dominicansoul Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 what america needs is to ban celebrities from marrying [url="http://www.tmz.com/2011/10/31/kim-kardashian-divorce-kris-humphries-files/"]http://www.tmz.com/2011/10/31/kim-kardashian-divorce-kris-humphries-files/[/url]
homeschoolmom Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 [quote name='dominicansoul' timestamp='1320091973' post='2329453'] what america needs is to ban celebrities from marrying [url="http://www.tmz.com/2011/10/31/kim-kardashian-divorce-kris-humphries-files/"]http://www.tmz.com/2...umphries-files/[/url] [/quote] Good grief... has she even written her Thank-yous yet?
ardillacid Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 You think she can read and write? You are too generous
StMichael Posted November 3, 2011 Posted November 3, 2011 States can pass anything they like, if their individual constitution cites it, that is not out of line with the US Constitution. The US Constitution, does not allow for the giving of rights, in fact it is the States that grant it power. While DOMA is unconstitutional, yet left unchallenged, the key to that law is to prevent one state deciding for the other 49, whereby 2 men "marry" in NY (can't believe I am writing this) and move to NJ and then sue to be recognized. DOMA prevents NJ from having to recognize the union and overturning its laws against. This would be a ripple effect otherwise, whereby any gay organization could have a few couples go around the country and sue. The Constitution does not address marriage. Marriage is a sacred right. The governments role in marriage is that it benefits from the fruits. Those fruits are procreation, known paternity, child and spousal support, stability in family life and survivor rights. It keeps order and accountability. No one cares who is going steady with someone else (well except maybe TMZ, etc.), Gay anything does not add to the stability of life, is a sin against all faiths, of which all see this as a sacred right. No nation could survive without the family. Where children are born and raised. The nation would not grow. Just look at those communities where no one, but the government takes responsibility. Nothing but chaos.
dominicansoul Posted November 3, 2011 Posted November 3, 2011 [quote name='StMichael' timestamp='1320338884' post='2330815'] No nation could survive without the family. Where children are born and raised. The nation would not grow. Just look at those communities where no one, but the government takes responsibility. Nothing but chaos. [/quote] this is why satan has been attacking the family unit... birth control came to acceptance in the 60's, abortion in the 70's, rampant promiscuity was not addressed when I was growing up in the 1980's, where one out of every two girls in my highschool was pregnant... its still not addressed properly, the status quo seems to be "birth control education and safe sex" education, well, that just propagates the behavior, does nothing to promote responsibility, and we have millions of humans being raised, not in a family unit, but in single-parent homes, or placed for adoption, or raised by the government or worse, outright killed by abortion... the 90's saw a rise of the non-traditional family: that with same sex parents. now in the new millienium, everything goes... it is still not acceptable to promote programs that will teach our children abstinence only and learn how to respect themselves; to utter any type of condemnation of fornication we are scoffed at as "dreamers;" ... and forget about teaching that same sex unions are not morally acceptable... this is a real crisis, and it seems that we, the Church aren't doing much about it... too many souls being lost while we sit on our hands... the government is trying to "help" with their brand of morality that will be forced upon us all...
Papist Posted November 3, 2011 Posted November 3, 2011 [quote name='dominicansoul' timestamp='1320339924' post='2330819'] this is why satan has been attacking the family unit... birth control came to acceptance in the 60's, abortion in the 70's, rampant promiscuity was not addressed when I was growing up in the 1980's, where one out of every two girls in my highschool was pregnant... its still not addressed properly, the status quo seems to be "birth control education and safe sex" education, well, that just propagates the behavior, does nothing to promote responsibility, and we have millions of humans being raised, not in a family unit, but in single-parent homes, or placed for adoption, or raised by the government or worse, outright killed by abortion... the 90's saw a rise of the non-traditional family: that with same sex parents. now in the new millienium, everything goes... it is still not acceptable to promote programs that will teach our children abstinence only and learn how to respect themselves; to utter any type of condemnation of fornication we are scoffed at as "dreamers;" ... and forget about teaching that same sex unions are not morally acceptable... this is a real crisis, and it seems that we, the Church aren't doing much about it... too many souls being lost while we sit on our hands... the government is trying to "help" with their brand of morality that will be forced upon us all... [/quote] [url="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en.html"]http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en.html[/url]
CatherineM Posted November 3, 2011 Posted November 3, 2011 We were talking about HV yesterday in class. It was the only encyclical he wrote for about 10 years. It was as if he was placed on St. Peter's chair just so that he could write it. It's just about as inspired an encyclical as I have ever read.
Mark of the Cross Posted November 6, 2011 Posted November 6, 2011 (edited) [quote name='dominicansoul' timestamp='1320091973' post='2329453'] what america needs is to ban celebrities from marrying [url="http://www.tmz.com/2011/10/31/kim-kardashian-divorce-kris-humphries-files/"]http://www.tmz.com/2...umphries-files/[/url] [/quote] Banning them from abusing marriage would be a better option. In other words, once and once only. Edited November 6, 2011 by Mark of the Cross
Amppax Posted November 7, 2011 Posted November 7, 2011 (edited) I don't even know how to respond to this. Edited November 7, 2011 by Amppax
dominicansoul Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 [url="http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-york-archbishop-decrees-no-same-sex-marriages-in-catholic-churches-prop"]http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-york-archbishop-decrees-no-same-sex-marriages-in-catholic-churches-prop[/url]
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now