Mr.Cat Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 [quote name='Ed Normile' timestamp='1299040692' post='2217033']Well, if these atheists had just a few more brain cells than the microbes you speak of they would probably say, humans would walk the earth just as soom as the space shuttle crew returns from its orbit. Unless you decide to modify your question to include all life circling the earth on the international space station too.[/quote]Teaser. Though not for long, how would they live?
Laudate_Dominum Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 [quote name='thessalonian' timestamp='1298990802' post='2216759'] So can we expect to see higher beings in the future? Maybe that would dominate us? Will they come from out of humanity or from the animials? Is there a limit to the heights to which creatures can reach?[/quote] It seems like we've been keeping other species down, trashing ecosystems and biodiversity, so for this and other reasons I'd say the best bet for our fall from the top would a transhumanist / technological singularity scenario. Actually, another possibility might be some unprecedented disease pandemic, or the occasional doomsday asteroid, or maybe an extreme and sudden climate change event. Anyway, something that would take us down enough notches for some other life-form to have some chance of emerging as a challenge to our dominance. 'Tis a dismal line of speculation anyway. lol. Why do you ask mate?
Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 [quote name='Laudate_Dominum' timestamp='1299042842' post='2217048'] It seems like we've been keeping other species down, trashing ecosystems and biodiversity, so for this and other reasons I'd say the best bet for our fall from the top would a transhumanist / technological singularity scenario. Actually, another possibility might be some unprecedented disease pandemic, or the occasional doomsday asteroid, or maybe an extreme and sudden climate change event. Anyway, something that would take us down enough notches for some other life-form to have some chance of emerging as a challenge to our dominance. 'Tis a dismal line of speculation anyway. lol. Why do you ask mate? [/quote] After watching the computer navigate natural language and beat the two best Jeopardy players, I think that skynet is a much more likely scenario. I for one welcome our computer overlords.
Nihil Obstat Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam' timestamp='1299045745' post='2217069'] After watching the computer navigate natural language and beat the two best Jeopardy players, I think that skynet is a much more likely scenario. [b] I for one welcome our computer overlords.[/b] [/quote] Edited March 2, 2011 by Nihil Obstat
Laudate_Dominum Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam' timestamp='1299045745' post='2217069'] After watching the computer navigate natural language and beat the two best Jeopardy players, I think that skynet is a much more likely scenario. I for one welcome our computer overlords. [/quote] Indeed. A part of me would seriously prefer computer overlords to human overlords who wield unheard of technological powers over us rabble. Seriously, what's worse? Ray Kurzweil's fantasy life or Derrick Jensen's vision of the future? Watson seems to be a rather nice chap. . . [url="http://books.google.com/books?id=lbl4MN3iUHsC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false"]The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence[/url] [url="http://books.google.com/books?id=JcXO8GLMd2sC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false"]Welcome to the Machine: Science, Surveillance, and the Culture of Control[/url] edit: links added. Edited March 2, 2011 by Laudate_Dominum
ardillacid Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 [quote name='Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam' timestamp='1299045745' post='2217069'] After watching the computer navigate natural language and beat the two best Jeopardy players, I think that skynet is a much more likely scenario. I for one welcome our computer overlords. [/quote] The only reason Watson won was because of his superiour ability to buzz in
Winchester Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 [quote name='ardillacid' timestamp='1299079390' post='2217130'] The only reason Watson won was because of his superiour ability to buzz in [/quote] If you shoot first and shoot well, you win. A win is a win.
Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 [quote name='ardillacid' timestamp='1299079390' post='2217130'] The only reason Watson won was because of his superiour ability to buzz in [/quote] That was not the impressive thing. What made it so impressive was that the computer could (I won't say comprehend because that isn't right) but deal with natural language and give the correct response. In jeopardy it would have to deal with puns, jokes, and other things and it did. That is what was impressive, it could deal with natural language...just one step closer to HAL reading our lips.
ardillacid Posted March 3, 2011 Posted March 3, 2011 [quote name='Winchester' timestamp='1299089968' post='2217183'] If you shoot first and shoot well, you win. A win is a win. [/quote] Your violent rhetoric is dangerous and getting people killed
AudreyGrace Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 In my experience, it seems that atheists almost don't care about such things as the continuation of human life after a situation you presented, but more so that what will happen.. happens, and what can we do to make this life our greatest.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now