Semper Catholic Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Socrates' date='08 April 2010 - 02:30 PM' timestamp='1270755006' post='2089407'] The armed man in question was [i]black[/i], if you read back. Trying to play the "racism" card here is a bit out of place. [/quote] Either way the tactics of intimidation are not legal.
Winchester Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Semper Catholic' date='08 April 2010 - 04:16 PM' timestamp='1270757800' post='2089447'] Either way the tactics of intimidation are not legal. [/quote] We accept your surrender.
Nihil Obstat Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Winchester' date='08 April 2010 - 03:33 PM' timestamp='1270758821' post='2089455'] We accept your surrender. [/quote] Don't intimidate the poor guy- it's illegal.
Jesus_lol Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Socrates' date='08 April 2010 - 12:30 PM' timestamp='1270755006' post='2089407'] The armed man in question was [i]black[/i], if you read back. Trying to play the "racism" card here is a bit out of place. [/quote] you mean, ONE of the guys was black. one. there are other types of intimidation than racial, you know, and the fact that this guy was black doesnt mean he ios exempt from them. and thats only at the presidential speech, what about all the town hall meetings Tea Partiers showed up to armed?
Winchester Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Jesus_lol' date='08 April 2010 - 04:42 PM' timestamp='1270759365' post='2089463'] you mean, ONE of the guys was black. one. there are other types of intimidation than racial, you know, and the fact that this guy was black doesnt mean he ios exempt from them. and thats only at the presidential speech, what about all the town hall meetings Tea Partiers showed up to armed? [/quote] Why shouldn't people be armed? I see nothing wrong with carrying a weapon.
Saint Therese Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Winchester' date='08 April 2010 - 04:49 PM' timestamp='1270759786' post='2089469'] Why shouldn't people be armed? I see nothing wrong with carrying a weapon. [/quote] I owe +1!
Apotheoun Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Winchester' date='08 April 2010 - 02:49 PM' timestamp='1270759786' post='2089469'] Why shouldn't people be armed? I see nothing wrong with carrying a weapon. [/quote] I guess in Canada only the government can have guns. Thank God America has a constitution.
aalpha1989 Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Apotheoun' date='08 April 2010 - 04:56 PM' timestamp='1270760199' post='2089476'] I guess in Canada only the government can have guns. Thank God America has a constitution. [/quote] Canada has an unwritten one, and America's written constitution will only last so long.
ThePenciledOne Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='aalpha1989' date='08 April 2010 - 05:58 PM' timestamp='1270760314' post='2089478'] Canada has an unwritten one, and America's written constitution will only last so long. [/quote] Eh, America's constitution is already down the toilet.....or at least on the roll....
Winchester Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Thank God the US still has enough people who don't believe the right to life comes from the state.
aalpha1989 Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Winchester' date='08 April 2010 - 05:00 PM' timestamp='1270760409' post='2089480'] Thank God the US still has enough people who don't believe the right to life comes from the state. [/quote] Americans believe the right to anything comes from a piece of paper 200 years old.
Winchester Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='aalpha1989' date='08 April 2010 - 05:03 PM' timestamp='1270760620' post='2089481'] Americans believe the right to anything comes from a piece of paper 200 years old. [/quote] In part, yes, but if you press those who are opposing the current expansions of the State, you will find behind it a belief that rights are endowed by our Creator, not by the government. This is acknowledged by a piece of paper around that age.
Jesus_lol Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Apotheoun' date='08 April 2010 - 01:56 PM' timestamp='1270760199' post='2089476'] I guess in Canada only the government can have guns. Thank God America has a constitution. [/quote] we have 5 guns in our house. not counting pellet guns, and only one is a .22
Maximilianus Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 "This is my rifle, there are many like it but this one is mine" ARs are alright, but I prefer the 7.62 round the M1A sends down range. So far Obama's pen has proven to be mightier than some guy's rifle at a rally.
aalpha1989 Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Winchester' date='08 April 2010 - 05:06 PM' timestamp='1270760817' post='2089484'] In part, yes, but if you press those who are opposing the current expansions of the State, you will find behind it a belief that rights are endowed by our Creator, not by the government. This is acknowledged by a piece of paper around that age. [/quote] Lol. point taken.
Apotheoun Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='aalpha1989' date='08 April 2010 - 02:58 PM' timestamp='1270760314' post='2089478'] Canada has an unwritten one, and America's written constitution will only last so long. [/quote] Incorrect. Canada's "constitution" is an act of the British parliament. The attempts to establish a constitution in Canada, for Canada, and by Canadians, failed in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
Nihil Obstat Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Apotheoun' date='08 April 2010 - 03:56 PM' timestamp='1270760199' post='2089476'] I guess in Canada only the government can have guns. Thank God America has a constitution. [/quote] It is very very difficult to obtain your firearms permit in Canada. You may never legally carry it unless you're hunting with a hunting rifle, and you also need permits to transport it. Even once you have that permit, the permit itself specifies where you're allowed to take it, and nowhere else.
aalpha1989 Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 [quote name='Apotheoun' date='08 April 2010 - 05:11 PM' timestamp='1270761107' post='2089490'] Incorrect. Canada's "constitution" is an act of the British parliament. The attempts to establish a constitution in Canada, for Canada, and by Canadians, failed in the late 1980s and early 1990s. [/quote] Guess you're right. Constitutions "in, for, and by" only work if they are "in, for, and by" truly Christian people, though (hint: the Founding Fathers weren't Christian, and nowadays the US Constitution isn't run in,for, and by Christians anyway).
Resurrexi Posted April 8, 2010 Author Posted April 8, 2010 (edited) [quote name='aalpha1989' date='08 April 2010 - 04:32 PM' timestamp='1270762334' post='2089505'] the Founding Fathers weren't Christian [/quote] While some of the Founding Fathers were deists, others were devout Christians. Of particular note is Charles Carroll. King Louis XVI, a very devout Catholic monarch, also deserves to be counted as a Founding Father of the United States, at least to some degree. Edited April 8, 2010 by Resurrexi
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now