' date='Oct 17 2008, 11:59 AM']True, Catholics need to be strong enough in the faith so as not to be led astray by false doctrine. In fact the ones that are led astray are usually people who know little of their own Catholic faith.
However your choice of words, "mix with Protestants" sounds angry and bitter. Not all Protestants are anti-Catholic. Your words sound very much like the fundamentalists I once walked among. They called it 'separation'. Let me just quote from my blog:
If one believes that he or she has experienced what no other has (being “born again”), and possesses what others other than them could not possibly have (the Holy Spirit), it creates an elitist world-view that allows only those to whom we agree with, to enter.
Over the years I have heard “that person is now a (insert opposition group here), so I had to ’break fellowship’ with them” This is the fundamentalist doctrine of “separation”. A superior, elitist attitude of belonging to a privileged group. Those who do not belong to the group are called “unrepentant brothers and false teachers”
The problem is, that encompasses quite a population if one takes that to its logical conclusion. This encompasses people far beyond hated Catholics and liberals. It also includes people within their own ‘circle’ with whom they disagree. To belong to this ever shrinking circle becomes the object they strive for.
In rationalizing that Christians who don’t agree with you are all “compromisers,” they assume that is the indicator of true spirituality.
They truly believe they are superior. This theological “rigidity” is more important than all other factors. And sadly, there is a trail of broken relationships in their past that is blamed on the actions of the people they “separated” from. Tragically, these broken relationships include family members and former friends.
This completely went against how I was raised by my parents. We did not abandon family and friends based on disagreements or world-view. Jesus taught us to love one another, not to pick and choose whom we love.
I believe one of the reasons fundamental Baptists think this way has to do with living in a fantasy world of their own making. They look to a reality that never existed, and hope for a Utopia that never will exist. When struck by the fact that it does not, it destroys their illusions and they lapse into cynicism and depression. They deal with this by altering reality through 'separation' from whatever or whoever is not like themselves and an end-times fairy tale which allows them to press on in world that does not accept them.
“Fellowshipping” with a group who truly believe they are better than others can be a surreal experience. It leads logically to exclusion based on reasons that hardly fit into their “Biblical world-view”. Many times it is based on race, class, education, and sex.
The sad part is, the longer one “fellowships” with fundamentalists, “separation” from them becomes a relief.

Catholics are not like this at all.[/quote]

I, like... Need to make a poster out of this. Similar to text-heavy posters with inspirational sunsets for backgrounds. Only this is way better and actually important for people to hear!

Thank you.

[LouisvilleFan]

[quote name='cmotherofpirl' post='1680116' date='Oct 17 2008, 08:58 PM']Most bible studying groups explicitly state that they consider the Bible their SOLE rule of faith, purposely excludung the role of the Church, and are therefore not appropriate for Catholics.[/quote]

If it's truly an ecumenical Bible study, then they won't carry such a stipulation. Of course, always depends on the individuals involved and how cooperative they are. InterVarsity Christian Fellowship is one example of an evangelical campus organization that's truly ecumenical; their statement of faith doesn't claim the Sola Scriptura doctrine.

Not only that, but at their Urbana missions conference, which brings about 20,000 students from across the country every four years in St. Louis (used to be in Urbana, IL, hence the name), they even have Catholic priests who offer Holy Communion to Catholics who are in attendance. Not many evangelical groups are that accommodating

[Archaeology cat]

[quote name='LouisvilleFan' post='1680716' date='Oct 18 2008, 09:34 PM']If it's truly an ecumenical Bible study, then they won't carry such a stipulation. Of course, always depends on the individuals involved and how cooperative they are. InterVarsity Christian Fellowship is one example of an evangelical campus organization that's truly ecumenical; their statement of faith doesn't claim the Sola Scriptura doctrine.

Not only that, but at their Urbana missions conference, which brings about 20,000 students from across the country every four years in St. Louis (used to be in Urbana, IL, hence the name), they even have Catholic priests who offer Holy Communion to Catholics who are in attendance. Not many evangelical groups are that accommodating [/quote]
I didn't realise that they did that at Urbana. One of my roommies went there at least once. I liked InterVarsity, when I was involved with them (back when I was still Baptist, actually).

[LouisvilleFan]

[quote name='Archaeology cat' post='1680719' date='Oct 18 2008, 05:41 PM']I didn't realise that they did that at Urbana. One of my roommies went there at least once. I liked InterVarsity, when I was involved with them (back when I was still Baptist, actually).[/quote]

I went in 1999 or 2000, when it was still in Urbana. Funny thing is, I didn't know they offered the Eucharist either. My best friend from college, who is Baptist, told me they had priests there. Somehow I never noticed... shows how aloof I can be sometimes.

[tinytherese]

My college does have an intervarsity organization on campus. I was once asked by one of the participants (who is protestant and in fact the daughter of a protestant minister) if we as catholics believed in the perpetual virginity of Mary and I said yes. Then she went off on how in all of the denominations within christianity all expressed a different approach to God but that they were all good, holy, and basically took a relativistic approach to it.

I'm really not concerned about anyone claiming sola scriptura. It's the liberal and relativistic stuff that are the concerns.

[thessalonian]

[quote name='tinytherese' post='1676754' date='Oct 13 2008, 11:00 PM']What do you think?[/quote]

In general for the "average" Catholic I would not recommend them. If you are up on apologetics and solid in your church teaching as an evangelization venue, with much prayer I would say they could be attended, as long as they do not require you to agree with non-catholic theology. I see no real purpose in going to them as a means of trying to better understand the Bible as there are far better resources in the Catholic Church that are not so rife with errors and opinions. Pick up Knecht's Catholic Bible Commentary if you want to go deeper. Heck, read the Catechism. I don't recommend Little Rock however. It's wishy washy. I also think that a danger of being in a protestant study would be that one might tend to not speak out when things that are against Catholic theology are spoken in order to keep peace in the study. Our outlook on scripture is so different that you are bound to run in to these things.

[thessalonian]

By the way it is good to read the Churches decree on Ecumenism from Vatican II in considering these matters.

[url="http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html"]http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_council...egratio_en.html[/url]

[MakeYouThinkTwo]

[mod] you don't get to post here anymore. [/mod]

Edited October 25, 2008 by homeschoolmom

[Pax_Et_Bonum]

It all depends. Maybe you could go there and invite everyone to Mass and a Catholic bible study.

[Maggyie]

I attend a weekly Anglican Bible study with one of my best friends. The people at this church left the Episcopalian church over the ordination of active homosexuals, promotion of gay marriage etc. There are a number of former Catholics there (baptized in childhood but raised Episcopalian/Anglican) and I consider my presence a form of outreach, especially since they are at least open to the Church's teaching on homosexual acts.

The Bible study itself is quite nondenominational - the lady who runs it is very evangelical-oriented and talks about the dangers of "churchianity" etc. - and there have been no arguments (although I happened to be absent the day they went over the verse on Peter the rock, darn it!). Of course, IMHO Anglicanism is one of the least intellectually convincing branches of Christianity, so there is really no danger for me. I think I would convert to Judaism before I would convert to Anglicanism.