Right Now Who Wins? Obama Or Romney?

[CatherineM]

I don't love Canada especially, but I do love a special Canadian.

[4588686]

Nick? Why does he get all the phatmass chicks?

[Winchester]

I think the left/right thing is a terrible paradigm, anyway.

[4588686]

[quote name='Winchester' timestamp='1350713928' post='2495265']
I think the left/right thing is a terrible paradigm, anyway.
[/quote]


I'd agree with that.

[Winchester]

[quote name='Hasan' timestamp='1350714037' post='2495266']


I'd agree with that.
[/quote]
But it is very useful for flaming.

If people are paying attention.

[KnightofChrist]

Obama is not a leftist, he is a Socialist and a Communist. Ooooooh snap!

Hasan meltdown in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1...

[4588686]

[quote name='Winchester' timestamp='1350714884' post='2495267']
But it is very useful for flaming.

If people are paying attention.
[/quote]


lol wut?

[4588686]

[quote name='KnightofChrist' timestamp='1350714905' post='2495268']
Obama is not a leftist, he is a Socialist and a Communist. Ooooooh snap!

Hasan meltdown in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1...
[/quote]


I wish I had props for this.

[Vincent Vega]

[quote name='Winchester' timestamp='1350681456' post='2495030']
But at least the word makes sense.
[/quote]
Tsk tsk. Words don't mean anything except for the meanings we give them. Grammar is just a corrupted form of the word grammar; yet, you still use acceptable grammar and are not NEARLY are glamorous as I.
[quote name='Socrates' timestamp='1350697233' post='2495181']
Yes, I know all leftists (including Communists) claim their brutality is only a temporary necessity, and once they have their way, the state will wither away and all that jazz, but the reality is when in control, leftism always results in tyranny.

. . . beaver dam, wish I had props to give Winnie in this thread . . .
[/quote]
I'd agree with this.
[quote name='Socrates' timestamp='1350698620' post='2495192']
Romney is nowhere close to the "far Right."
He was probably overall the most liberal of the major GOP candidates.
[/quote]
And this.
[quote name='Hasan' timestamp='1350708079' post='2495247']
Nick? Why does he get all the phatmass chicks?
[/quote]
Forreal.

[Anastasia13]

I want to vote for Obama/Ryan 2012. Le sigh...

[Aloysius]

All that needs to happen for that is a tie in the electoral college, the Democrats re-take the house, but the Republicans re-take the senate. While all three of those things are very unlikely (especially given my prediction that either Jill Stein or Ralph Nader on a write in will be winning in a landslide), it is possible haha. More likely if there's a tie is that the House and Senate majorities will stay the same and we could end up with Romney/Obama.

Personally, I want neither of them to get 270. I know it's unlikely, but it would be really amesome if that happened because of the faithless electors in Texas and Nevada who will be voting for Ron Paul in the electoral college (yes, there's at least one electoral vote Romney simply cannot win, consequences of being a cheating manipulating idiot in the primaries and state conventions ). At the very least we could save ourselves all the bull croutons about one of them having a "mandate" from the people, since they'd have been elected by congress.

[qfnol31]

I did the math on CNN's map last night and with current polling I think it's quite possible we'd see a tie if things remain about where they are.

[Groo the Wanderer]

kick em all out of office. impose term limits. let no lawyers hold public office. mandate the first 4 yrs no laws may be passed other than a review of every single govt agency, department, bureau - dismantle every single one not allowed by the US Constitution (and that commerce clause cwap is out). then start over

[MIKolbe]

and in 200 years we'd be in the same place we are now.

[Winchester]

[quote name='MIkolbe' timestamp='1350762606' post='2495409']
and in 200 years we'd be in the same place we are now.
[/quote]
I think it would happen more quickly, this time. They've learned.

[r2Dtoo]

We should all invest in Red Bull's space program (clearly better than NASA) and move to Mars.

[Nihil Obstat]

[quote name='r2Dtoo' timestamp='1350764073' post='2495423']
We should all invest in Red Bull's space program (clearly better than NASA) and move to Mars.
[/quote]
I would rather get behind Rockstar. I prefer their energy drinks. It is my go-to emergency supply for all night study sessions.

[r2Dtoo]

[quote name='Nihil Obstat' timestamp='1350764761' post='2495430']
I would rather get behind Rockstar. I prefer their energy drinks. It is my go-to emergency supply for all night study sessions.
[/quote]
But does Rockstar have a space program? Do they give you wings?

[Nihil Obstat]

[quote name='r2Dtoo' timestamp='1350764998' post='2495433']
But does Rockstar have a space program? Do they give you wings?
[/quote]
Not yet, but competition is the soul of the market. If we get three or four solid competitors, we will be mining asteroids by the time my children are old enough to make fun of me for being old.

[r2Dtoo]

[quote name='Nihil Obstat' timestamp='1350765121' post='2495435']
Not yet, but competition is the soul of the market. If we get three or four solid competitors, we will be mining asteroids by the time my children are old enough to make fun of me for being old.
[/quote]
I thought we were already at that point.