Wikileaks Helping Obama W/ “Transparency”

[Hassan]

[quote name='notardillacid' date='26 July 2010 - 03:30 PM' timestamp='1280172621' post='2148321']
I like to make asinine and unfounded generalizations too.
[/quote]
It is a [url="http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?showtopic=107030"]literary technique[/url]

[Jesus_lol]

[quote name='Winchester' date='26 July 2010 - 10:05 AM' timestamp='1280163907' post='2148266']
The problem is that wikileaks has already destroyed any notion of its being responsible with the asinine commentary added to the video of the Apache killing insurgents and the stupid journalists hanging out with armed enemy troops. So I have no confidence that the brats that run that operation carefully checked to make sure the information they're releasing wouldn't harm our side. If this wasn't cointelpro, I hope people get locked up for this. Betraying military secrets is a serious crime.
[/quote]

So if some asinine commentary on a video about the military and misrepresentation is enough to destroy all their credibility, are there any news outlets that you trust? cause im pretty sure every major one has done that countless times.

[Jesus_lol]

Dont forget Wikileaks is also helping GW Bush out with his transparency. after all it was kind of his military for 8 years.

[Winchester]

[quote name='Jesus_lol' date='26 July 2010 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1280175162' post='2148350']
So if some asinine commentary on a video about the military and misrepresentation is enough to destroy all their credibility, are there any news outlets that you trust? cause im pretty sure every major one has done that countless times.
[/quote]
No, I don't really trust any of them. Most commentary takes up the issues too late in the game. Nobody questions whether government has a right to execute some policy, merely how best to execute policies it's assumed the government already possesses the right to execute.

[Lounge Daddy]

[quote name='Jesus_lol' date='26 July 2010 - 03:17 PM' timestamp='1280175476' post='2148354']
Dont forget Wikileaks is also helping GW Bush out with his transparency. after all it was kind of his military for 8 years.
[/quote]

Oh that's true. And they started in 2007.

[Jesus_lol]

[quote name='Lounge Daddy' date='26 July 2010 - 08:44 PM' timestamp='1280202265' post='2148575']
Oh that's true. And they started in 2007.
[/quote]

the leaked documents? what time in 2007 do you know?

[Ed Normile]

[quote name='Jesus_lol' date='26 July 2010 - 10:55 PM' timestamp='1280202919' post='2148579']
the leaked documents? what time in 2007 do you know?
[/quote]


Wiki leaks was started in 2007.

This needs looked in to, these types of leaks can have serious reprecussions on troops. Someone mentioned Canada, its not only American troops that are affected by these leaks its all our allies in this war. This is a disgusting use of media to place in harms way the very young heroes that make it possible for clowns like this to be able to post things freely on the net. I wonder how free the internet use would be under a Sharia law state? These jerks need prosecuted, at least denounced by all countries involved.

ed

[Jesus_lol]

One of the things that concerns canada, is that apparently 4 of our troops were reported as being killed by insurgents, but the american reports list them as being killed by US army friendly fire.

[ThePenciledOne]

Gotta love the media.

[Slappo]

[quote name='Jesus_lol' date='26 July 2010 - 11:36 PM' timestamp='1280212563' post='2148635']
One of the things that concerns canada, is that apparently 4 of our troops were reported as being killed by insurgents, but the american reports list them as being killed by US army friendly fire.
[/quote]


Valid concern I'd say...

If it is researched and proven true... USA has a lot of explaining to do...